Active clinical trials for "Mental Disorders"

From 1999 onwards, Deep Brain Stimulation [DBS] has been proposed as an alternative to capsulotomy in refractory cases of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder [OCD]. More recently, several studies with DBS in patients with major depression have been initiated. In Belgium, there is currently a reimbursement for devices for DBS for OCD, but not for rechargeable neurostimulators, in these OCD patients. Although rechargeable neurostimulators are widely used in spinal cord stimulation for pain and DBS for movement disorders, they have not yet been used in DBS for psychiatric disorders population. Several possible problems might arise with the use of rechargeable neurostimulators in this highly specific population. In this prospective study with a before-after design, we would like to determine if the use of rechargeable neurostimulators is effective, applicable and safe and capable of diminishing the need for neurostimulator replacement procedures.

The overarching purpose of this pilot study is to collect preliminary data regarding the variability of weight gain associated with lurasidone (Latuda©) treatment of antipsychotic naive children and adolescents in order to inform decisions about including a lurasidone arm in a future large scale trial of different approaches to minimize antipsychotic associated weight gain in the pediatric population. In adults, lurasidone appears to cause minimal weight gain. The participants will be 6-19 years old with psychotic spectrum, mood spectrum, or autism spectrum disorders. They will have 4 weeks or less of lifetime antipsychotic exposure.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of family cognitive adaptation training, including its impact on functioning and caregiver burden. Families that receive the manual will be compared with a control group of families that will not receive the manual. The larger goal is to add to the tools family members have access to better support their family members with schizophrenia.

Obesity occurs at 2-3 times the general population rate in persons living with a psychotic illness. The risk of obesity-related serious medical conditions like diabetes and heart disease are also two to three times higher in this population. Traditional behavioral weight management approaches help more than half of these individuals to lose weight, but a significant proportion are not helped. This pilot study is intended to determine the feasibility, efficacy, acceptability, and potential clinical utility of an intervention that integrates mindfulness, acceptance, distress tolerance, and motivation and commitment combined with traditional behavioral strategies for weight loss. This is the first study to investigate such an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss in psychotic illness. The results from this study will help to determine whether future research in this area is warranted with a larger sample, over a longer period of time. Primary hypothesis: Weight loss will be greater in individuals who receive the acceptance based behavioral intervention, relative to those who receive nutritional counseling.

This study will experimentally evaluate an internet-based version of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program, the Triple P Online System (TPOS), which presents the Triple P content in an interactive, video-enriched, and personalized format with 3-levels of flexible dosage, and will compare it against usual community services. Thirty pediatric clinics involving 100 practitioners in 9 counties across western Washington will be recruited and randomized to receive (a) access for their patients to the Triple P Online System and training in how to effectively promote TPOS and advise parents on their children's behavior problems or (b) Usual Care Community-Waitlist Control, in which parents will be assisted with an appropriate referral for services in the community.

The purpose of this study is to determine wether peer support is effective for the treatment of people with severe mental illness.

Efficacy of transitional case management following psychiatric hospital discharge: a randomized trial Background The movement of deinstitutionalisation in Western societies has modified the role of psychiatric hospital, which has lost its asylum function to become a place for acute care. Psychiatric stays are now shorter and close interactions with the outpatient care network is therefore more critical than before. The first weeks following discharge from psychiatric hospital represent a period of high risk for relapse, readmission or even suicide. Case management has a proven efficacy in facilitating patients' deinstitutionalisation after very long hospitalisations and in stabilizing high users of psychiatric care. In contrast, studies exploring the impact of time limited case management following discharge from short stays (transitional case management) in earlier phases of psychiatric disorders in connection with primary care are lacking. Working Hypotheses The investigators hypothesize that transitional case management following hospital discharge decreases risk of readmission, improves adherence to outpatient care, facilitates recovery and improves patients' satisfaction with treatment as compared to routine care. Specific Aims In this study, the investigators will compare the impact of both intervention on number of contact and level of adherence to outpatient care. The investigators will also compare both groups on number of readmission, risk of early aggravation of the disorders, level of functioning and satisfaction with care. Methods This is a randomized single-blind study comparing transitional case management after discharge with routine post-hospitalization care for subjects living independently without institutional psychiatric follow-up. Demographic and clinical data will be gathered during hospitalization, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. Quantitative assessment of outcomes using validated instruments will be: contact and level of adherence to outpatient care (primary outcomes), as well as number of hospitalization days, number of readmissions, severity of illness and satisfaction with care (secondary outcomes). Expected Value of the Proposed Project This study should improve psychiatric patients follow-up in collaboration with the different levels of care in the global context of deinstitutionalization.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a scientifically validated treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) called Prolonged Exposure (PE) can be delivered effectively to Veterans with Military Sexual Trauma (MST) related PTSD using videoconferencing technology, which allows a therapist and patient who are not in the same room as one another to communicate. The investigators are interested in learning if this form of mental health service delivery is an acceptable alternative to traditional face-to-face therapy delivered with the therapist in the same room as the patient. This study is being conducted at the Charleston VA Medical Center and surrounding Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs), and will involve approximately 100 female participants.

Tipepidine (3-[di-2-thienylmethylene]-1-methylpiperidine) has been used solely as a nonnarcotic antitussive in Japan since 1959. The safety of tipepidine in children and adults has already been established. It is reported that tipepidine inhibits G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK)-channel currents. The inhibition of GIRK channels by tipepidine is expected to modulate the level of monoamines in the brain. We put forward the hypothesis that tipepidine can improve attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms by modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission through the inhibition of GIRK channels. The purpose of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is to confirm whether treatment with tipepidine can improve symptoms in pediatric patients with ADHD.

The selection of antipsychotic in early stages of the illness is mainly determined by its clinical effectiveness. Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are the first line drug treatment for individuals suffering from schizophrenia. It is clear that SGAs are not a homogeneous group and clinical effects and profile of side effects differ between SGAs. Differences among antipsychotics in terms of effectiveness have turned out to be a topic of increasing research interest, although comparisons between the different SGAs are scarce. In first episode of psychosis, SGAs have shown a higher treatment effectiveness compared to first generation antipsychotics (FGAs) (findings primarily driven by Haloperidol). Less evident seems to be the notion that some of the SGAs might be more effective (in terms of treatment discontinuation) than others. Most of the medium-term randomized studies have shown similar rates of all-cause treatment discontinuation in first episode patients treated with different SGAs. It may be concluded that more randomized controlled trails should be accomplished to determine the position of frequently used SGAs in clinical practice. The investigators undertook this study with the major objective of comparing the clinical effectiveness of three widely utilized SGAs (Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone and Quetiapine) in the acute treatment of first-episode non-affective psychosis individuals.