Active clinical trials for "Substance-Related Disorders"

Chronic pain is associated with psychological disorders; which may affect a patient's socioeconomic, legal, domestic, and employment situations. This prospective observational study evaluates the impact of pain management on patients' health, social, economic, and employment status. It explores the impact of pain clinic services on patients' mental health, family health, public health, road safety, addiction situation, public safety, injury rehabilitation and employment situation.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of the Breaking the Cycle (BTC) and Maxxine Wright (MW) programs in substance-involved mothers and their children. One key difference between the two programs is that the BTC program contains an infant mental health component while the MW program primarily focuses on the mothers. The main questions the trial aims to answer are: Do children at BTC demonstrate enhanced infant mental health compared to children at MW up to 2 years post-intervention? Do mother-child dyads at BTC experience more decreases in child adverse childhood experiences (ACE), maternal stress, and mental health symptoms and have better home environment scores, parenting attitudes, and mother-child relationship scores compared to mother-child dyads at MW? Are enhanced infant mental health outcomes associated with children's lower psychosocial risk scores and mothers with lower ACE scores, lower depression and anxiety scores, and lower maternal stress? Are the associations between treatment dose and infant mental health scores mediated by parenting attitudes and the mother-child relationship? Does child exposure to psychosocial risk moderate the association between treatment dose and child outcomes? How do the mechanisms of change lead to the effectiveness of BTC? What are the potential lifetime health and non-health outcomes of at-risk children at BTC? What is the long-term social return on investment (SROI) of BTC? Participants will complete several questionnaires at three timepoints while receiving services at either BTC or MW: during the intake phase, 12 months after their engagement in services and 24 months after their engagement in services. Given that the two programs serve a similar demographic of women, researchers will compare the BTC group and the MW group to establish the comparative effectiveness and mechanisms of change of the infant mental health component of BTC.

Individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) have to cope with drug-related cues and contexts, which can affect instrumental drug seeking as shown with Pavlovian to instrumental transfer (PIT) paradigms in animals and humans. The investigators aimed to investigate the impact of acute and chronic stress on Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT), how PIT it is associated with cognitive control abilities and whether such effects predict losing vs. regaining control in subjects with AUD. Moreover, the investigators aimed to develop a novel full transfer task that assesses both, general and specific PIT to investigate whether specific PIT differs between alcohol use disorder (AUD) and control subjects.

Harmful alcohol use is a global risk factor for disease, injuries and death. Research on treatment of Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) indicates that different treatment modalities are equally effective, but also that a large group of patients do not change their drinking pattern despite being in treatment. It is assumed that it is not random who benefits from treatment. Thirty to forty percent of outcome variance in treatment is probably explained by patient factors, and we need more knowledge on how different patient factors moderate treatment effects. Further, clinicians also need more knowledge about selecting patients to different therapies. The present study will investigate how patient factors predict outcome in group treatment of AUDs, and what predicts positive treatment outcomes over time. The study is designed as a quasi-experimental, multi-centre, follow-up study. Patients will be included from Vestfold Hospital Trust, Borgestadklinikken, Blue Cross Clinic, Behandlingssenteret Eina, Blue Cross Clinic and A-senteret, Oslo, Church City Mission. The Project will provide more knowledge about patients seeking treatment for AUDs, and specifically how patient factors predict outcome in group treatment. These results will in turn lead to better selection of treatment modalities, and patients will receive a more effective treatment earlier on. Main aims: 1) How do patient factors predict outcome in group treatment of alcohol use disorders (AUDs)? 2) Do positive treatment outcomes last over time? Specifically, do the following factors: a) psychiatric comorbidity b) severity of alcohol use pre-treatment c) personality disorders and d) cognitive impairments predict 1) completion of group treatment and 2) positive outcome after 1 year. As an additional aim, we will investigate if the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCa) is feasible as a brief screening instrument for mild cognitive impairments for AUD patients.

Music Therapy (MT) has been shown to improve several symptoms experienced by people with Substance Use Disorder (SUD), such as depressive and anxiety symptoms, as well as negative emotions. Particularly, a recent Cochrane review reported craving reduction as a main outcome for MT delivered to SUD participants. The possible mechanism(s) of therapeutic change is yet to be identified and future randomized control trials applying neuroscience research methods may help doing so. However, there is a significant lack of studies investigating those effects in a specific cohort of out-patients on prescription medicine from Community Substance Misuse Treatment Services (CSMTS). This research project aims to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of MT and the applied test battery in CSMTS for a future Randomised Controlled Trails (RCT). Fifteen participants from a CSMTS will take part in a three-arm randomized non-blind controlled trial. 5 participants will receive 6 weekly individual music therapy sessions (IMT), 5 participants will receive 6 weekly group music therapy (GMT) sessions and 5 participants will act as a control group (CG) receiving treatment as usual (TAU). IMT and GMT participants will continue to receive TAU by the CSMTS. The CG will have the opportunity to receive MT as well, after the end of the study. Regarding the feasibility of the service implementation, the investigators will evaluate participant satisfaction and implement a focus group following the final session to collect feedback and evaluation on acceptability of the intervention from both participants and staff. Moreover, retention in treatment and completion rates will be measured after the end of the MT sessions. Furthermore, based on previous research and the theoretical basis of MT interventions, the investigators aim to explore the effects of MT on craving, substance use, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and inhibitory control in people with SUD. Changes in the brain correlates of the abovementioned symptoms will be investigated as well as how music and emotion are processed in the brain during MT. The investigators will collect subjective and objective baseline measurements and compare them against post-treatment measurements. Some variables of interest will be measured by Electroencephalography (EEG) which is a non-invasive technique to record electrical brain activity. The study will take place in a Westminster Drug Project provided community-based integrated adult substance misuse service in London. Participants will be recruited from service users receiving treatment at this service.

