Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"

Discomfort during respiratory decompensation of a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or obesity with a BMI greater than 30, in intensive care and the establishment of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is frequent and a source of failure. this therapy. Pharmacological treatments may be impossible due to the pathology, the risk of it worsening and adverse effects. In this context, hypnosis appears to be a tool that would promote comfort and thus increase tolerance of NIV.

The objective of this protocol is to test the effectiveness of a Jumpstart intervention on patient-centered outcomes for patients with chronic illness by ensuring that they receive care that is concordant with their goals over time, and across settings and providers. This study is particularly interested in understanding the effect of the intervention to improve quality of palliative care for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) but will also include other common chronic, life-limiting illnesses. The specific aims are: To evaluate the efficacy of the Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart compared to the EHR based clinician Jumpstart and usual care for improving quality of care; the primary outcome is EHR documentation of a goals-of-care discussion from randomization through hospitalization or 30 days. Secondary outcomes include: a) intensity of care outcomes (e.g., ICU use, ICU and hospital length of stay, costs of care during the hospitalization, 7 and 30 day readmission); and b) patient- and family-reported outcomes assessed by surveys at 3 days and 4 weeks after randomization, including occurrence and quality of goals-of-care discussions in the hospital, goal-concordant care, psychological symptoms, and quality of life. To conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the intervention, guided by the RE-AIM framework for implementation science, incorporating quantitative evaluation of the intervention's reach and adoption, as well as qualitative analyses of interviews with participants, to explore barriers and facilitators to future implementation and dissemination.

Patients with COPD frequently have muscle disorders. Pathogenic mechanisms generate significant pathophysiological changes in the locomotor muscles structure, leading to decreased strength, decreased endurance and limited exercise capacity. Pulmonary rehabilitation is the first choice therapy and training overall lower limb endurance is a priority. Even if the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation are no longer to be demonstrated, it is still necessary to optimize the modalities of muscular strengthening. In fact, it is recommended to associate to this global endurance training a specific strengthening of the muscles of the lower limbs. Neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) is a muscular strengthening technique, but this method is not used in usual practice in pulmonary rehabilitation and often only the quadriceps are concerned. In a pulmonary rehabilitation program, including sessions of NMES of the quadriceps femoris and triceps surae could increase its effectiveness. Recent studies suggest that NMES can improve muscle function, exercise tolerance, dyspnea and quality of life in COPD patients. A pilot study compared the effects of the combined quadriceps femoris and triceps surae versus quadriceps alone. The final evaluation showed a greater improvement in exercise capacity in favour of the combined NMES group. Only two studies with small numbers of patients evaluated the effect of combined quadriceps femoris and triceps surae NMES in pulmonary rehabilitation, with encouraging results in terms of functional gain. Further larger studies seem necessary to evaluate the effects of combined quadriceps femoris and triceps surae NMES in pulmonary rehabilitation. The objective of the study is to show that combined quadriceps femoris and triceps surae NMES during a pulmonary rehabilitation program provides a more significant improvement in exercise capacity compared to a standard pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Individuals who have COPD need a nursing service, which provides qualified and effective professional care, self-care, and supportive care to perform their daily life activities, and improve their quality of life. It is predicted that the Chronic Care-Based Training Program to be implemented and the follow-ups can increase the level of self-efficacy and satisfaction, and raise awareness on the management of the disease in patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of the Chronic Care Model based education and telephone follow-up given to patients with COPD on self-efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Also, the Modified Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-mCOPD-PRO scale, which will be used in the study, will be adapted into Turkish language and culture, and will be used in the study after its validity and reliability are examined.

