Active clinical trials for "Colonic Polyps"

Hypothesis:The Adnab-9 antigen is a predictive biomarker in individuals at risk of developing colorectal neoplasia. Study aim is to evaluate the potential of the Adnab-9 monoclonal antibody (MAb) as a marker of cancer risk in a population at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). This marker would be compared to other current and emerging diagnostic methods. 2,800 Veterans would be recruited into the study. In phase 1, candidates would be defined as having increased CRC risk by a short questionnaire. Stool samples would be obtained and a semi-quantitative Adnab-9 antigen assay (ELISA) would be determined. Patients with differing high and low estimations of fecal Adnab-9 would undergo colonoscopy at which time other samples of effluent and colonic mucosa would be taken, and a detailed lifestyle and nutritional questionnaire would be completed. The characteristics of the Adnab-9 fecal test as a diagnostic test would be critically determined using the outcome of the colonoscopic and other test results. The patients will be contacted through the mail and by word of mouth. Informed consent will be obtained before the samples are obtained. The participants are clinically defined as high-risk and therefore screening colonoscopy would be likely performed in any event. A number of assays for Adnab-9 are feasible including slot-blot, Western blot, and ELISA. Other stool studies include conventional fecal occult blood tests (FOBT or FIT) that will be performed in tandem. The investigators therefore began this method of collection and obtained consent from over 2000 patients with a similar overall compliance rate with FOBT screening procedures to that reported previously of approximately 50%. Currently the study is no longer enrolling patients at the Detroit VA and is now finalizing data entry. Another 450 patients to be recruited at the Philadelphia VAMC.

To analyse the efficacy and safety of two standard methods of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, the investigators will compare submucosal injection-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (SEMR) versus underwater endoscopic mucosal resection, without submucosal injection (UEMR).

Colonoscopy( examining the colon with a flexible tube and a camera ) is usually done for screening purposes to find any precancerous lesions (polyps) at an early stage. During the colonoscopy the doctor will advance the colonoscope to the end of your colon and start examining the colon for any polyps. "Withdrawal time" is the period of time the doctor spends examining the colon. Doctors usually spend six minutes examining the colon after they reach the end of the colon. Studies have showed that spending more withdrawal time detects more lesions. The proposal to dedicating half of the withdrawal time during colonoscopy in examining the right side will increase the detection of polyps in the right side of the colon. There will be no other changes in the procedural aspect of the colonoscopy.

There have been very limited evidence about the bleeding complication during colon polypectomy for the patients taking warfarin. This study is aimed to analyse the effect of prophylactic hemo-clipping during colon polypectomy for the patients with warfarin consumption. The enrolled subjects are the patients who take warfarin for high thromboembolism risk and should take heparin bridging therapy during colon polypectomy instead of temporary stopping warfarin. The investigators will randomize into two groups; the patient enrolled into group 1 will be performed hemoclipping for all polypectomy lesion irrespective of the presence of immediate bleeding. And the patients enrolled into group 2 will be performed hemoclipping only for the lesion of immediate bleeding during colon polypectomy. The primary endpoint is to compare the rate of delayed bleeding between two groups.

The investigators will investigate the efficacy of EMR compared to CSP in treatment of small colon polp (6~10mm). One aim of this study was to investigate the necessity of EMR on resection of small colon polyp.

Colonoscopy is the standard of care for the detection of colorectal polyps and adenoma, and colorectal cancer detection. Despite a meticulous evaluation of the colonic mucosa during colonoscopy, a substantial number of colorectal polyps might be missed and colorectal cancer might not be prevented. Previous studies described a 12-28% of miss-rate for all polyps, a 31% for hyperplastic polyps and 6-27% for adenomas, with a higher miss rate noted for smaller polyps. The lesion missing rate depends on several factors, such as the location on difficult areas to be evaluated with conventional colonoscopes (the proximal side of the ileocecal valve, haustral folds, flexures or rectal valves), a flat shape, an inadequate bowel preparation and inadequate endoscopy technique, a time-limited colonoscope withdrawal. If the standard 140º angle of view colonoscope is used approximately 13% of the colonic surface is unevaluated. The incorporation of colonoscopes with a 170-degree wide angled could improve adenoma detection rate. The introduction of high definition (HD) colonoscopes and visual image enhancement technologies, such as narrow band imaging (NBI, Olympus America, Center Valley, PA), I-SCAN™ (Pentax Medical, Montvale, NJ) and Fuji Intelligent Chromo-Endoscopy (FICE™, Fujinon Endoscopy, Wayne, NJ) have improved the lesion characterization; however, several studies have failed to prove an increase in the adenoma detection rates. The Third Eye Retroscope (Avantis Medical Systems, Sunnyvale, CA) is a disposable retrograde viewing device advanced through the accessory channel of a standard colonoscope. It allows retrograde viewing behind colonic folds and flexures simultaneously with the forward view of the colon. Although it shows an increase in the adenoma detection rate by 11%-25%, it has many disadvantages. First, it requires a separate processor and the device is disposable, increasing the cost of the procedure. Second, it occupies the working channel of the colonoscope, limiting the ability to suction. Third, if a polyp is detected, the viewing device has to be removed in order to perform the polypectomy. Fourth, the optic is not high definition and finally, the endoscopist has to get used to visualizing and processing two simultaneous video streams from the colonoscopy and from the retroscope device.

61 subjects (male or female) between the ages of 45 and 75 will undergo colonoscopy. The primary outcome is Cecal Intubation

The colonoscopy procedure involves insertion of a thin, flexible tube with a tiny camera inside (colonoscope) passed inside the bowel. To allow passage of the colonoscope and adequate visualisation of the lining of the bowel wall a range of techniques can be used. During colonoscopy, you can distend the colon with water, CO2 and air. Air is no longer recommended for gas insufflation during colonoscopy as it causes pain and excess bowel distention. So the options are water and/or CO2 but it is not entirely clear which combination is the best and at what point during the colonoscopy. In practice, a hybrid technique where both CO2 and water are used during the colonoscopy in used. Here, water is exclusively used to help navigate the sigmoid colon with air pockets suctioned and turbid water exchanged with clean water. From splenic flexure to caecum a mixture of water and CO2 is used. The aim of this study is to assess procedure comfort and efficiency of two different colonoscopy insertion techniques: water-alone insertion of the colonoscope (gas insufflation not allowed on insertion; water exchange technique) versus water-CO2 hybrid insertion (water used predominately to splenic flexure with water/CO2 used to caecum; modified water immersion technique).

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for polyp detection (CADe)

This controlled-randomized trial compares the artificial intelligence Genius® system assisted (Genius+) to standard (Genius-) colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of Genius® system on ADR in routine colonoscopy. The secondary aims will be the impact of Genius® system on polyp detection rate (PDR), serrated polyp detection rate (SPDR), advanced neoplasia detection rate (ANDR), mean number of polyps (MNP), polyp type and localization, and operator type (according to basal ADR).