THIS STUDY DOES NOT OFFER ANY FORM OF TREATMENT FOR PTSD, PAIN OR SUBSTANCE DEPENDENCE. In populations with substance use disorders (SUD), there is a high prevalence of chronic pain with various underlying causes. Chronic pain can complicate the treatment of SUD and lead to poorer treatment outcomes. There is a need for a better understanding of the connections and interactions between chronic pain and substance use and dependence. Further, there is a high prevalence of chronic pain among patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As there is an overlap between populations with SUD and PTSD, taking potentially traumatizing life-experiences and post-traumatic stress symptoms into account can provide a better understanding of chronic pain in populations with SUD. The Nor-APT study is a cross-sectional study, where the goal is to recruit 1 500 patients from outpatient and inpatient substance use treatment centres connected to Akershus University Hospital and Oslo University Hospital in Norway. Participants are invited to complete a questionnaire about substance/medication use, pain and how pain affect function, stressful life events and post-traumatic stress symptoms. The questionnaire has been developed in collaboration with clinicians at the various substance dependence treatment units and the Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS). The purpose of the Nor-APT study is to contribute to a better understanding and treatment of chronic pain among people with substance use disorders (SUD), and to contribute to the understanding of co-occurring substance use, chronic pain and post-traumatic stress symptoms. The four over-arching research aims are to: I. Describe the prevalence and characteristics of pain for people in need of treatment for substance/medication use/dependence. II. Describe how the pain affects physical and emotional functioning, and subjective quality of life. III. Explore any connections between substance/medication use and pain, both what came first and any ways substance/medication use and pain affect each other. IV. Explore the connection between chronic pain, potentially traumatizing life events and post-traumatic stress symptoms. In addition, the investigators will explore whether participants' experiences can be categorized into typical trajectories for how substance use, chronic pain and stressful life events occur and develop over the life span.

This study is a multi-site, cluster randomized, two group implementation trial comparing a low- versus high-intensity implementation strategy for supporting hospital-based opioid use disorder treatment (HBOT) in community hospital settings where medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment has not been implemented.

Background: People with addictions often find it hard to choose the long-term benefits of abstinence over the short-term effects of using drugs. Researchers think this is partly due to parts of the brain involved in certain types of learning and decision-making. Researchers want to test these basic functions using a simple task with pictures and odors. Objective: To see if performance in a learning task differs between people who have opioid-use disorder and people who don t. Eligibility: Adults 21-60 years old who are willing to fast for at least 6 hours and smell food odors. Those with an opioid-use disorder must either not use for at least 3 weeks or be in treatment. Design: Participants will have 1 visit that will take up to 5 hours. Before the visit, participants will be asked to not eat or drink anything except water for at least 6 hours. At the visit, participants will be checked for signs of intoxication. Participants will give urine and breath samples. Participants will have tests of learning and behavior. They will look at shapes on a computer screen. The shapes will be paired with different food odors. The odors will come from a sterile tube placed under the nose. Participants will have their breathing monitored with a belt around the upper abdomen. About 30 days and 60 days later, participants will be called and asked about their drug use over the past 30 days.

The Subthreshold Opioid Use Disorder Prevention (STOP) trial will test the efficacy of a primary care intervention to reduce opioid use and overdose risk, and prevent progression to OUD, in adults with unhealthy use of illicit or prescribed opioids. STOP is a collaborative care model. A cluster-randomized trial, conducted in 5 primary care sites, with 100 PCPs and 300adult primary care patients, will test the efficacy of STOP versus enhanced usual care (EUC). The STOP intervention, if proven efficacious, will provide a solution to preventing OUD among patients who are most at risk, thus addressing a key aspect of the current opioid crisis.

The purpose of this research study is to compare two ways of managing pain in people who are taking buprenorphine and are scheduled to undergo surgery. Buprenorphine (subutex) and buprenorphine/naloxone (suboxone) are effective long-term treatments for substance use disorders. The management of pain after surgery in adults taking buprenorphine can be challenging, as buprenorphine may interfere with the effectiveness of other medications used to treat pain. We want to compare how well pain is managed after surgery ("post-op") in two groups: The "Continue Group": those who continue taking their standard dose of buprenorphine before, during and after surgery. The "Reduce Group": those who are placed on a lower dose of buprenorphine starting one day before surgery and during the time period after surgery until the pain from the surgery has decreased. Once the pain from the surgery has decreased, you will be put back on your full dose of buprenorphine. We also want to find out if there is a difference in pain, opioid cravings, and relapse rates in the month following surgery.