Chronic respiratory diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) constitute a major public health problem, due to their high prevalence, but especially because of their cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity and mortality and the associated costs for the health system. The organization of long-term management of these diseases is now part of the e-health process, digital health with the use of massive "big data" generated by care and follow-up. Therapeutic patient education and the integration of connected objects will allow personalized therapeutic education support with interventions by local medical staff adapted to the needs of the patients. This will also allow to objectify the effect of treatments such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for OSA or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and/or oxygen therapy for COPD, not only on the prevention of respiratory decompensation but also on cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors which are major elements of the prognosis. This project will therefore make it possible to demonstrate the feasibility and to deploy a multi-actor care pathway in the territory. The investigators propose a prospective clinical study, conducted at the Verdun Hospital, with the main objective of studying the evolution of the quality of life of patients with a chronic respiratory pathology, during an integrated management at home for 6 months. The secondary objectives: To study the evolution of the following parameters, before treatment (at inclusion) and after 6 months of integrated management: Treatment compliance (CPAP or NIV/oxygen therapy) Physical activity Weight Mean arterial pressure Oxygen saturation, heart rate and respiratory rate for COPD patients Severity of COPD for the patients concerned Daytime sleepiness Fatigue Patient acceptability of the use of connected objects To analyze the trajectories of the measures collected throughout the integrated management to identify specific profiles. To analyze the daily data of the different connected objects and treatments with regard to the patients' profiles (according to age, gender, comorbidities, OSA or COPD group).

A 3-year cluster randomized controlled trial of the impact of a quality improvement and clinical decision support package versus usual care for patients with modifiable high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with or without a current diagnosis.

Background: Over 26 million Americans have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Unfortunately, few patients receive proven therapies and many receive therapies known to have safer alternatives. One major reason is the competing demands of primary care providers (PCPs) who manage 90% of patients with COPD. The research team has developed a population management approach where pulmonary specialists provide evidence-based recommendations as an E-consult with unsigned orders to PCPs. PCPs can then quickly review the E-consult and sign, modify, or discontinue these orders. The investigators found this intervention led to marked improvements in the quality-of-care delivered and patients' COPD-related quality-of-life. While promising, this approach is limited by a paucity of pulmonary providers nationwide. Clinical pharmacists are 20 times more prevalent as pulmonary specialists and some regions of VA (VISN 17, COPD Cares) have assigned clinical pharmacists a role in the management of patients with COPD. However, the relative effectiveness of pharmacist-led management is yet to be established. Study Description: This study tests population management for COPD provided by pharmacists relative to pulmonary specialists. The investigators are conducting a cluster randomized clinical trial at five medical centers and their associated clinics within the Department of Veterans Affair. Study staff will randomize PCPs to population management conducted by either pulmonary specialists or pharmacists. Within PCPs' panels, study staff will use VA electronic health record to identify patients with evidence of COPD. Pulmonologists and pharmacists will review these patients and provide guideline-based recommendations to PCPs. Pulmonary specialists and pharmacists will then deliver evidence-based recommendations through E-consults coupled with unsigned orders for primary care providers to sign, modify or decline. Outcomes: Investigators will assess if proactive, population management recommendations by clinical pharmacists and pulmonary specialists lead to non-inferior outcomes for patients with COPD. The primary outcome will be a composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, hospitalization, or death six month after intervention. Secondary outcomes will include 1) the proportion of guideline recommended therapies received by patients, 2) COPD-related quality-of-life as measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, and 3) PCP acceptance of recommendations, and 4) each individual outcome within the primary composite endpoint above.

To investigate the relationship among the neural respiratory drive (NRD), the sensation of the dyspnea and the effect of the bronchodilator on each stage COPD patients.

The combined measurement of the pulmonary diffusing capacity to carbon monoxide (CO) and nitric oxide (NO) (DLCO/NO) during exercise may be a useful physiological measure of alveolar-capillary reserve in patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study investigated the test-retest reliability of DLCO/NO-based metrics.

Patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) suffer from a progressive loss of lung function that leads to poor quality of life, and often invalidity and early death. Regular exercise can improve quality of life in these patients, but the health care system lack the underlying mechanism of exercise-induced improvement in COPD and it is widely thought not to have any effect on lung function. The aim of the present study is to investigate to which extent lung tissue mass and rest-to-exercise diffusion capacity changes differ in COPD patients compared to the healthy state. In order to design prospective clinical trials on the putative impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) investigating these parameters, and a secondary aim is to assess the feasibility of such a study in terms of patient inclusion, adherence and methodology.