Active clinical trials for "Dentin Sensitivity"

Objective: The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate low-level laser (LLL) therapy in tooth sensitivity and in effecting color change after in-officer bleaching treatment across three weeks of treatment. Methods: Twenty-one volunteers were evaluated through the split-mouth model, so that the right and left maxillary/mandibular quadrants were randomized and allocated to one of two groups: GPLACEBO - the laser tip was positioned without the emission of light (placebo effect) + tooth bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP); GLASER - treated with LLL + tooth bleaching with 35% HP. To assess tooth sensitivity, a modified visual analogue scale (VAS) was used after an evaporative stimulus (stimulated pain) and a daily pain questionnaire (unstimulated pain) was also applied. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the color. Three bleaching sessions were performed, with intervals of 7 days. Sensitivity results were tested using Friedman test for intra-group evaluation and Wilcoxon test for inter-group evaluation and ANOVA for color change.

This randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blind trial aims to evaluate the effect of glutaraldehyde associated or not with 37% phosphoric acid conditioning on dentin hypersensitivity reduction after non-surgical periodontal treatment, and its durability after 15 and 30 days. desensitizing treatment. Additionally, investigate the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life. The investigators selected patients who, after scraping and planing procedures, presented at least 2 teeth meeting the following inclusion criteria: presence of gingival recession without or with a periodontal pocket up to 5mm probing depth, which presented painful sensitivity response to tactile stimulus. and evaporative. Subjects were randomized into 3 groups: Placebo Group (GP) - Placebo Gel application followed by Placebo solution (distilled water); GPG- Placebo Gel application followed by application 5% aqueous glutaraldehyde solution; GSG - Application of 37% phosphoric acid followed by 5% aqueous glutaraldehyde solution. The sensitivity of the dental elements was evaluated by pain stimuli (tactile and evaporative) with the aid of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A questionnaire was applied to patients with the objective of capturing psychosocial experiences, prior to treatment and one month after its completion, to assess the impact of desensitizing treatment on health-related quality of life. Data will be collected and appropriate statistical tests will be applied.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of three desensitizing toothpastes for immediate and intermediate-term relief of CDH, when compared with a control toothpaste. One hundred and thirty-eight hypersensitive teeth were diagnosed and randomized into four groups according to the therapeutic agent of each desensitizing cream tested: 1) strontium acetate and calcium carbonate, 2) calcium carbonate and arginine 8%, 3) calcium phosphate nanoparticles and 4) a control toothpaste. The desensitizing creams were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cervical dentin hypersensitivity was assessed at baseline, immediately, 24 hours and 30 days after the treatment. Cold and evaporative tests were used to assess the sensitivity level.

Objective: The purpose of this randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of MI paste in reducing sensitivity associated vital bleaching. Methods: 45 subjects were randomly divided into two groups, based upon which arch received MI Paste. Group 1 bleached Maxillary arch, Group 2 bleached mandibular arch. Two weeks later subjects stopped bleaching the first arch and started second arch. Sensitivity was measured by VAS daily log scale for two weeks. Shade was taken with colorimeter and Classic Vita shade guide at baseline, immediate post-bleaching, and two weeks post-bleaching. Longitudinal sensitivity over the 14 days period of bleaching was summarized. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to compare summary measures.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHrQoL) in participants suffering from Dentinal Hypersensitivity (DH) symptoms following the use of anti-sensitivity toothpaste for 24 weeks.

The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three kinds of commercially available desensitizing agents: Gluma, Sheildforce plus, and Telio CS desensitizers in reducing the pre- and post-cementation sensitivity for full coverage restorations.

This double-blind randomized clinical trial evaluated the effect of 1.5% potassium oxalate on pain sensitivity control and color change after home tooth whitening. It also evaluated the influence of potassium oxalate on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and on the degree of patient satisfaction after bleaching treatment.

Background: Dentine hypersensitivity (DH) causes considerable pain and discomfort to an individual due to number of stimuli on exposed dentine. Different kinds of treatment strategies are used in the resolution of dentine hypersensitivity including the use of propolis and dentine bonding agent. No study had compared the efficacy of propolis and dentine bonding agent. Objective: The objective of the study was to find out whether there is a difference in the efficacy of Propolis and seventh generation dentine bonding agent in reducing the dentine hypersensitivity. Comparison within the groups and pairwise comparisons were also recorded in reducing dentine hypersensitivity. Methods: In this six month In- Vivo single blinded randomized clinical study, a total number of 52 patients with complain of dentine hypersensitivity were selected in two groups after taking informed consent. Group A and B received 30% ethanolic extract of propolis and dentine bonding agents respectively by a trained operator. Recordings of dentine hypersensitivity were obtained at Day 0, before and after the application of experimental agents, and also on Day 7, 15 and 30 by the principal investigator. Response was measured by Visual Analog Scale and Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used to analyze the data with level of significance set at p < 0.05. Friedman test was applied to see the comparison within groups and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for Pairwise comparison. Mann Whitney U-Test was applied for comparison between groups.

This will be multi-centered, triple blinded, randomized, four parallel treatments assigned study to compare clinical efficacy of commercially available dentifrices with placebo for immediate and sustained relief from Dentin Hypersensitivity after short term use. Condition or disease: Dentin hypersensitivity Intervention/Treatment: Product 1; Fluoro-Calcium-Phospho-silicate based BioMin F Product 2; Pro-Argin formula based Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief Product 3; Strontium Acetate based Sensodyne Rapid Action Product 4; Sodium Fluoride based Colgate Total

This study will compare clinically the efficacy, time to action and duration of different treatments for patients with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) that caused dentin hypersensitivity (DH).