Active clinical trials for "COVID-19"

A clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of oral tafenoquine compared to placebo in patients with mild to moderate COVID 19 disease and low risk of disease progression (the "ACLR8-LR" study).

To evaluate the safety, humoral immunogenicity, cellular immunogenicity and immune persistence following a heterologous booster dose of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trivalent vaccine (CHO Cell) LYB002 in Chinese adults 18 years and above completed three-dose Inactivated COVID-19 vaccine;

There is an increased lack of short- and long-term real-life effectiveness and safety data on new oral antivirals authorised and commercialised to treat COVID-19. To date, only two clinical trials have been published with data on the efficacy and safety of the use of the Paxlovid® and Lagevrio®. Since there is a public health, political, social and economic pressure to prevent severity, hospitalisation and death from COVID-19, monitoring the effectiveness and safety of commercialised oral antiviral therapies against COVID-19 has become emergent pharmacovigilance and public health task. The objective of the study is to monitor the post-marketing safety and effectiveness of the new oral antivirals indicated for the treatment of COVID-19, namely Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid®) and Molnupiravir (Lagevrio®), having as holders of the Authorization of Market introduction to Pfizer Europe MA EEIG and Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V., respectively.

SARS-CoV-2 is a highly transmissible and pathogenic coronavirus that emerged in late 2019 and has caused a pandemic of acute respiratory disease, collectively known as COVID-19. Given the relatively short duration of protection after vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection and the evolution of immune-evading strains, it is likely that the population will have to be repeatedly boosted until a "universal" Pan-Sarbecovirus vaccine is available. SARS-CoV-2 protein subunit vaccine candidates have shown that, despite adjuvantation, their safety/reactogenicity profile seems to be preferable over mRNA or vectored vaccines, whilst inducing non-inferior immune responses (1,2). In this regard, serious adverse events of special interest from mRNA vaccines seem to be have been substantially underestimated/underreported. In a preliminary analysis by an International consortium, the true incidence seems to be 1,250/million excess risk in vaccinees instead of the 1-2/million reported by the Department of Health and Human Services (3,4). Additionally, in a recent study, the Clover SCB-2019 protein subunit vaccine candidate has shown higher neutralizing antibodies titers against the omicron variant, when compared to an inactivated vaccine (data not published yet). Although Brazil has various vaccine platforms authorized for emergency use or licensed, such as mRNA vaccines, vector-based vaccines, inactivated vaccines, so far Brazil has no access to adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted protein-based vaccines. This study will involve two vaccines registered in Brazil and a protein-based adjuvanted vaccine candidate, SCB-2019/Clover. Protein-based adjuvanted vaccines have the advantage of being from a known and licensed technology that can produce high quantities of vaccine at reasonable Costs of Goods. Protein-based adjuvanted vaccines have also been shown to be highly immunogenic, both in the context of COVID-19 (2,5) and other licensed vaccines (6), with long persistence of immunity and protection. Over 80% of the Brazilian population above the age of 18 years have received a full primary vaccination and another 7% at least one dose of vaccine. The overall booster coverage is about 48% (64% of the adults) (7). Anvisa has authorized 1st and 2nd booster doses of various vaccines in line with the MoH policy which was last updated in March 2022. It can be speculated that, like in other geographies, a third booster will be recommended soon, especially to at risk populations and in the scenario of high circulation of the Omicron BA.5 strain. This study will explore the immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of a booster dose of various platforms in fully primed individuals regardless of the number of booster doses they have received prior to the enrollment in the study. This mimics the "real world scenario" at vaccination centers where individuals with different background vaccination schemes show up for "a booster". It would facilitate logistics of immunization substantially if vaccines for boosting, independent of the immunization status, could be interchangeable with respect to safety/reactogenicity and immunogenicity. This study will enroll fully-primed individuals (2 doses of either Pfizer mRNA or Oxford/AZ/Fiocruz or Sinovac/Butantan or 1 dose of Janssen vaccine) who have received their last vaccine dose at least 4 months prior to study entry and who have received either no booster, or 1 or 2 boosters. Individuals will be stratified in cohorts by number of boosters and then randomized to receive one of 3 booster vaccines (AstraZeneca/Fiocruz, Pfizer/Wyeth, SCB-2019/Clover).

The safety and immunogenicity of AdCLD-CoV19-1 OMI (5.0x10^10 VP (0.5 mL)/dose/Vial) administered as a booster in healthy adults aged 19 years old and above will be evaluated.

