Active clinical trials for "Kidney Failure, Chronic"

Prospective multicenter randomized cross-over study Number of patients : 32 (8 patients per group) Obtain objectives data to advise each hemodialyzer according to dialysis treatment and patient profile. To evaluate the different hemodialyzers and judge their extraction performances in HD and post HDF. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of the hemodialyzers and the patients' inflammatory status.

This study will investigate the administration of Triferic AVNU intravenously by three different administration schedules compared to continuous infusion over 3 hours

This observational study will evaluate bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measurements from patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Dialysis treatment non-adherence is a prevalent problem among the end-stage renal population receiving chronic hemodialysis. The complications associated with missed or shortened dialysis sessions are serious and frequently require emergent medical care or hospitalization. Previous studies have shown that electronic messages have significantly improved attendance rates in a primary care setting, but these messages have not been validated in the chronic dialysis population. An electronic intervention has been developed by Epharmix, a WUSTL IDEA Labs (ideas.wustl.edu) team, which has the capacity to use automated SMS text messages and/or phone calls to notify patients prior to each upcoming appointment, as well as alert a designated patient advocate. Patients receiving the messages are provided with key contact information for a dialysis rescheduling phone line, transportation resources, social work services, etc. They may also receive instructions on what to do if they are experiencing physical symptoms and need educational facts about dialysis. In particular, the intervention is designed to demonstrate to patients that the center cares and is concerned for their health and wellbeing. This intervention may potentially improve patient adherence to their scheduled sessions, increase patient satisfaction with their treatment, and prevent medical complications associated with missed dialysis appointments. This study aims to determine whether an electronic intervention, which sends SMS text messages or phone calls of key dialysis treatment information, is able to improve dialysis treatment session attendance among dialysis patients with a history of poor attendance. We secondarily aim to identify the factors that may be barriers to dialysis treatment session attendance and the emergency department or hospital utilization associated with missed dialysis treatments. Patients will be prospectively identified, recruited, and randomized into two groups. Group A will receive the electronic intervention prior to their appointments; Group B will not receive any electronic intervention. After 8 weeks, crossover will occur for both groups and the study will continue for an additional 8 weeks. Participants' clinic records will be reviewed to determine the numbers of missed and attended appointments, as well as records of ED visits and hospital admissions. Subjects will be asked to complete a post-study satisfaction questionnaire.

This is a pilot, single-center, randomized trial of 90 subjects to evaluate complication rates and functional status decline in subjects age 65 years and older referred for vascular access placement. Subjects will be randomized to arteriovenous fistula (AVF) (n = 45) versus arteriovenous graft (AVG) (n = 45), placed in a vascular access monitoring protocol, and undergo measurements of functional status including gait speed, grip strength, and self-reported function over 6 months. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that AVF placement will result in a higher proportion of primary access failure as defined by a binary composite primary endpoint of an unsalvageable access or an immature access or a non-functional access measured at 6 months compared to AVG placement. In addition, the study will evaluate whether AVF placement and a greater number of access procedures will result in a greater decline in functional status as measured by the average change over 6 months in gait speed, grip strength, and self-reported function as assessed by the Disabilities in Arm, Shoulder and Hand Survey.

This study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center evaluation of the performance of the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft. The study will enroll patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), who are either currently receiving or expected to require hemodialysis through a prosthetic vascular graft within 30 days. Gore proposes to demonstrate that the 6 month cumulative patency of the GORE® ACUSEAL Vascular Graft is similar to that of other arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). > >> > >> A total of 138 Subjects will be enrolled. Once the study procedure has been successfully completed, cannulation may occur at any time at the Investigator's discretion. > >> > >> Subjects will be selected from up to 20 Investigational Sites.

During hemodialysis treatments, patients receive heparin to prevent clotting. The purpose of this pilot study is to determine if the amount of heparin administered during a patient's hemodialysis can be individualized using an equation for heparin dose adjustment.

The proposed controlled, randomized study aims to compare pre-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) and low flux hemodialysis (HD) regarding acute changes in the brain. The study consist of two examination days placed one week apart. 12 HD patients will be recruited to the study. The patients will be randomly placed in two groups: Pre-dilution hemodiafiltration during the first examination and low flux hemodialysis during the second day or vice versa. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) will be obtained before and after both treatments. The MRI-data will later be processed to estimate brain volume changes during the two types of treatment.

The purpose of this study is to compare the hemoglobin and hematocrit variability between once and three times weekly erythropoietin therapy for the anemia in patients with maintenance dialysis.

The purpose of this study is to offer Panel Reactive Antibodies [PRA] reduction treatment to high responder renal transplant patients who otherwise may never be compatible with a potential organ donor. PRA reduction is offered in the following phases: Immunological Testing Transplant Nephrectomy Pharmacologic Therapy Plasmapheresis Transplant