Active clinical trials for "Constriction, Pathologic"

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) often have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) which may adversely affect prognosis. There is uncertainty about the benefits and the optimal timing of revascularization for such patients. There is currently clinical equipoise regarding the management of concomitant CAD in patients undergoing TAVR. Some centers perform routine revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (either before or after TAVR), while others follow an alternative strategy of medical management. The potential benefits and optimal timing of PCI in these patients are unknown. As TAVR expands to lower risk patients, and potentially becomes the preferred therapy for the majority of patients with severe aortic stenosis, the optimal management of concomitant coronary artery disease will be of increasing importance. The COMPLETE TAVR study will determine whether, on a background of guideline-directed medical therapy, a strategy of complete revascularization involving staged PCI using drug eluting stents to treat all suitable coronary artery lesions is superior to a strategy of medical therapy alone in reducing the composite outcome of Cardiovascular Death, new Myocardial Infarction, Ischemia-driven Revascularization or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina or Heart Failure. The study will be a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial with blinded adjudication of outcomes. Patients will be screened and consented for elective transfemoral TAVR and randomized within 96 hours of successful balloon expandable TAVR. Complete Revascularization: Staged PCI using third generation drug eluting stents to treat all suitable coronary artery lesions in vessels that are at least 2.5 mm in diameter and that are amenable to treatment with PCI and have a ≥70% visual angiographic diameter stenosis. Staged PCI can occur any time from 1 to 45 days post successful transfemoral TAVR. Vs. Medical Therapy Alone: No further revascularization of coronary artery lesions. All patients, regardless of randomized treatment allocation, will receive guideline-directed medical therapy consisting of risk factor modification and use of evidence-based therapies. The COMPLETE TAVR study will help address the current lack of evidence in this area. It will likely impact both the global delivery of health care and the management and clinical outcomes of all patients undergoing TAVR with concomitant CAD.

More advanced and severe cases of chronic lower limb ischemia (the so-called critical lower limb ischemia) are painful and limiting conditions that impact on patients' quality of life. Until now, the available evidence for the femoropopliteal area only defines open surgery or endovascular treatment indications. However, the best strategy for endovascular procedures is still unclear. The popliteal artery is a challenging anatomical site for balloon angioplasty alone and standard nitinol stenting angioplasty. This randomized clinical trial aims to assess the superiority of nitinol stent angioplasty compared to pharmacoactive balloon angioplasty to treat critical lower limb ischemia due to popliteal artery arteriosclerosis.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with concomitant non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and extracranial/intracranial artery stenosis. Participants will be 1:1 randomized into anticoagulation alone or anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy. The primary endpoint is composite events 3 months after enrollment.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of minimally invasive decompression and fusion over the traditional open decompression and fusion in patients with single-level lumbar stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. Postoperative follow-up will continue for 12 months. Сlinical, safety, radiological and cost-effectiveness endpoints will be evaluated.

Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a well-known complication of central venous catheterization, especially after insertion of temporary hemodialysis catheters (tHDC). Incidence and prevalence differ between studies, and exact figures are hard to tell since proper venographies seldom are performed unless the patient is symptomatic. Most tHDC are placed in the jugular or femoral veins as catheters in the subclavian veins have been shown to result in CVS to a greater degree. However, some studies are equivocal and there are several advantages with the subclavian vein such as a lower risk for infectious and thrombotic complications, longer durability (thereby avoiding placement of a new catheter with repeated tissue trauma), increased comfort during insertion and use, less effect on blood flow if the patient moves the head, easier to mobilize. The studies on CVS incidence originate from the 1990s when ultrasound-guided insertions were unheard of and polyurethane catheters were prevalent. The investigators believe that there is less tissue trauma when using ultrasound guidance in real-time. Furthermore, CVS is less common when silicone catheters are used instead of polyurethane catheters. To avoid unnecessary vascular trauma and patient suffering, any pre-existing CVS should ideally be detected before cannulation attempts. A CT scan of the chest with IV contrast is preferred, but this exposes the patient to ionized radiation, is time-consuming and (although debated) may cause contrast-induced nephropathy. A brief ultrasound examination to verify central venous patency would be useful provided it is shown to have an adequate sensitivity for stenosis detection.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrythmia encountered in clinical practice and patients suffer from this are at increased risk of ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism due to the formation and embolism of left atrial thrombi. Current international guidelines recommend non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for stroke prevention amongst these patients with non-valvular AF at significant ischemic stroke risk, given the superior safety and comparable efficacy of NOACs over warfarin. However, warfarin therapy remains in the stroke prevention strategy for AF patients with mitral stenosis (MS) as NOACs lack of evidence for safety and efficacy amongst this group of patients. A local study is initiated to compare and evaluate the safety and efficacy among the two groups of anticoagulants - NOACs and traditional Warfarin therapy - in AF patients with underlying moderate to severe MS.

In the symptomatic ischemic stroke, the decision-making of medical treatment plus intracranial stenting (IS) has been more and more popular, especially in patients with intracranial large severe stenosis or occlusive artery. Nonetheless, there were few evidences evaluating the comprehensive information of the other self-expanding stent relating IS procedure after positive results of the Wingspan Stent System Post Market Surveillance (WEAVE) trial and Wingspan One Year Vascular Imaging Events and Neurologic Outcomes (WOVEN) study about Wingspan stent. The aim of our study was to investigate whether IS with Credo stent would improve the adverse events during 1-year follow-up.

Carotid revascularization for primary prevention of stroke (CREST-2) is two independent multicenter, randomized controlled trials of carotid revascularization and intensive medical management versus medical management alone in patients with asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. One trial will randomize patients in a 1:1 ratio to endarterectomy versus no endarterectomy and another will randomize patients in a 1:1 ratio to carotid stenting with embolic protection versus no stenting. Medical management will be uniform for all randomized treatment groups and will be centrally directed.

This is a randomized control trial aimed to decreased radiation-induced vaginal stenosis in patients with endometrial or cervical cancer treated with post-operative external beam radiation therapy with or without brachytherapy. The intervention is an enhanced vaginal dilator model, including a silicone band placed at the desired depth of dilator insertion. The new model will be compared against the traditional vaginal dilator model used as our institutional standard of care. We hypothesize the enhanced model will improve adherence, correct use and efficacy of vaginal dilator use.

The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of the olfactory mucosa-derived mesenchymal stem cells based therapy for the patients with chronic laryngeal and tracheal stenosis