Active clinical trials for "Gingival Recession"

Following tooth loss, a considerable reduction in hard- and soft-tissue volume can be expected (Tan WL, et al., 2012), (AraujoMG, et al., 2015). In the anterior maxilla, tissue loss can make future implant restorations more challenging and less predictable in terms of achieving and maintaining favorable soft-tissue-emergence profiles. Even with careful implant planning and placement, marginal gingival recession of 0.5-1 mm has been a common finding with single-tooth implants (Nisapakultorn K, et al., 2010), (Suphanantachat S, et al., 2012). This is partly attributed to bone remodeling after implant surgery, and occurs regardless of implant-placement protocol used (Hof M, et al., 2015).

The aim of the present study is to compare two different multidisciplinary protocols using two types of grafts, porcine acellular dermal matrix (Mucoderm®) versus connective tissue graft, both associated with modified coronally advanced flap, in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesion partially (NCCL) restored by composite resin.

There are some orthodontics treatments that perform risk movements ,and a bone dehiscence may be expected. In that cases mucogingival surgery , such as connective tissue grafts, is necessary prior to tooth movement. The connective tissue graft in combination with coronal advanced flap is still considered the gold standard , although the use of porcine collagen matrix has obtained promising results for treatment of Miller class I and II recession defects. Most of the studies report clinical results after a connective tissue graft and there is no evidence about the type of attachment obtained after the graft is performed, a few articles have shown histological results. But, as a rule , a histological study is only performed under exceptional circumstances such as a dental fracture, untreatable decay, tooth extraction for orthodontic reasons, or other reasons. Most of the techniques results in the formation of a long junctional epithelium and connective tissue attachment with fibers parallel to the root surface. Animals studies have shown a shorter epithelium and a larger new cementum formation after the use of the collagen matrix.

34 patients with Miller class III will be included in this study, where 17 participants will be treated with connective tissue graft with coronally advanced flap (control group) and 17 participants will be treated with a papillary extended connective tissue graft with coronally advanced flap (test group) and followed up for 6 months.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the percentage of root coverage in Miller class I and II gingival recessions using connective tissue graft and collagen matrix with a two years follow-up.

Background: The aim of present clinical study was to evaluate the predictive values of baseline inter-dental papilla height (IPH), avascular exposed root surface area (AERSA) and inter-dental clinical attachment loss (CAL) measurements on complete root coverage (CRC) of single gingival recession (GR) defects treated with coronally advanced flap and connective tissue graft technique (CAF+CTG). Material and Methods: The study group included 65 females and 57 males, aged between 20 and 42 years. A total of 122 recession defects without CAL and with an amount of CAL equal or smaller to the buccal CAL , located at upper and lower incisors and canines were treated with CAF+CTG. IPH, AERSA and CAL parameters were analyzed for possible correlation with CRC after 6 months.

A single center, prospective clinical trial is planned to investigate the effect of different emergence angles of implant restorations on peri-implant soft tissue recession and implant marginal bone loss. The primary outcome is to systematically evaluate the association of implant-, peri-implant tissue-, and restoration-related factors with facial mucosal level changes.

Aesthetics for individuals become increasingly important, while the aesthetic effects of periodontal disease is an important issue that should be assessed by the patient's perception. The results demonstrate that the periodontal aesthetic perception scale showed reliable and valid scores in healthy controls and periodontal patients. The periodontal aesthetic perception scale may be an appropriate tool to assess periodontal esthetic in clinical and research settings.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of gingival fissures according to the type of brush used, soft and medium.

The goal of this observational prospective study is to objectively assess the dimensional (volume & linear variance) and clinical changes of vestibular gingival soft tissues upon treatment with laser-aided pouch roll augmentation technique and implant placement over a 12-month follow-up. Twelve patients with 16 mild horizontal ridge deficiencies in different edentulous sites scheduled for implant placement were enrolled. Digital impressions were taken with an intra-oral laser scanner and software and analyzed before (day 0) and 12 months after laser-aided pouch roll augmentation surgery. The digital files were converted to STL format and superimposed to assess peri-implant volumetric and linear dimensional variations in selected regions of interest (ROI) by a 3D analysis software. Operator-assessed clinical periodontal parameters (probing depth PD, bleeding on probing BoP, plaque index PI) were recorded. Patient-reported outcome (pain, discomfort, treatment liking) and aesthetic result were evaluated by administration of appropriate questionnaires.