Active clinical trials for "Coronary Restenosis"

The present case-control study is designed to investigate the disease characteristics of IR-CAD by comparing the demographics, clinical features, lab results, imaging findings, and prior treatment between 20 patients with IR-CAD and 10 patients with AS-CAD.

Since the advent of coronary stents, in-stent restenosis has proven to be the major limitation of interventional cardiology, occurring in as many as 30% of patients. Drug-eluting stents are specifically designed to prevent the problem of in-stent restenosis. They consist of a selective anti-proliferative drug, sirolimus, a controlled-release polymer, and a closed-cell stent delivery platform. Upon placement, sirolimus elutes into the vessel wall and stops the process of neointimal hyperplasia, thereby significantly reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis. The study "Prevention of Coronary Restenosis" examines the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with coronary stenosis. The goal of the study is to examine whether the guideline-supported implantation of SES, despite the higher initial cost, improves the quality and economic outcomes of the treatment of patients with coronary stenosis. Secondarily, the study evaluates patient quality of life, impairment of daily activities, re-intervention rate, as well as an account of the utilisation and benefits of the implemented standardised guidelines. In this prospective, multi-centre, country-wide cohort study, 658 patients undergoing an implantation of a SES for treatment of coronary stenosis were recruited from 35 hospital centres. Their treatment and outcomes will be evaluated over a 3-year period by means of standardised questionnaires. In addition, information obtained from the patients will be confirmed and augmented by telephone interviews with the attending physicians involved in their follow-up care. In order to appraise the effect of the new therapy, a comparison cohort group of 394 patients receiving a BMS was recruited. These patients will be evaluated and observed by the same method as those patients receiving a drug-eluting stent, also over 3 years

In a previous randomized comparison oral sirolimus plus bare metal stent compared to bare metal stent implantation alone demonstrated at one year of follow up a significant reduction of angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis (ANMAT resolution number 3366 from June 2004 and Rodriguez A et al JACC,2006,47,1522-1529). In addition previous reported registries from our group with Drug Eluting Stents showed similar amount of reduction in clinical parameters (not angiographic)of restenosis (ERACI III, Rodriguez A et al EuroIntervention 2006,2:53-60). Taking in account that 8.3% of patients treated with oral rapamycin plus Bare Metal Stents(ORAR II Trial JACC 2006)and 8.8% of patients treated with DES developed clinical restenosis (ERACI III Registry, EuroIntervention 2006) the investigators sought to compare differences in overall cost with both revascularization strategies at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years of follow up assuming that safety and efficacy clinical end points would be similar.

Rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other. Objective: To investigate whether the clinical outcome is similar after implantation of the Promus Element versus the Resolute Integrity stent (non-inferiority hypothesis). Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized single-blinded study. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. Intervention: In patients who are eligible for DES implantation, the type of DES implanted will be randomized (Resolute Integrity stent versus Promus Element stent). At the start of the study, both DES will also be used in routine clinical practice. Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of target vessel failure at one year follow-up. Target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite endpoint consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Further secondary clinical and angiographic endpoints will be investigated, defined in accordance with suggestions of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). Of note, the angiographic assessment is based on clinically indicated projections only and results in no additional x-ray exposure. There is no routine angiographic follow-up. If angiographic data are available in patients who undergo symptom-driven re-catheterization, we will analyze these data to get insight into the mechanisms of potential DES restenosis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will receive the routine clinical treatment. As a consequence, the risks of this trial do not exceed the risks of any routine PCI procedure.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that a BioFreedom™ Drug Coated Stent is non-inferior to a bare metal stent at one year as measured by the composite safety endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and definite/probable stent thrombosis, and that its efficacy is superior to a bare metal stent as measured by clinically driven TLR at one year.

To evaluate the effect of celecoxib use for 3 month after drug-eluting stent implantation on restenosis on clinical outcome such as target lesion revascularization, thrombotic event, myocardial infarction, death on inflammatory biomarkers

The purpose of the present study is to provide the first in-human safety and efficacy evaluations of systemic oral anti-proliferative Everolimus therapy compared to placebo in patients treated by bare metal stents for significant coronary artery disease. The aim is to reduce Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACEs) including death, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to the target vessel, Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization within the first 6 months after intervention. Additionally safety and tolerability of Everolimus at the selected dose in this patient population will be analyzed.

Use of SeQuent® Please drug coated balloon (DCB) is effective to treat patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, whether the type of pre-dilatation balloon prior to DCB dilatation impacts on clinical and angiographic outcomes or not is unknown. Lacrosse® Non-slip element balloon (NSE) is a balloon catheter with 3 longitudinal plastic elements which are attached to proximal and distal balloon edges. NSE is developed to incise neointimal tissue and avoid balloon slippage without vitiating balloon derivability and crossability. We investigated angiographic and clinical outcomes following normal non-compliant balloon or NSE dilatation prior to DCB dilatation in ISR lesions.This study is a single blinded, multicenter, randomized trial. Total 200 patients with ISR are randomly assigned to treat with non-compliant balloon or NSE before DCB dilatation. Optical coherence tomographic (OCT) analysis are performed before pre-dilatation and after DCB dilatation Follow-up angiography analysis are planned at 8 months in all patients. Clinical follow-up is planned at 8 and 24 months.Primary endpoint is angiographic in-segment late loss at 8 months.

The aim of the study is to choose an optimal stent and to get further knowledge about the mechanisms of the engraftment of a stent. The occurrence of a hyperplasia of neointima can be minimized by application of a coated stent and a concurrent safety four weekly dual thrombocytes therapy

The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.