Active clinical trials for "Constipation"

Assessment of efficacy of Dicopeg Junior, compared to lactulose, in the treatment of functional constipation in children aged 6 months to 6 years. The basis of assessment is to compare the number of commissioned stools (more than three stools per week) and stool consistency according to the scale of Bristol, in children taking Dicopeg Junior and children treated with lactulose. Childrens who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized to one of two groups, in which the treatment will be as follows for 12 weeks: The first group - Dicopeg Junior (max. in 2 doses) in a dose of: weight up to 8 kg - 1 sachet per day weight 8 - 12 kg - 2 sachets a day weight 12 - 20 kg - 3 sachets a day weight> 20 kg - 4 sachets per day, The second group - Lactulose at 2 ml / kg / day (in two doses). Preparations: Dicopeg Junior and Lactulose will be administered orally for the duration of the study (12 weeks).

Constipation following elective Caesarean sections (CS) is a common problem experienced by up to 50% of patients (1). The causes for this are multifactorial and include manipulation of the bowel during surgery, immobilisation and opiate based anaesthetic and analgesic techniques. To try to alleviate the problem of postoperative constipation, some anaesthetists prescribe postoperative lactulose in addition to postoperative analgesia, although no data exists that shows whether this has any beneficial effect on postoperative constipation. 1. Short term morbidity associated with Caesarean delivery. Hillan EM. Birth. 19 (4): 190-4).

Determine the effectiveness of symbiotic LACTOFOS containing FOS and probiotics against placebo in patients with a diagnosis of constipation, comparing the average number of weekly evacuations in 2 (two) groups for 30 days.

Methylnaltrexone for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in the setting of palliative or hospice care, is significantly more effective than placebo (1). However, in both the randomized and the open-label phase of the multi center trial showing this favorable outcome, the drug produced rescue-free laxation in only about half of the patients (2). There may be several reasons for this result, since constipation in palliative care patients often has multiple simultaneously occurring causes. Assuming that constipation of the non-responders is still opioid-induced, one of the possible reasons for not responding to methylnaltrexone could be that central actions of opioids contribute to constipation by reducing motility of the intestines through direct actions in the spinal dorsal horn (2). However, as methylnaltrexone is a µ-receptor antagonist and not all opioids are solely µ-receptor agonists another reason may well be that successful laxation is determined by the receptor-profile of the specific opioid the patient is using. Opioids do not only influence bowel functioning, but also immune system functioning and angiogenesis. Methylnaltrexone possibly antagonizes these changes, therefore this study will also investigate the influence of methylnaltrexone on immunologic and angiogenic parameters.

Emptying disorders are of the most common causes of constipation. An adjustable toilet seat was designed by " Shva-Nach" Ltd company, and is designed to facilitate the angle sitting position. Its efficacy will be evaluated in the current study, on 50 volunteers who suffer from constipation and meet the Rome 3 criteria for constipation.

Looking for a modification of the cortical excitability of the motor area corresponding to the external anal sphincter after biofeedback sessions.

Purpose: To assess whether EMG directed biofeedback therapy or Botulinum toxin type A injection of the levator ani muscles has any effect on pain from the levator ani syndrome, and, in addition, to what extent either treatment is superior to the other in terms of anorectal physiologic measurements, and quality of life. Study Design: Randomized, prospective, unblinded double-armed study with crossover. Methodology: Female subjects, aged 18 and over, with painful levator ani muscle spasm for at least one month duration will be randomized to receive either biofeedback therapy or Botulinum toxin type A injection. After randomization they will all undergo visual analog pain scoring, anorectal manometry, colonoscopy (if clinically indicated), and self-reported SF-36 quality of life measurement. Each patient will also complete numerical pain scale scoring, an SF-36, and a satisfaction questionnaire at each treatment visit and follow-up visit. Patients will submit these by mail. Identification numbers will be assigned to each subject for use on the SF-36 and Satisfaction Questionnaires throughout the study. Subjects will again undergo anorectal manometry at the end of their treatment arms. In the biofeedback arm patients will be treated biweekly for up to eight treatments and be provided exercises to practice at home based on their muscle function noted during the biofeedback training session. Subjects will keep a treatment diary of the exercises they do at home to help ensure compliance with the protocol. In the Botulinum toxin injection arm patients will be treated with scheduled injections of the levator ani muscles every six weeks for up to three total injections of 100U each. These injections will be directed to the painful areas of the levator muscles as guided by physical exam and EMG measurements. Should any patient fail their initial randomized treatment assignment (failure defined as "very dissatisfied" or "dissatisfied" on the satisfaction questionnaire), they will then be allowed to cross over to the other study arm. In addition to numerical pain scale scoring, an SF-36 questionnaire and anorectal manometry will also be repeated at the time of crossover. We intend to include all randomized patients in the final data analysis (according to their originally assigned treatment arm), regardless of outcome or reason for dropout, thus making this an "intent-to-treat" analysis. Pivotal Study Definitions: The definition of adequate pain reduction, for the purposes of data analysis, will be a reduction in a subject's mean pain score of two on a numerical pain scale (0-10). Failure of either therapy will be defined as a response of "very dissatisfied" or "dissatisfied" on the satisfaction questionnaire at the end of either biofeedback (eight treatment visits) or Botulinum toxin (three injections) both before and after crossover. Outcomes: We will determine the following for biofeedback therapy and Botulinum toxin type A injection: mean pain reduction, any differences in anorectal physiologic measurements (such as mean resting anal sphincter pressure), any changes in self-reported quality of life, and overall patient satisfaction.

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the investigational drug DDP733 in treating female patients with IBS-c. A placebo control will be utilized.

Constipated patients in the participating center from February 2017 to June 2018 (anticipated) were prospectively enrolled. Number of defecation per week，Bristol score，and Colon transmission experiment were compared with the constipated patients before treatment.

The aim of the study is to confirm the effectiveness of chicory-derived prebiotic inulin-type fructans on bowel function in young children.