The COVID-19 pandemic, a disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has generated an inexplicable scenario for global health, causing different complications and degrees of functional impairment in millions of people who manage to recover from the disease. The respiratory system is the main system to be directly impacted during COVID-19 infection, and its treatment can generate changes in the respiratory function of individuals surviving the exacerbation of the disease, which may promote subjective and quantitative changes in the respiratory pattern, requiring an evaluation with high-cost instruments, an evaluation necessary to outline a better planning therapeutic for this population. The goal of this study is evaluate the breathing pattern variables using a device called RESPIRATORY DIAGNOSTIC ASSISTANT (RDA) and verify the relationship between the breathing pattern variables with the variables of pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength and respiration in patients after involvement by COVID-19. This is a observational and validation study, prospective with follow-up of respiratory function for 6 months, a subproject linked to the project already approved by the research ethics committee under opinion: 4.362.977/4.596.02. Data collection will be carried out in a single day and divided into a few steps that will take place at the cardiopulmonary physiotherapy laboratory located at the physiotherapy department of the Federal University of Pernambuco. The first step is to conduct an interview with the participants to collect clinical data and perform a physical examination. Subsequently, a multidimensional evaluation of respiratory function will be performed. Statistical analysis will be performed using the Statistical Package For Social Science (SPSS) software version 20.0 for Windows. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to verify the type of distribution, regarding the normality of the variables, and the significance level adopted will be 95% (α <0.05) for all analyses. Finally, the data obtained will be presented in tables and/or graphs.

Knowing that the vaccine antigen includes the ACE2 binding moiety (RBD), the hypothesis is that circulating vaccine antigen could reduce the enzymatic activity of ACE2, and thus increase circulating AngII concentration, monocyte ROS production and lymphocyte apoptosis. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the Spike protein of SARSCoV-1, which uses the same receptor as SARS-CoV-2, induces a decrease in expression and activation of the Angiotensin II pathway in mice (Kuba et al. 2005).

This is an open-label Phase 3 study evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of Novavax vaccine(s) with Matrix-M™ adjuvant (ancestral strain NVX-CoV2373 and an alternative strain and/or multivalent Novavax vaccine) as booster doses following a series of primary and booster doses of authorized/approved mRNA vaccines followed by a single booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 in the Novavax 2019nCoV-307 study (Study 307).

Dyspnea is defined by a subjective sensation of respiratory discomfort, the intensity of which varies according to the terrain, the anamnesis and the cause. Resuscitation is associated with many causes of dyspnea, including initial distress, mechanical ventilation, or after-effects following the pathology and its management. Respiratory distress is the most severe form of impaired lung function. It is the first cause of hospitalization in intensive care. This distress, indicative of the failure of the respiratory system, is always severe and potentially fatal. It therefore constitutes an absolute therapeutic emergency. Dyspnea is often the revealing symptom of the condition and the urgency surrounding its management is an additional factor of concern for the patient. As a result, dyspnea is a pejorative element associated with severity or even death. In patients surviving the initial condition, dyspnea persists and can be found months or even years later, despite the initial rehabilitation. It is strongly associated with anxiety or even the fear of dying and contributes to the occurrence of post-traumatic stress syndromes. This persistent sensation of respiratory discomfort, limiting the patient's autonomy in his activities of daily living, seems to be able to reduce his quality of life. In addition, the perpetuation of this dyspnea could favor a spiral of deconditioning causing a progressive deterioration of the cardio-respiratory system justifying new hospitalizations. In patients with chronic respiratory failure, exercise rehabilitation supervised by hysiotherapists allows, in addition to improving autonomy, a significant reduction in dyspnoea, thus increasing the quality of life of these patients. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect at 2 years of 3 modes of management of dyspnea: exercise rehabilitation, standard physiotherapy and "usual care" on post-resuscitation dyspnea in patients with presented with severe COVID-19.

The purpose of this study is to describe the long-term health effects of COVID-19 in a population of mostly Black and Latinx individuals and their households who were diagnosed with COVID-19 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. In New York, the upper Manhattan and south Bronx communities neighboring Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) have been two of the most impacted communities of the COVID-19 pandemic. These neighborhoods are predominantly non-Hispanic black or African American and Latinx. This study will invite people who tested positive for COVID-19 and/or were treated at Columbia University Irving Medical Center to: 1) take a survey to ask about current symptoms and any health problems and 2) ask permission to review COVID-related health history including COVID-19 testing results (from the medical record) since infection to learn about health effects after COVID-19 infection; 3) invite anyone in their household to take a survey; and 4) for up to 500 patients who were hospitalized for COVID, give the option of doing a nasal swab to test for SARS-CoV-2 virus and blood test to check for antibody up to 12 months after diagnosis, to compare how results are different 12 months after infection. The goal is to learn about how the severity of person's infection in 2020 influences long term health effects and how others in their household are impacted by COVID-19.