Active clinical trials for "Dentin Sensitivity"

The objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the effect of the whitening treatment performed with the violet LED light (405-410 nm), with or without a bleaching gel, on the tooth color changes (immediate and long-term), tooth sensitivity, satisfaction of participants in relation to the technique and impact on their quality of life. After being informed of the objectives of the study, 200 participants will be selected and randomly divided into a treatment group (n = 25): G1 - 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) (4 sessions, 1 session/week); G2 - 30% carbamide peroxide (CP) (4 sessions, 1 session/week); G3 - Violet LED (405-410 nm, 4 sessions, 1 session/week); G4 - Violet LED (405-410 nm, 4 sessions, 2 sessions/week); G5 - Violet LED associated to 35% hydrogen peroxide (4 sessions, 1 session / week); G6 - Violet LED associated to 30% carbamide peroxide (4 sessions, 1 session / week); G7 - hybrid technique HP (Violet LED + application of 35% hydrogen peroxide + violet LED) (4 sessions, 1 session/week); G8 - Hybrid technique CP HP (Violet LED + application of 30% carbamide peroxide + violet LED) (4 sessions, 1 session/week). The color evaluation will be performed at predetermined times (before and immediately after treatment, 14 days after completion of bleaching and 3, 6 and 12 months after completion of bleaching), and quantitatively evaluated by colorimetric tests (objective and subjective) and spectrophotometry. In addition, it will be evaluated the tooth sensitivity during and after (48 hours) tooth whitening (VAS Scale), satisfaction with the treatment and impact on quality of life (OHIP-14 questionnaire). The data, except for survey data of satisfaction (descriptive evaluation), will be subjected to statistical analysis to determine the homogeneity and normality of the sample and for comparison between treatment groups, considering a 5% significance level.

Objectives: This study will determine the clinical efficacy of bleaching agent 37% carbamide peroxide compared to 35% hydrogen peroxide on the change of color scores in anterior superior teeth, in-office bleaching technique after 7, 14 and 37 days; and the Risk to the tooth sensitivity before, during and 24 hours after the procedure. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients will be selected for this single-blind, parallel, randomized-controlled clinical trial. The whitening treatment with 37% carbamide peroxide or 35% hydrogen peroxide (control) will be carried out in a single application of 45 minutes for two sessions with a 7-day interval. The sensitivity level will be assessed before, during and 24 hours after the procedure using verbal and analogic visual analogue (VAS) scales. Color alteration will be assessed by a bleach guide scale 7 days after each session and 30 days after the last session. Relative risk to sensitivity will be calculated and adjusted by session; while comparison of overall risk will performed by McNemar's test. Data on the sensitivity level for both scales will be subjected to the Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05). The color change will be measured with a spectrophotometer using the CIE L * a * b * and the L*, a * and b * parameter delta data, and ΔE and Δ00, will be individually subjected to two-way repeated measures ANOVA test to compare the two bleaching techniques at each evaluation time (α = 0.05).

Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) can be defined as acute, short-duration pain from open dentin tubules in exposed dentin. The symptom of DH is subjective and varies from patient to patient and may present as mild discomfort or as a high-intensity pain, which can affect the individual's quality of life, interfering with their eating and hygiene habits. One approach to treatment would be the use of agents that chemically desensitize sensory nerves, blocking the transmission of nerve stimuli to the central nervous system. The effectiveness of desensitizing treatments is influenced by several factors present in the oral cavity, which can contribute to a greater effect of these agents but can also be responsible for removing them from the dental surface. To date, studies have been carried out in the short term, not exceeding an average period of 12 weeks, so there is no consensus on the technique or agent that will guarantee the most effective and lasting effect against DH, not even the ideal period for reapplication. Thus, more studies are needed to assess the clinical behavior of desensitizing products on the market, especially the most recent releases. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clinically compare the effectiveness of different office treatments for DH, being ClinproTM White Varnish, ClinproTM XT Varnish, and a control group (placebo) through pain assessment with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), after stimulation with air from the triple syringe.

