Active clinical trials for "Diabetic Foot"

A Prospective, Double-blind, Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel-group safety and efficacy study of adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) in the treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU).

The geko™ Cross Therapy REGISTRY - Wound is a prospective, observational, anonymised data collection Registry with no experimental treatment that will fulfil an unmet need for an observational Registry to provide long-term clinical data to demonstrate patient benefit and regulatory compliance.

Yunnan Baiyao has been treating all kinds of wounds for 120 years, but the evidence of Evidence-based medicine that is truly convincing is insufficient, making its best application method unclear. This study explored the possible indications and use methods of Yunnan Baiyao in different stages of Diabetic foot, and obtained Evidence-based medicine evidence of clinical efficacy. Obtain the discarded tissues of Diabetic foot patients in the treatment and control groups of Yunnan Baiyao after wound debridement, conduct Transcriptome (BulkRNA seq) analysis and detection on the wound tissues, and analyze the related signal pathways and functional genes with significant differences, to help clarify the possible treatment targets of Yunnan Baiyao.

Intervention in the form of a PA (physical activity) program combining aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises adapted for wearing a lower limb offloading device and limiting weight-bearing on the feet, with a duration of twelve (12) weeks, consisting of two supervised sessions and one unsupervised home session per week.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare safety and performance of the study device to the current typical NHS standards of care device. The main outcomes it aims to achieve are: Complete wound healing at 12 weeks (100% epithelialised) % Reduction in wound area at 12 weeks Participants will attend their NHS podiatry clinic appointment as normal and will be assigned either the study device or the current typical NHS standard of care device. Researchers will compare the study device group to the standard group to assess the outcomes mentioned previously.

Despite conflicting and contradictory evidence regarding its efficacy, some wound care centres have advocated and adopted ozone for treating DFU. However, there are gaps in the application of topical ozone therapy. Reported no significant impact on the healing process of DFU, and not all said that topical ozone can enhance the healing process. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of topical ozone therapy in conjunction with standard wound care versus routine wound care alone in treating DFU. The wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIFI) scale was used to measure wound size, the tissue survival rate at DFU, infection, peripheral microcirculation, glycemic control, Hba1c control, and wound healing.

The goal of this randomized control trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of Platelet Rich Plasma VS Platelet Fibrin Plasma in patients with diabetes foot ulcer. The main question it aims to answer are: Whether the Platelet Fibrin Plasma have noninferior efficacy than Platelet Rich Plasma in treatment of diabetes foot ulcer？ Whether the Platelet Fibrin Plasma have noninferior safety than Platelet Rich Plasma in treatment of diabetes foot ulcer？ Participants will be assigned with a 1:1 ratio into intervention group and control group. Participants of intervention group will receive Platelet Fibrin Plasma in addition with clinical optimal treatment plan after the wound bed preparation for closure. Participants of intervention group will receive Platelet Rich Plasma in addition with clinical optimal treatment plan after the wound bed preparation for closure.

The rise in diabetes incidence has led to a corresponding increase in diabetes-related complications. Diabetic foot ulcers, a severe consequence of diabetes, have substantial impacts on patients, the social environment, overall well-being, and nursing procedures. Given this context, there is a clear necessity for interventions that motivate patients to adopt beneficial health behaviors and educate them in effectively managing diabetes-related complications. This study seeks to investigate the impact of Watson's motivational interviewing method, which is grounded in the human care theory, on enhancing treatment adherence, self-efficacy, and satisfaction levels among individuals suffering from diabetic foot ulcers. Hypotheses of The Research H0: There is no difference in self-efficacy for diabetic foot care, diabetic foot care behavior, treatment adherence, and satisfaction between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education, and those who receive standard education. H1: There is a difference in self-efficacy for diabetic foot care between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education. H2: There is a difference in diabetic foot care behavior between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education. H3: There is a difference in treatment adherence between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education. H4: There is a difference in satisfaction between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

This will be a prospective, open-label, two-center study to assess the safety of omadacycline use in the treatment of hospitalized subjects with moderate to severe DFI with or without Acute osteomyelitis (AOM) who are at a high risk for development of CDI, AKI, and/or resistant pathogens compared to retrospective controls. Prospective enrollment will be continued until the sample size is achieved up to one year from start date (October 2020). Secondary to slower than anticipated enrollment due to the COVID-19 pandemic and initial exclusion of AOM, following protocol amendment, patient enrollment will be continued until the sample size is achieved up to 18 months from amendment approval (anticipate April 2022 - October 2023). A historical matched case cohort (standard of care) at the two hospitals based on ICD10 codes associated with DFI [E11.(621, 622), E10.(621, 622); L97.(509, 521, 522, 523, 524, 529)], including subjects with AOM [M86.(08-09, 10, 16-19, 8X0, 8X7-8X9, 9) will be utilized for comparison.

The goal of this observational study is to create and evaluate and new management, by using eHealth tools, to prevent diabetic foot ulcers. The main questions it aims to answer are: Validation a. Is a method for foot assessment, that uses eHealth tools, valid regarding its usefulness? b. Is a method for foot assessment, that uses eHealth tools, reliable regarding the generated risk stratification? Mapping How do health care professionals and patients with diabetes experience that the future foot examination should be designed? What experiences have health care professionals and patients with diabetes to use an eHealth tool supporting the annual foot examination? Interviews - to use a paper format supporting a structured foot assessment a. How do health care professionals experience to use a structured foot form, in paper form? Interviews - footwear a. What factors that influence how patients with diabetes choose their footwear? Interviews - usability test of using an eHealth tool a. How could a digital eHealth tool be designed? b. How could a digital eHealth solution be implemented, managed and spread in public health care setting? i. Participants will: 1. fill in questionnaires 2. be interviewed 3. test eHealth solutions supporting the foot examination 6. Experiences of using an eHealth tool supporting the foot assessment a. How could a digital eHealth tool be designed? 7. Questionnaires regarding self-perceived quality of life, the experiences of the visit at the care unit, transportation to the care unit. a. Patients that visits care fills in a questionnaire regarding self-perceived quality of life (EQ-5D), a modified version of National Patient Survey, the diabetes questionnaire and a questionnaire regarding their travels and time for travels to and from the visit to the care unit. 8. Critical evaluation of complexity Exists complexity in the development, test, management, spread and sustain of an eHealth tool supporting foot examination and self-care of the feet in diabetes. How could a digital eHealth solution be implemented, managed and spread in public health care setting? 9. Long term effect a. What is the long-term effect of using an eHealth tools supporting a structured foot examination?