Active clinical trials for "Colonic Polyps"

Summary Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Spain (11,000 deaths per year). Screening of the population over 50 years of age with no significant history (intermediate risk) is recommended, but which screening method is best for promoting adherence in this type of patient has not been well established. There are currently two screening methods that are less invasive than conventional colonoscopy and seem to have higher sensitivity than the test for faecal occult blood (FOBT). These two methods are the colon capsule, which consists in ingesting a capsule that takes photographs of the colon, and virtual colonoscopy, which is a radiological technique. Objectives: 1. To demonstrate that virtual colonoscopy and colon capsule are effective CRC screening techniques in the intermediate risk population, with diagnostic rates comparable to conventional colonoscopy (concordance). 2. To compare the diagnostic rates of the colon capsule and virtual colonoscopy with respect to the size and characteristics of the lesions visualised. 3. To compare the participation rates for each screening strategy and identify the factors that influence participation (individual, family, and socioeconomic factors as well as those relating to the doctor).

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with rates of CRC predicted to increase. Colonoscopy is currently the gold standard of screening for CRC. Artificial intelligence (AI) is seen as a solution to bridge this gap in adenoma detection, which is a quality indicator in colonoscopy. AI systems utilize deep neural networks to enable computer-aided detection (CADe) and computer-aided classification (CADx). CADe is concerned with the detection of polyps during colonoscopy, which in turn is postulated to help decrease the adenoma miss-rate. In contrast, CADx deals with the interpretation of polyp appearance during colonoscopy to determine the predicted histology. Prediction of polyp histology is crucial in helping Clinicians decide on a "resect and discard" or "diagnose and leave strategy". It is also useful for the Clinician to be aware of the predicted histology of a colorectal polyp in determining the appropriate method of resection in terms of safety and efficacy. While CADe has been studied extensively in randomized controlled trials, there is a lack of prospective data validating the use of CADx in a clinical setting to predict polyp histology. The investigators plan to conduct a prospective, multi-centre clinical trial to validate the accuracy of CADx support for prediction of polyp histology in real-time colonoscopy.

The hypothesis of this study is that prophylactic coagulation therapy with coagulation forceps to visible vessels within the mucosal defect for colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) will reduce the rate of delayed bleeding when compared with current established standard EMR technique.

Comparison of the number of adenomas missed by the first exploration of the right colon by LCI (linked color imaging) or by white light during a colonoscopy, according to the order of randomization.

The focus of the study is to evaluate impact on Adenomas Per Colonoscopy (APC) with a Computer Aided Detection (CAD) software assisting the gastroenterologist during a colonoscopy procedure.

Current guidelines recommend resection and histopathological analyses of all colorectal polyps. Real-time optical diagnosis can obviate non-neoplastic polyp resection ("diagnose-and-leave-behind") and histopathological analyses of diminutive polyps ("predict-resect-and-discard") reducing healthcare and cost burden. The investigators aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CAD EYE® (Fujifilm,Germany) in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps compared to endoscopic diagnosis with histopathology as the gold-standard. For this purpose, a single-centre prospective study of diminutive/small colorectal polyps is ongoing.

PURPOSE OF PROTOCOL Objective: To evaluate if the speedometer based on the real-time image analysis can help endoscopists increase their withdrawal time, which is defined as time spent examining the colon during withdrawal of the colonoscope, during colonoscopy. Hypothesis: The trial hypothesis is that use of the speedometer during colonoscopy will increase the average withdrawal time, which is defined as time spent examining the colon during withdrawal of the colonoscope, by 1.6 minutes, possibly increasing the performance of the participating endoscopists. Our objective is to clarify the clinical benefits of this digital tool in colonoscopy. Endpoint: Withdrawal time difference between colonoscopies done without the speedometer (control period) and colonoscopies done with the speedometer (intervention period).

This is a post-marketing, single-arm, prospective study investigating the use of GI Genius CADx device in the real-time characterization of colorectal polyps (i.e. prediction of their histology during the colonoscopy). Patients enrolled will undergo a standard white-light colonoscopy with the support of the latest version of the CE-marked GI Genius CADx device. Colonoscopy will be performed according to the standard practice.

Early cancers of the rectum can be removed safely through the anus without subjecting patients to major abdominal surgery in a procedure called TEMS (transanal endoscopic microsurgery). Patients undergoing TEMS can benefit from reduced mortality, impotence, hospital stay and avoiding a stoma that may be associated with pelvic surgery. Currently few of the patients eligible for TEMS are offered it for a variety of reasons that include uncertainties about the risk of leaving residual tumour and the increased risk of subsequent recurrence of cancer within the pelvis. Current UK guidelines state there is no role for imaging in assessing the malignant polyp. Conversely whilst retrospectively reviewing their MRI databank the investigators have found evidence that MRI can accurately judge the depth of these early tumours and thereby potentially identify patients for local excision. The investigators hope to prospectively test their hypothesis that an MRI scan can accurately gauge depth of tumour spread in an unselected group of benign and malignant tumours measuring between 20mm and 50mm in size. The investigators will identify eligible patients awaiting surgery / polypectomy and if they consent to this pilot study participants will undergo an MRI to assess their tumour which assesses safety at all levels of the rectal wall. The accuracy of MRI can then be established by reference to gold standard histopathology. Should MRI prove sensitive and specific then the investigators hope to change national guidelines to mandate MRI to standardise assessment and thereby increase the appropriate use of TEMS in the UK.

Colonoscopy is the gold standard screening test for colorectal cancer. Removal of pre-malignant colon polyps during colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality by over 50%. However, while colonoscopy is highly effective at preventing distal (left sided) colon cancers, it provides only limited protection from cancer in the proximal (right side) colon. Our goal is to determine if additional pre-cancerous colon polyps can be identified by looking at the right side of the colon in retroflexion. During retroflexion the tip of the colonoscope is turned 180 degrees; allowing the doctor to view the backs of colonic folds. If additional polyps can be identified in this manner colonoscopy will become a more efficient method of screening for colon cancer. In order to evaluate how effective right colon retroflexion is at detecting polyps in the proximal colon we plan on performing a randomized, controlled trial. Patients undergoing screening or follow up colonoscopy will be invited to participate in the study. Those patients who agree to participate will be randomized into one of two groups once the colonoscope is fully inserted. Group one will have the right side of their colon examined for polyps with the endoscope looking forward (traditional form of examination) followed by repeat examination of the right side of the colon with the colonosocpe in retroflexion (looking backwards). Polyps seen during each section of the exam will be removed and manner in which the polyps were found/ removed will be recorded. Following the two exams of the right side of the colon the colonoscopy will be completed in the usual manner. The duration of each portion of colonoscopy will be recorded. After the procedure is completed the physician performing the colonoscopy will rate difficulty of the procedure and confidence with quality of the examination. Pathology results for each polyp will be recorded once available. There will be no study related follow up after the pathology results are recorded.