The purpose of this study is to support long-term dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) relief claims of 0.454 percent (%) stannous fluoride (SnF2) containing toothpastes in China.

Objectives: The aim of this in vivo randomized clinical trial with split-mouth design was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of one in-office application of a fluoride containing varnish and in office application of a bonding resin in adult patients presenting with dentin hypersensitivity. Materials and Methods: The study cohort consisted of 38 Caucasian outpatients, giving a total of 180 teeth were treated by fluoride varnish (FV) and 160 - by bonding agent (BA). Baseline pain in FV group was slightly higher on both scales (SCHIFF and VAS). Outcome measurements were assessed one or two weeks before product application (enrollment), at baseline at the application days (end of the run-in period: T0a, T0b, T0c), and at 1 week and at 1-2-6 months after first treatment.

This study investigated the effects of the association of strontium chloride with photobiomodulation on the dental bleaching process, testing the hypothesis that they may control dental sensitivity post-bleaching teeth.

This will be a double-blind, randomized, three-arm parallel groups study of the effect of toothpastes containing Ca-hydroxyapatite (HAP), Mg-Zn-hydroxyapatite (Zn-Mg-HAP), or fluoroapatite (FAP). The aim of the study is to compare the effect of toothpastes containing Ca-hydroxyapatite (HAP), fluoroapatite (FAP), and Mg-Zn-hydroxyapatite (Mg-Zn-HAP) on dentin hypersensitivity associated with dental abrasion. Materials and methods. Thirty consent patients aged 35-45 with dentin hypersensitivity associated with abrasion will be recruited for the study. The study will have 2 phases: preparatory phase (recruitment of the patients, standardization of their oral hygiene protocols, wash-out period, calibration of the researchers and training) and the main part (double-blind, randomized, parallel groups study of toothpastes effect). Patients will be randomly divided into 3 groups (group 1 - toothpastes with Ca-HAP, group 2 - toothpastes with Zn-Mg-HAP, group 3 - toothpastes with FAP). Clinical examination will be performed at the baseline, after 2 and 4 weeks, and will include patient's interview, oral hygiene level assessment (OHI-S), and dentin sensitivity testing (Shiff's index). The null hypothesis is that there will be no statistically significant differences in dentin sensitivity level between the study groups.

Periodontal instrumentation aims to remove plaque and calculus from the root surface. Both manual and ultrasonic instruments have been used for such decontamination; however, establishing a healthy periodontium can result in adverse effects, such as dentin hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of hand or ultrasonic instrumentation on dentin hypersensitivity in patients undergoing non-surgical periodontal treatment. For this controlled clinical trial of a "split mouth" design, 14 patients were selected with homologous teeth in the incisor to premolar region and probing depth ≥ 5 mm on the buccal aspect of the teeth. One side (control) was instrumented with hand instruments and the other side (test) with ultrasonic instruments. Dentin hypersensitivity was assessed in the baseline and during the follow 4 weeks after treatment, with a periodontal probe scratching the root surface and with an air jet. The patient's response was detected by a visual analog scale (VAS) of 10 cm.

Here we assessed the clinical effectiveness of Gluma, fluoride varnish, and the Tetric N-Bond one-step self-etch system in alleviating DH instantly and over 1 month, after a single topical application.A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted on 55 patients (25 males, 30 females; age: 20-49 years). Seventy teeth were randomly assigned to three groups: Gluma (n = 24); fluoride varnish (n = 23); and Tetric N-Bond adhesive (n = 23). Sensitivity to tactile, air blast, and cold stimuli were investigated.. A visual analogue scale was used to assess tactile stimuli, and the Schiff Cold Scale to assess air blast and cold stimuli. DH was evaluated immediately post-treatment, and at the 2-week and 1-month follow-up. Between-group and within-group comparisons were made.

This randomized, controlled, clinical trial aimed to compare the 6- month clinical performance of a desensitizer that contains calcium phosphate TM with a two-step self-etch adhesive SE and placebo (distilled water). At least 150 teeth wil be treated with desensitizing products and placebo randomly one third usig TM, one third using SE and one third using placebo. The efficiency of the materials will be evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment.