Active clinical trials for "Diabetic Foot"

This research is being done to compare two different methods of wound monitoring for chronic wounds: remote wound monitoring using a smartphone app and in-person wound monitoring in a clinic setting. This will be a pilot non-blinded randomized controlled feasibility trial. The investigators will enroll 120 patients with an active diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) who present to the multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic in Baltimore, Maryland. Patients will be computer randomized 1:1 to receive wound care monitoring using remote DFU monitoring technology or standard in-person monitoring for 12 weeks.

Within their lifetime, over 30% of people living with diabetes will develop a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), many of which will never heal and may require amputation. Removable cast walkers (RCWs) are commonly prescribed to offload (treat) DFUs. While RCWs are prescribed to be worn during all weight bearing activities, adherence to this prescription is low. This is a serious concern given that low adherence predicts poor DFU healing. This study will provide pilot/feasibility data to inform a larger clinical trial to evaluate the impact of existing RCW designs on adherence and DFU healing. We will also quantify the effect of RCW form on biomechanical and self-reported measures related to usability. Our working hypothesis is that healing outcomes with a given RCW will be predicted by biomechanical and self-reported measures of RCW usability, with the predictive relationship partly explained by the effect of these measures on adherence.

This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate outcome after toe amputation due to diabetic foot infection. Aim of this RCT is to evaluate wound healing and functional outcome based, whether wound is closed or left open. As a part of this study, emerging technology of thermal imaging is evaluated as a possible tool to predict complication after amputation.

The goal of the clinical trial is to investigate adherence to, and effects of, the Bluedrop Monitoring System (BMS) in high-risk patients with at least one previous diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). The BMS is a remote thermovisual monitoring system, which allows the condition of the soles of the feet to be remotely monitored for thermal and visual signs of inflammation, both of which may signal the onset of certain conditions, such as diabetic foot ulcers. It is comprised of the Delta Foot Scanner (DFS) device and its accompanying Sentinel Review Interface (SRI) software. The Covid-19 pandemic has driven the need for remote patient care where possible. Although this is challenging for people with foot ulcers, prevention is the key. Remote thermovisual monitoring might help reduce recurrent foot ulcers and therefore the number of necessary hospital visits which always puts the patient at increased risk of Covid infection.

The primary aim of the study is to establish a diabetic foot school. The secondary aim is to compare the effects of the training given to diabetic foot patients within the scope of the diabetic foot school, on sensory, balance, lower extremity biomechanics and the effectiveness of these individuals on the knowledge level of diabetic foot. With the evaluations to be made, the effectiveness of the diabetic foot school program will be proven and it will contribute to the literature with objective and evidence-based results. For these reasons, the hypotheses on which the research is based were formed as follows; H11 hypothesis: The diabetic foot school program applied in diabetic foot patients has an effect on foot biomechanical measurements and gait parameters. Hypothesis H12: In diabetic foot patients, the diabetic foot school program has an effect on the sensation of individuals. H13 hypothesis: In diabetic foot patients, the diabetic foot school program has an effect on the balance of individuals. H14 hypothesis: In diabetic foot patients, the diabetic foot school program has an effect on the diabetic foot and self-care behaviors of individuals.

The purpose of this study is to understand the effects of the Bluedrop Monitoring System (BMS) on the development of diabetic foot ulcers. All Participants in this study will continue with their normal foot care and complete surveys with questions about their foot health every three months. Participants selected to receive the BMS will place it in their home and stand on it once a day for 12 months. Participants will also need to answer questions about their general foot health and, if using the system, their experience using the device and monitoring service.

This study aims to design, develop, and evaluate a smart insole to predict the formation of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in diabetic participants at risk of developing them. The study will be conducted in two phases, using mixed-method research and engaging both diabetic participants and NHS clinicians. In Phase 1, the user-centred design of the smart insole will be developed through focus groups and online questionnaires, and a preliminary safety evaluation of the insole will be conducted with healthy team members. In Phase 2, the insole will be tested, validated, and data will be collected through baseline visits, lab studies, and insole data collection with shape-changed (pressure off-loading) insoles. The study will be conducted by researchers from the University of Manchester and the University of Exeter. It will include 10 people with diabetes and 10 healthy controls in Phase 2.

During their lifetime, 15 to 25% of patients with diabetes mellitus will develop a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) related to neuropathy and/or peripheral arterial disease. DFU is the leading cause of non-traumatic lower-extremity amputation worldwide. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), which complicates up to 60% of DFU, is a major trigger of amputation in over 80% of persons with diabetes resulting in subsequent loss of quality of life. It has been shown that medical treatment of DFO may prevent amputations with early diagnosis of osteomyelitis and appropriate use of antibiotics. Empirical antimicrobial treatment is not recommended for DFO as for other chronic infections. Surgically or radiologically acquired bone sample for culture is the reference standard recommended by the International Working Group of Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) to diagnose DFO and to determine the causative bacteria and their susceptibility. However, defining appropriate antimicrobial therapy directed to the causative bacteria in DFO is challenging since it requires bone biopsy (BB) procedures which are underused in clinical practice for various reasons: lack of availability, cost, and delay. Some clinicians also find bone biopsy cumbersome or too invasive. To overcome these barriers, we have set up for a few years a bedside blind BB procedure performed by diabetologists at the bedside in the clinical ward. Since then, this method has been used in more than 200 patients with DFO in the diabetology departments of Lariboisiere Hospital and Bichat Hospital (Paris). We have recently published our observational data of 79 patients showing that bedside BB is a simple, safe and efficient procedure for the diagnosis of DFO with a similar rate of complete healing at 12 months compared to conventional surgical or radiological bone biopsies. In order to extend and confirm these preliminary and observational results, the aim of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety of bedside BB versus conventional bone biopsy in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of patients with DFO. Our hypothesis is that bedside BB is non-inferior to conventional bone biopsy in DFO and can be used as a simpler alternative procedure to document DFO

Diabetes is a serious and chronic disease that affects more than 347 million people in the world. It is the leading cause of death by age and its prevalence is increasing annually throughout the world. Diabetes is a disorder that manifests itself with elevated blood glucose levels that may be the resultof a deficiency in insulin secretion or action, or a combination of both problems. The "Diabetic foot" includes a number of syndromes in which the interaction of the loss of protective sensation by the presence of sensory neuropathy, the change in pressure points due to motor neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction and decreased Blood flow due to peripheral vascular disease can lead to the appearance of injuries or ulcers induced by minor traumas that go "unnoticed." This situation leads to significant morbidity and a high risk of amputation. It can be prevented with the application of prevention programs, based on the early detection of neuropathy, assessment of associated risk factors, along with the application of a structured program of education and treatment of risk factors. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: 1- Comparison of ulceration rates, decrease in amputation rates in the target population with intervention: LSCI, thermography and creation of personalized insoles versus the control group with assessment, treatment and follow-up, without the intervention of interest in the study. 2- Correlation between changes in perfusion and temperature detected in combination of LSCI and thermography to predict diabetic foot ulcers and the risk of having ulcers. Study Model: Parallel Assignment 1:1 . Patients with inclusion criteria and without exclusion criteria will be randomized into two groups with Randomization with sequence concealment, centralized in computer support. OxMaR (Oxford Minimization and Randomization) After signing the informed consent, the patients will be divided into two groups. Number of Arms 2 Masking: None (Open Label) A-GROUP WITH LSCI, 3D FOOT CREATOR FOLLOW UP B- GROUP WITHOUT LSCI, 3D FOOT CREATOR FOLLOW UP.

The primary aim of this study is to demonstrate the impact of the Orpyx® SI Sensory Insoles (Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc., Calgary AB, Canada) ("Orpyx" or "the Company") as an adjunct to the standard of care (SOC), as compared to SOC alone, on reducing plantar ulceration incidence in individuals who are at risk for developing diabetic foot complications. The secondary aims of this study are to evaluate participant quality of life, participant engagement, and economic impact, including cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. The study will also use the unique data set collected (plantar pressure, temperature, step count, movement and adherence feedback) to identify foot-loading histories that either lead to or prevent the development of ulceration in the diabetic foot.