Type 1 Diabetes Management Using a Very Low Carbohydrate Versus Standard Diet
Type1diabetesDespite major technological advances, management of type one diabetes mellitus (T1D) remains suboptimal, putting millions of people at risk for immediate and long-term complications. After meals, a mismatch between carbohydrate absorption rate and insulin action typically leads to alternating periods of hyper- and hypoglycemia. A conceptually promising approach to control both problems is dietary carbohydrate restriction to reduce postprandial blood glucose changes and insulin needs. In a prior survey study, the investigators documented exceptional glycemic control (HbA1c 5.67%) and low acute complication rates among 316 children and adults with T1D consuming a very-low-carbohydrate diet. To test the feasibility of this approach, the investigators will conduct a randomized-controlled feeding study involving 32 adults and adolescents with T1D. Participants will be randomized to receive a very low carbohydrate vs. standard carbohydrate diet. Participants will be in the study for 12 weeks and receive all their meals by meal delivery.They will share continuous glucose monitoring data with the study team and be in close communication to adjust insulin doses as needed. All participants will have a screening visit, an individual or group education session, and 3 study visits to evaluate diabetes control and metabolic health. Some of these visits will have a fasting blood draw. Two of the visits will also comprise additional metabolic studies to assess glucagon response and brain function during hypoglycemia by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Participants will have IV catheters placed and receive IV insulin to drop blood glucose levels to 50 mg/dl for up to 30 minutes. The primary outcome will be HbA1c change from baseline. Secondary outcomes include detailed measures of glycemic variability, metabolic health, and quality of life.
Very Low Carbohydrate Diets and Glucagon Response in T1DM
Type1diabetesDespite major technological advances, management of type one diabetes mellitus (T1D) remains suboptimal, putting millions of people at risk for immediate and long-term complications. After meals, a mismatch between carbohydrate absorption rate and insulin action typically leads to alternating periods of hyper- and hypoglycemia. A conceptually promising approach to control both problems is dietary carbohydrate restriction to reduce postprandial blood glucose changes and insulin needs. In a prior survey study, the investigators documented exceptional glycemic control (HbA1c 5.67%) and low acute complication rates among 316 children and adults with T1D consuming a very-low-carbohydrate (VLC) diet. Despite these promising preliminary results, the use of VLC diets for T1D remain controversial, because of their restrictive nature and theoretical concerns regarding growth, ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia risks and efficiency of glucagon treatment for hypoglycemia. Glucagon is used as a rescue medication during severe hypoglycemia and increases blood glucose levels by mobilizing liver glycogen stores. If these stores are depleted during carbohydrate restriction, glucagon response may be inadequate and put individuals at risk for refractory hypoglycemia. A physiologic study has shown a blunted but still adequate response to glucagon in n=10 participants after following a VLCD for 1 week. Longer-term studies have not been done. To test the hypotheses that glucagon response remains adequate while following a VLC diet in the longer term, the investigators will conduct a glucagon challenge in participants who are assigned to the VLC arm of a randomized-controlled feeding study in 32 young adults with T1D who will receive a VLC vs a standard diet for 12 weeks. After an overnight fast, twelve participants in the VLC arm will receive IV insulin to lower blood glucose levels to 60 mg/dL, followed by a glucagon injection and monitoring of blood glucose levels and other metabolic fuels.
Safe Management of People With Type 1 Diabetes and EAting Disorders studY
Diabetes MellitusType 11 moreThere is currently no effective intervention for type 1 diabetes and eating disorders. The main objective of STEADY Stage 2 is to test the feasibility of the newly developed STEADY intervention. STEADY was co-designed by using Experience Based Co-Design methodology and other qualitative methods (focus groups, interviews). These findings informed the development of a T1DM cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) manual. The intervention will now be tested in a feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) in adults with type 1 diabetes and eating disorders and compared with usual clinical care. If STEADY is feasible, this may provide an effective intervention for this population. This study will take place at King's College London. Participants will remain in the study for 6 months, with a 12-month extended observation period. The study is expected to end in February 2023.
Accuracy of Dexcom G6® and FreeStyle Libre® Sensors in Standardized Hypoxemia Conditions
Type 1 Diabetes MellitusType 2 Diabetes MellitusThe major aim is to evaluate accuracy of 2 Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) : Dexcom G6® and FreeStyle Libre® in standardized hypoxemia conditions (artificial normobaric hypoxia). Our purpose is to demonstrate the good performance and calibration of these CGM sensors in hypoxemia conditions.
Study of the Impact of PROximity Support for Patients With Type 1 DIABetes Treated With an Insulin...
Diabetes MellitusType 1Amidst medical innovations, many Type 1 diabetes patients using advanced therapy show improved control but still suffer from diabetes-related distress. To tackle this, the investigators propose an "enhanced care" model involving healthcare providers and pharmacists. The study compares standard and enhanced care for Type 1 adults, focusing on the pharmacist's role. The main question it aims to answer is : In patients with type 1 diabetes treated with pump or closed-loop therapy, does the improved enhanced care versus conventional layout improve diabetes-related distress at 12 months? Participants will complete a monthly online questionnaire to assess their diabetes-related distress as well as their frequency of use of standard and enhanced care as well as the associated patient satisfaction.
The Effects of Fluoxetine and/or DHEA
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus(1) To determine how the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI), fluoxetine (Prozac), an antidepressant often used to treat depression, stimulates the participant's body's ability to defend against low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). (2) To learn how a hormone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), stimulates the participant's body's ability to defend itself from low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). DHEA is a hormone produced naturally in the human body. However, it can be manufactured and is sold as an over-the-counter dietary supplement. The dose the investigators are giving in this study is higher than the usual recommended dosage taken as a supplement for certain medical conditions. (3) To study combined effects of fluoxetine and DHEA during low blood glucose. In the present study, the investigators will measure the participant's body's responses to hypoglycemia when given fluoxetine or DHEA or fluoxetine and DHEA or a placebo (a pill with no fluoxetine or DHEA). Approximately 64 individuals with type 1 diabetes will take part in this study.
Efficacy of Closed-loop Insulin Therapy in Prepubertal Child in Free-life
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Prepubertal ChildrenThe study is a randomized trial preceded by a run-in period and followed by a non-randomized study extension. After 3 weeks of outpatient use of study pump (1 week) and study pump+CGM (2weeks) as run-in period, patient and parents will be admitted for 4-hour training to closed-loop (AP) mode. Following randomization (1:1), patient will be allocated to '24-hour' use of AP or 'dinner and overnight AP mode/day time pump and CGM use' for the next 18-week period. At 18-week visit, a study extension for a further 18-week period will be initiated. AP mode that will be prescribed to all patients will depend from an independent DSMB decision based upon study safety data collected after 6 and 12 weeks from the first 30 included patients. Visits will occur at week 27 (safety follow-up) and 36 (final visit).
Pregnancy Intervention With a Closed-Loop System (PICLS) Study
Type 1 Diabetes MellitusPregnancy in DiabetesIn pregnancies associated with diabetes, lowering glucose to the recommended targets to prevent adverse health outcomes often leads to significant hypoglycemia. Hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy, automated insulin delivery using an insulin pump getting feedback from a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), may improve outcomes. This exploratory, novel pilot feasibility randomized clinical trial will evaluate pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on HCL therapy or Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy (SAPT, non-communicating pump and CGM) from the 2nd trimester, throughout pregnancy, and 4-6 weeks post-partum. Comparisons will be made on safety (Specific Aim [SA] 1), indices of glycemic variability and fear of hypoglycemia (SA 2), and quality of life and device satisfaction (SA 3) between groups. Exploratory SA 4 will compare maternal and fetal outcomes between groups. Safety data will include episodes of severe hypoglycemia requiring 3rd party assistance, diabetic ketoacidosis, and skin reactions. Glycemic control will be measured by CGM time spent in glucose ranges (<63, 63-140, >140 mg/dL) and other measures of glycemic variability. Subjects will fill out surveys (Fear of Hypoglycemia, a quality of life survey, and 2 questionnaires about device satisfaction) at baseline, throughout gestation, and early post-partum. Data on maternal and fetal outcomes will be collected. Findings will reveal the safety profile and glucose control with a novel therapy for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.
Automated Insulin Delivery in Elderly With Type 1 Diabetes (AIDE T1D)
Type 1 Diabetes MellitusA multi-center, randomized, crossover trial consisting of three sequential 12-week periods, with the HCL feature used during one period, the PLGS feature used during one period and SAP therapy (control) during one period. The crossover trial will be preceded by a run-in phase in which participants will receive training using the study devices (Dexcom G6 and Tandem t:slim X2 pump). After the last crossover period, participants will be given the opportunity to use study devices for an additional 12 weeks to assess preference of system use (PLGS, HCL or SAP) and associated characteristics, durability and safety in a more real-world setting with less frequent study contact.
Diabetes Autoimmunity Withdrawn In New Onset and In Established Patients
Diabetes MellitusType 1The study is a prospective, randomized, 52-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in subjects with T1D followed by a 2-year safety follow-up.