Active clinical trials for "Heart Failure"

An exaggerated ventilatory response (minute ventilation, V̇E) to exercise relative to exhaled carbon dioxide (V̇CO2) is common in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced as well as preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFpEF). Severity of this exaggerated response is associated with poor prognosis. This response may be triggered by pulmonary congestion and peripheral muscle myopathy. A vicious circle is fuelled by hypersensitivity of chemoreceptors to hypercapnia and sympathetic nervous hyperactivity, resulting in hyperventilation (low PaCO2). Low PaCO2 is predictive of mortality in these patients. PaCO2 can be increased acutely, e.g. by apnoea. Also, nasal breathing has been found to reduce the V̇E/V̇CO2 slope during exercise compared to oral breathing. Three previous slow breathing studies in HFrEF patients have had encouraging results with regard to reducing sympathetic activity, reflected in lowered arterial (pulmonary) blood pressure and increased EF. The investigators hypothesise that a 12-week training with nasal slow breathing followed by end-expiratory apnoea based on education, centre-based introduction and home-based 15 min/day breathing training will be effective at reducing the exaggerated ventilatory response to exercise. A total of 68 patients with stable HF seen at the HF clinics of the Inselspital (34 HFrEF, 34 HFpEF) will be randomised to the breathing intervention or usual care. Primary outcome will be V̇E/V̇CO2 slope at 12 weeks. If breathing training successfully ameliorates the exaggerated ventilatory response and perception of dyspnea during exercise, it offers an attractive tele-health based add-on therapy that may add to or even amplify the beneficial effects of exercise training.

The purpose of the program. Formulation of new treatments for heart and pulmonary failure through using organ-replacing technologies. Formulation of a clinical protocol and implementation of treatment methods into clinical practice heart and pulmonary failure using organ-replacing technologies. New methods were created for rehabilitating the function of affected organs after implantation of the LVAD, a total artificial heart, an extracorporeal life-sustaining system will be of great importance, both for Kazakhstan and for states with similar problems of donor organ deficiency, will also improve the effectiveness of surgical treatment and reduce the level of complications and mortality of patients on the extracorporeal life-sustaining system and septic patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the treatment of patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF at high risk of cardiovascular events with the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) spironolactone reduces a composite of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), or atrial-synchronized biventricular (BiV) pacing, is an FDA-approved device therapy option for heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony. A traditional CRT device has pacing leads implanted within the right atrium (RA), the right ventricle (RV), and within a coronary vein overlying the lateral or posterior left ventricle (LV). Within the past decade, various multi-center randomized controlled trials have reported improved quality of life, aerobic exercise capacity, LV systolic function and structure, as well as decreased hospitalization rates and mortality among patients with HF. Despite improvements in CRT technology with multipoint pacing, quadripolar leads, and adaptive pacing algorithms, approximately 30% of patients do not clinically benefit and are considered non-responders. This study looks to optimize CRT device programming in patients considered non-responders to CRTusing information obtained from standard ECG machines, and to assess acute and chronic effects of CRT optimization using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate safety and performance of AquaPass System for enhancing fluid transfer through the skin, by increased sweat rate, in edematous patients.

Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a serious and progressive disease. Guidelines recommend surgical valve repair of severe TR in symptomatic patients. Despite its association with excess mortality and morbidity, TR has been relatively neglected and is severely undertreated. In particular this is because isolated tricuspid surgery remains associated with high mortality rates, and thus, patients with severe TR are often deemed inoperable due to severe co-morbidities and frailty. In recent years, percutaneous CE-mark approved techniques for transcatheter tricuspid valve treatment (TTVT) have emerged as alternatives to surgery. These include (I) transcatheter annuloplasty devices (Tricuspid Cardioband) and (II) transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TriClip, PASCAL). Several non-randomized studies suggested improved functional outcomes after TTVT, however, to data there is no evidence from randomized controlled trials addressing the actual efficacy of TTVT. The TRICuspid Intervention in Heart Failure trial (TRICI-HF trial) will assess the concept that TTVT will translate into a reduced morbidity and mortality. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 fashion to TTVT plus OMT (Experimental group) or OMT alone (Control group). TRICI-HF is an industry-independent, investigator-initiated strategy study and investigators may choose any suitable CE-marked percutaneous system "on-label" for TTVT.

The combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) is common and implies a poor prognosis. Pulmonary vein isolation is an established method for the treatment of symptomatic AF in patients with normal heart function and has been shown to be more effective than drug therapy. Recently, radiofrequency ablation has shown a positive effect in patients with AF and HF. POLAR-HF has been designed to investigate efficacy and safety of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and severe HF (LVEF ≤ 40%).

Study name: The comparison between spironolactone and indapamide monotherapy or in combination with amlodipine to reduce thr risk of heart failure (SIRRHF) Medicine: spironolactone (20mg/tablet), indapamide (1.5mg/tablet) and amlodipine (5mg/tablet). Rationale: Our hypothesis of the present trial is that spironolactone is superior to indapamide in cardiovascular prevention in hypertensive patients, with the possible addition of amlodipine. Before a clinical outcome trial is considered, the present feasibility trial is designed to compare the efficacy of antihypertensive regimens based on these two drugs on blood pressure and several measurements of organ damage. Objective: To evaluate the effects of spironolactone (either with or without amlodipine), in comparison with indapamide (either with or without amlodipine), on the extent of blood pressure reduction. Study design: Multi-center (five sites), prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point study with active treatment arm (study duration - 12 weeks) Study population: Men and Women aged over 45 years (n=200) meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Randomization and treatment: After stratification by centers, eligible patients will be randomly divided into two groups, taking spironolactone (20mg tablet) once a day or indapamide (1.5mg tablet) once a day. Spironolactone may be up-titrated to 40mg daily and indapamide may be up-titrated to 3mg daily at 4-week or 8-week visit. At 8-week visit, if needed, we will add amlodipine at 5 or 10 mg once daily. Follow up: 12 weeks. Sample size: a total of 200 patients should be enrolled in the combination. Timeline: After obtaining the approval of Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital in June 2020, recruitment will start. Patients enrollment will be performed between June 2020 to November 2020. All patients should be followed up before July 2021.

Background: Fluid overload, especially pulmonary congestion, is one of the main contributors into heart failure (HF) readmission risk and it is a clinical challenge for clinicians. The Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) system is a novel electromagnetic energy-based technology that can accurately quantify changes in lung fluid concentration noninvasively. Previous non-randomized studies suggest that ReDS-guided management has the potential to reduce readmissions in HF patients recently discharged from the hospital. Aims: To test whether a ReDS-guided strategy during HF admission is superior to the standard of care during a 1-month follow up. Methods: The ReDS-SAFE HF trial is an investigator-initiated, single center, single blind, 2-arm randomized clinical trial, in which ~240 inpatients with acutely decompensated HF at Mount Sinai Hospital will be randomized to a) standard of care strategy, with a discharge scheme based on current clinical practice, or b) ReDS-guided strategy, with a discharge scheme based on specific target value given by the device on top of the current clinical practice. ReDS tests will be performed for all study patients, but results will be blinded for treating physicians in the "standard of care" arm. The primary outcome will be a composite of unplanned visit for HF that lead to the use of intravenous diuretics, hospitalization for worsening HF, or death from any cause at 30 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes including the components of the primary outcome alone, length of stay, quality of life, time-averaged proportional change in the natriuretic peptides plasma levels, and safety events as symptomatic hypotension, diselectrolytemias or worsening of renal function. Conclusions: The ReDS-SAFE HF trial will help to clarify the efficacy of a ReDS-guided strategy during HF-admission to improve the short-term prognosis of patients after a HF admission.

The objective of this interventional study is to evaluate the safety and functional performance of the Nephronyx System in patients with ADHF, presenting clinical signs of volume overload and compromised response to diuretics.