Active clinical trials for "Epilepsy"

This is a post-market medical device study. This study will compare best medical practice with or without adjunctive VNS Therapy in patients who are 16 years and older with pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy.

This study is intended to investigate the safety and efficacy of a novel formulation of oxcarbazepine that is released more slowly than the current formulation. The study medication will be used as a treatment against partial epilepsy.

This study is intended to provide evidence that zonisamide is safe and effective in the treatment of myoclonic seizures. The total planned trial duration will be 6.5 months. After that, subjects who have completed the study will be eligible to enroll in an open-label extension study until zonisamide is marketed for this indication or further development in this indication stops. This extension study will be described in a separate protocol (E2090-E044-318).

The purpose of this research study is to compare the long term effectiveness, safety and tolerability of carisbamate compared to two other frequently prescribed anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy.

Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) are the main treatment for epilepsy; however, only a limited number of AEDs are approved for use as monotherapy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BRV in the conversion of partial onset seizure patients from combination treatment to monotherapy.

The primary goal is to determine whether hippocampal electrical stimulation (HS) is safe and more effective than simply implanting an electrode in the hippocampus without electrical stimulation (HI), in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). This will be assessed by the rate of complex partial seizures per person-month over 6 months of follow-up in HS vs. HI. There are two treatment arms: 1) Hippocampal Electrode Implantation with Stimulation (HS). 2) Hippocampal Electrode Implantation without stimulation (HI). The investigators expect to demonstrate that HS is safe and superior to HI in controlling seizures in patients with MTLE.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of deep brain stimulation in drug resistant epilepsy. This is a double blind, controlled and randomized clinical trial with two cross-over groups and four phases. Phase 1 : base line, open phase consisting of follow-up of patients with their standard treatment. Phase 2 : Randomisation, lead implantation, followed by 3 months wash out period with the stimulator switch OFF. Phase 3 : cross-over, double blind phase : 3 months with stimulator switch ON or OFF depending on randomization allocation, followed by 3 months with the stimulator switch on the opposite position. The placebo consisting of turn OFF the stimulator. Phase 4 : open phase, one year follow-up of all patients with the stimulator switch ON.

This project is a multicenter prospective study. By retrieving outpatient medical records and collecting clinical data of epilepsy patients, the efficacy and safety of single-drug perampanel in patients with focal epilepsy were analyzed.

The purpose of this study is to examine the long-term safety and tolerability of USL261 in the treatment of seizure clusters.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of different intravenous doses (IV) of a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) called lacosamide on continuous EEG (electroencephalogram) rhythms (or brain rhythms) in subjects with focal seizures and the tolerability of those doses by patients. In addition, this study will assess the effect of IV lacosamide on EKG (electrocardiogram), a test which checks for problems with the electrical activity of the heart.