Active clinical trials for "Dental Caries"

The Children's Amalgam Trial is one of only two randomized trials of its kind, and the only such trial in the United States, to address the potential impact of mercury exposure from amalgam restorations on neuropsychological and renal function in children.

The purpose of this study is to control the levels of bacteria that causes cavities in mothers by a combination of treatments that include fluoride and chlorhexidine varnishes and xylitol-chewing gum before the appearance of teeth in the mouth of their children. By doing that we expect to reduce the acquisition of the bacteria that causes cavities (the mutans streptococci) by the children which in turn will reduce the development of cavities.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are detectable health effects of low-level mercury exposure (from normal exposure to mercury-containing dental fillings) in the known target organs/systems affected by elemental mercury exposure.

It has been demonstrated that a great amount of tooth structure is lost during the prosthetic preparations of abutments for full-coverage FDPs with tooth substance removal of 63% of 73%, this aggressive loss of tooth structure usually accompanied with pain and post-operative sensitivity. In comparison with the vertical preparation technique, there is less amount of tooth substance loss. this clinical study will provide benefits for practitioners and clinicians by guiding them to choose a more conservative treatment plan with the better marginal fit, clinical performance and satisfaction for the patients on the long term. rather than other benefits like less chair time, less risk for pulp injury, less time and cost

Medical Treatment of Early-Enamel Carious Lesion using Different Remeneralizing agents

Cohort study to evaluate the effect of oral health educational program effect on oral health of school children, their mothers and teachers

This study mainly compared the response of the artificial carious enamel lesions to remineralisation in situ. The tested in vitro demineralising protocols were: MC gel, PA gel, MHDP and Buffer solutions. The lesions were then remineralised in an in situ model, with crossover and double blind design. Fifteen volunteers wore intra-oral appliances containing 2 bovine enamel samples of each demineralising protocol during 3 experimental phases (3 days each). The experimental phases/treatments were: Control (Placebo dentifrice, saliva effect only), Home-care (fluoride dentifrice, 1,100 ppm F, NaF), and Professional/Home-care (varnish- 22,600 ppm F and dentifrice- 1,100 ppm F, NaF). During the 3-day phase, the appliance was only removed during the main meals (four times a day, maximum 1 h duration each, interval between meals 2-3 h). Immediately after the meals, before replacing the appliance in the mouth, the subjects were advised to perform oral hygiene using a soft end-rounded toothbrush (Colgate® 360º Sensitive Pro-Relief TM) and dentifrice (non-fluoridated from IceFresh, Bauru, SP, Brazil or fluoridated dentifrice from Crest Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the phase and dental floss (Sanifill, São Paulo, Brazil). The remineralising treatment with dentifrices was done ex vivo, 1 min twice a day (after the first and last oral hygiene of the day) using slurry of the dentifrice (1:3 water, 1 drop of solution/specimen). Thereafter, the appliance was replaced in the mouth and the subjects were advised to rinse with 10 ml of water for 5 s and to expectorate. In respect to Professional/Home-care phase, the varnish (Duraphat, Colgate, SP, Brazil) was applied before the in situ study for 6h and then removed. The enamel remineralization was quantified using transverse microradiography (% mineral recovery and lesion depth, TMR), surface and cross-sectional hardness. The data were submitted to statistical analysis (p<0.05).

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness of three treatments involving different caries management strategies (conventional restorations, Hall technique, and Non-Restorative Caries Treatment) to the management of class II carious primary molars in children (3-8 year-old).

Background: Tooth decay in children (Early childhood caries, or ECC) is a common childhood disease. Poor dentition significantly affects the nutrition, growth, development and general health of children. Conventional dental care for ECC is neither affordable nor accessible, particularly for the disadvantaged communities. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a safe, cost-effective caries-arresting agent that appears to conform to the World Health Organization's Millennium Goals. SDF is commercially available at 38% and 12%, and topically used yearly or half-yearly to arrest ECC. The SDF regimens used for ECC treatment lack an evidence base. Therefore it is necessary to find the most suitable SDF concentration and application interval to arrest ECC. The purpose of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of two commercially available SDF solutions at pre-prepared concentrations of 38% and 12% when applied at yearly or half-yearly intervals over 36 months in arresting caries in primary teeth. Methods / Design: This double-blinded study has recruited 888 kindergarten children aged 3-4 years with caries. The sample size is sufficient for the appropriate statistical analyses. The children were classified into high and low caries rates and equally allocated into four groups for the caries treatment: Group A - semi-annual application of 12% SDF; Group B - annual application of 12% SDF; Group C - semi-annual application of 38% SDF; Group D - annual application of 38% SDF. The children will be followed for 36 months in their kindergartens until they enter primary school. Clinical examinations at 6-month intervals will be conducted to assess whether the caries are arrested. Information on confounding factors, such as oral hygiene habits and the use of other fluoride agents, will be collected through a parental questionnaire at the baseline and follow-ups. Discussion: This study will help determine the most suitable SDF concentration and application interval to arrest caries in children. Because SDF use for caries arrest is painless, simple, and low-cost, it can be widely recommended and promoted for caries control in young children or those with difficulty accessing and affording conventional dental care. The applicability of the findings and their impact on public health would be immense.

This study will be a cross-over single blinded clinical study to evaluate the in vitro fluoride release of three different brands of 5% NaF varnish. The goal of this study is to determine if different formulations of varnish lead to differing amounts of fluoride release. Despite their similar concentrations of NaF (5%), some in vitro data have suggested that they may differ in the amount of fluoride release. Determining fluoride release of these varnishes in vivo is important in assessing both the safety and efficacy of the product.