Active clinical trials for "Gallstones"

A prospective randomized study was performed including consecutive patients who underwent an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic cholelithiasis during the 18 months period. This prospective randomized trial aims to compare two umbilical closure techniques for trocar site hernia (TSH) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Bile leak reduction from the common bile duct, as a result of glue appliance after cholangiotomy.

Objective:To explore the role of the right portal pedicle and Rouviere's sulcus as an anatomic landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods:The investigators are going to select 60 patients intending to perform Laparoscopic cholecystectomy from April 2014 to April 2015.Check out the presence of the right portal pedicle and Rouviere's sulcus during the surgery and divide into the experimental group and the control group.Experimental group operated in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the guide of Rouviere's sulcus while the Control group operated with the traditional way. Research hypothesis:Compare the differences between the Experimental group and the Control group in bile duct injury rate,complication rate,blood loss,operative time ,conversion rate and hospital stay.It is supposed that the results of Experimental group are superior to the control group,difference is statistically significant(P<0.05). So the investigators can draw the conclusion that the anatomy method with the guide of right portal pedicle and Rouviere's sulcus is useful in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Patients with gallstone disease should be checked whether a common bile duct (CBD) stone could be present. In case of a certain suspicion for CBD stones further investigations should be performed. This can either be done by magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreaticography (MRCP) or by intraoperative cholangiography. The study investigates which pathway would be favorable in regard of an early hospital demission.

Investigate serial plasma samples of fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) after oral stimulation with chenodeoxycholic acid in the same subjects before and after elective cholecystectomy

This study evaluates the clinical application of cholangiojejunostomy in the surgical treatment of cholelithiasis with Moderate dilatation of common bile duct. Half of participants will receive hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy and T-tube Drainage, while the other half will receive hepatectomy and T-tube Drainage.

The aim of this study is to assess possible differences between the LESS approach and the standard laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy. In particular, the Postoperative Quality of Life (QoL) will be investigated by analyzing the followings: length of hospital stay (LoS), postoperative pain, cosmetics and the results of SF 36 questionnaire. Furthermore, operative time, conversion to standard LC rate, difficulty of exposure, difficulty of dissection, and complication rate will be compared.

Surgeons usually choosing drainage tube for laparoscopic cholecystectomy according to their experiences but not guidelines. The investigators design a RCT to evaluate the role of drainage in LC surgery and compare the clinical results between drainage and no drainage.

Choledocholithiasis is identified in approximately 3-10 % of patients with cholelithiasis. (1-3) While laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the treatment of choice in patients with gall bladder stones, there is a debate about the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, (4) and this has led to a range of therapeutic strategies for the management of concomitant gallstones and CBD stones patients. Two-stage endoscopic management using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common approach, although single-stage management by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with surgical exploration of the CBD is an alternative, with the single-stage approach more common in the open surgery era. Currently, it is unclear whether two-stage management is better than or at least equivalent to the single-stage surgical approach to choledocholithiasis. To address this, we undertook this study to compare these two approaches. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to determine the best technique for the management of patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones, by comparing the success rate, complication rates, and longer-term follow-up outcomes.

Although EPBD has a lower risk of post-ERCP bleeding and long-term complications than EST and is easier to perform in altered/difficult anatomy, EPBD is reserved for patients with bleeding diathesis by current consensus because some studies reported a higher risk of pancreatitis. However, recent meta-analyses indicate that short EPBD duration increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and EPBD with adequate duration has a similar pancreatitis risk and a lower overall complication rate compared with EST for choledocholithiasis. Therefore, this study aim to compare long-duration EPBD vs EST in the treatment of extrahepatic biliary stones.