Active clinical trials for "Conjunctivitis"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Olopatadine Hydrochloride (HCl) ophthalmic solution 0.1% versus Epinastine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.05% in a population of healthy, adult Japanese patients (20 years of age or older) with a history of allergic conjunctivitis to Japanese Cedar Pollen. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive Olopatadine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.1% in one eye and Epinastine HCl ophthalmic solution, 0.05% in the fellow eye, after which a conjunctival allergy challenge (CAC) with Japanese cedar pollen will be performed.

This is an open-label, non-controlled, non-randomised, prospective safety study in patients with rhinitis or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with controlled asthma, and clinically relevant sensitisation to dust mites from the Pyroglyphidae and Glycyphagidae families.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of AC-170 0.24% used twice daily in Healthy Adult Subjects and in Pediatric subjects with a history or family history of atopic disease (including allergic conjunctivitis).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of action of AC-170 0.24% compared to vehicle in the prevention of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model.

Study to Assess the Safety of Cat-PAD in Cat Allergic Paediatric Subjects

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the microbiological and clinical efficacy of Auriclosene compared to its vehicle for bacterial conjunctivitis. Adults and children one year of age and older with bacterial conjunctivitis in at least one eye may be eligible. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Auriclosene Ophthalmic Solution or Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution.

The investigators are conducting this study because the patient have an eye infection which is called adenoviral conjunctivitis, and is the most common cause of "pink eye". There is currently no treatment for this condition. However, the researchers associated with this study want to understand if using a product called Zirgan, which is a topical ointment that is already FDA-approved for other types of eye infections, will help with the type of infection that the patient currently have. Zirgan is not FDA-approved to treat your type of eye infection. Your participation in this study is expected to last 21 days but the patient will only apply the topical ointment for 14 of those days. During the study, the patient will be asked to come into this clinic 8 times. The purpose of this study is to determine whether topical Zirgan can reduce days that the patient suffers from the eye infection, and also to see if it can prevent the infection from spreading to your second eye and to also see if it can prevent the spreading of the infection to people that the patient come in close contact with. Zirgan will be compared to Genteal Gel in this trial. Genteal Gel is a non-prescription eye lubricant gel and is commonly used for treatment of dry eye. The patient will be asked to apply a topical ointment (either Zirgan or Genteal gel 5 times a day for the first 7 days and then 3 times a day for the following 7 days. The patient will be asked to return to the clinic 21 days after the patient starts the study for a final check-up. It is planned that about 80 people with Adenovirus Conjunctivitis will be enrolled in this study between 8-12 sites across the United States. The patient will be assigned to either Zirgan or Genteal gel by chance which is similar to flipping a coin. The study groups will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio. Neither the patient nor the study doctor or study staff will be able to pick which study group The patient is in. The patient will not know and the study doctor or study staff will not know which study group the patient is in. The study doctor or study staff can find out if it is necessary to know for your health. If this happens, the study doctor or study staff may not be able to tell the patient which study group the patient was in until everyone finishes the study.

Safety study of Depigoid vaccine Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus or 50% Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus / 50% Dermatophagoides farinae (500 DPP/ml), to treat allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma. Primary variable: number of subjects [%] who experienced at least one immediate or delayed systemic reaction of EAACI grade 2 or higher during the 4-month treatment period.

A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions in Subjects with Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis

A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Methodology Development Environmental Clinical Trial with Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solutions (0.25% and 0.5%) in Subjects with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis.