
Evaluation of Clinical and Microbial Efficacy and Safety of AzaSite Compared to Tobramycin for Bacterial...
Bacterial ConjunctivitisThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and microbial efficacy and safety of AzaSite compared to tobramycin for bacterial conjunctivitis. Adults and children one year of age and older with bacterial conjunctivitis in at least one eye are eligible. Subjects will be randomly assigned to the AzaSite group or Tobramycin group. Three visits will be required for the study.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety Study With Oralgen Grass Pollen
Allergic RhinoconjunctivitisThis study is designed to give additional information on the efficacy, safety and local effects (tolerability) of a dose of sublingual immunotherapy administered once a day, during a second grass pollen season.

Safety Study of Grass Pollen-derived Peptides to Treat Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Seasonal Allergic RhinoconjunctivitisThe purpose of this study is to determine whether the oral administration of grass pollen peptides is safe and effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Evaluation of Efficacy of Ophthalmic Solution in Induced Allergic Conjunctivitis
Allergic ConjunctivitisThe purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy of R89674 0.25% ophthalmic solution compared with placebo in alleviating the signs and symptoms of conjunctival allergen challenge-induced allergic conjunctivitis

Evaluation of Brimonidine Tartrate/Ketotifen Fumarate Combination in Adults With Seasonal Allergic...
Seasonal Allergic ConjunctivitisTo evaluate the efficacy of Combo compared to its individual components and compared to vehicle in a population of subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

PMCF Study to Evaluate Performance and Safety of "Distilled Waters-based Eyedrops" Used to Relieve...
Dry EyeDry Eye Disease1 moreDry eye disease (DED), also called keratoconjunctivitis sicca, is a common ocular condition characterized by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film and inflammation of the ocular surface. The typical symptoms of DED include irritation, discomfort, blurred or fluctuating vision. Over the counter (OTC) artificial tears are typically the first line of dry eye treatment; they are meant to supplement the tears that cover the eye's surface. OTC products mimic the different layers of the tear film in order to maintain ocular hydration. Distilled waters of natural herbs such as Green Tea, Calendula, Chamomile, Hamamelis and Euphrasia are known for their soothing and refreshing properties. Thanks to the combined action of these natural elements, distilled waters-based eyedrops are particularly indicated to relieve eye dryness, irritation and redness of the eyes' mucosa caused by atmospheric agents, environmental factors, and/or use of contact lenses. "Distilled waters-based eyedrops" medical devices are ophthalmic solutions containing distilled waters able to relieve eye discomfort thanks to their soothing and refreshing action. For these reasons, an interventional, non-comparative, single-center Post Marketing Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study was planned to evaluate the performance and safety of "Distilled waters-based eyedrops" used as intended to relieve dry eye symptoms. The objectives of the PMCF study are confirmation of the performance, collection of additional safety data regarding expected adverse events and detection of potential unexpected adverse events associated with use of "Distilled waters-based eyedrops" according to the IFU. Each subject, after signing the Informed Consent Form, will enter the screening and baseline phase (the 2 visits will coincide) during which baseline procedures will be completed. At baseline visit (V0), one of the "Distilled waters-based eyedrops" products will be administered to the enrolled subject. The patient will perform 2 on site visits (V0 and V2/EOS). To monitor the safety, 1 phone contact is planned (V1) to check for potential adverse events and concomitant medications intake. The first administration and the intervals at which the treatment should be repeated, to be done as per Investigator judgment and according to the IFU, depend on various factors regarding the physiology of the patients (e.g. type of eye-tear film, anatomy, age), their lifestyle (e.g. use of computer, wearing of contact lenses).

ALLEVIATE Trial - A Phase 3 Trial in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis
Allergic ConjunctivitisA Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions in Subjects with Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis

Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of the Depigmented Modified Allergen Extract of Two Mites in Subjects...
RhinitisRhinoconjunctivitis1 moreThis is an open-label, non-controlled, non-randomised, prospective safety study in patients with rhinitis or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with controlled asthma, and clinically relevant sensitisation to dust mites from the Pyroglyphidae and Glycyphagidae families.

A Multi-Center Study Evaluating the Safety of AC-170 0.24%
Atopic Disease (Including Allergic Conjunctivitis)The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of AC-170 0.24% used twice daily in Healthy Adult Subjects and in Pediatric subjects with a history or family history of atopic disease (including allergic conjunctivitis).

Effectiveness of Olopatadine HCl Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis...
Allergic ConjunctivitisThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Olopatadine Hydrochloride (HCl) ophthalmic solution 0.1% versus Epinastine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.05% in a population of healthy, adult Japanese patients (20 years of age or older) with a history of allergic conjunctivitis to Japanese Cedar Pollen. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive Olopatadine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.1% in one eye and Epinastine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.05% in the fellow eye, after which a conjunctival allergy challenge (CAC) with Japanese cedar pollen will be performed.