Aqueous Humor Dynamic Components That Determine Intraocular Pressure Variance
GlaucomaOHT - Ocular HypertensionGlaucoma is a major cause of blindness. The inability to predict a patient's IOP response to medications is a critical barrier for the clinician to consistently provide highly effective IOP-based treatments. Current trial-and-error approaches to glaucoma management are inefficient and have not addressed this barrier as there are no predictive factors for drug response. Our long-term goal is to improve outcomes by identifying biomarkers and environmental factors that profile a patient at risk for glaucoma by age-of-onset, rate of disease progression, "poor response" to treatment, and large IOP fluctuation. Our purpose of this research project is to address this critical barrier by focusing on physiological factors that predict IOP response to drugs.
Endothelial Cell Loss in Pseudophakic Patients Receiving a Paul Glaucoma Drainage Device With Its...
GlaucomaRationale: Glaucoma is a group of diseases characterized by progressive neuropathy of the optic nerve associated with visual field loss. Current glaucoma management aims to preserve visual function throughout life by reducing the intraocular pressure. This can be achieved by medical therapy or by surgical procedures such as implantation of a glaucoma drainage device (GDD). Conventionally, the tube of such a device is positioned in the anterior chamber (AC). Unfortunately, the presence of the tube in the AC may have a significant negative impact on the number of endothelial cells of the cornea and may even lead to corneal decompensation. Alternatively, the tube can be positioned in the posterior chamber (i.e. behind the iris). In this study, both procedures will be compared. Objective: Primary: to determine the loss of corneal endothelial cells after implantation of a Paul GDD with its tube either anterior or posterior of the iris. Secondary: to compare efficacy and safety of both procedures. Study design: Prospective, randomised, treatment controlled clinical trial. Study population: Pseudophakic patients with glaucoma who need a GDD. Intervention: Implantation of a Paul GDD with its tube anterior/posterior of the iris. Main study parameters/endpoints: Endothelial cell loss of the cornea. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: At present potential benefits and drawbacks of positioning the Paul tube behind the iris are insufficiently known, successful positioning of the tube may require slightly more surgery time and the risk of hyphaema may be higher. It is expected, that in the long run damage to the corneal endothelium is less. Risks of study-related assessments are negligible, burden is low, extra time is about 35+15+35+35 minutes (total 2h).
Comparing the Baerveldt and Paul Glaucoma Drainage Devices and Their Effects on the Corneal Endothelium...
GlaucomaRationale: The Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device (GDD) successfully reduces intraocular pressure but also involves a risk of corneal endothelial deterioration. Supposedly, the tip of a GDD tube with a thinner diameter, such as the Paul implant, will remain at a larger distance from the cornea and, thereby, cause less damage. Objective: To determine whether the Paul tube induces less damage to the corneal endothelium than the Baerveldt GDD. Study design: Randomized clinical trial. Study population: Phakic patients scheduled for surgical GDD implantation. Intervention: Either a Baerveldt or a Paul GDD implant. Main study parameters/endpoints: Endothelial cell density and tube position at 24 months. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The Paul GDD may have a less harmful effect on corneal endothelium. Otherwise, both GDDs will probably have a similar risk/benefit profile. The risks of study-related assessments are negligible, burden is low, extra time is about 5 x 1.5 h (total 7.5 h) in two years.
Cataract Surgery in Conjunction With Ab-interno Canaloplasty Compared to Cataract Surgery Only in...
Primary Open Angle GlaucomaA prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked, post-market clinical trial comparing cataract surgery in conjunction with ab-interno canaloplasty utilizing the iTrack Advance canaloplasty device (Nova Eye, Inc.) to cataract surgery only in patients with mild to moderate, primary open angle glaucoma. Subjects will be followed for 12 months.
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Optic Neuropathies
GlaucomaGlaucoma2 moreThe overall aim of this study is to see whether long-term electrical stimulation with a home-stimulation device works well and is safe for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Open-Angle Glaucoma is a disease where the nerves in the back of your eye die off faster than expected regardless of your eye pressure.
Evaluation of Minimal Invasive Glaucoma Surgery
GlaucomaGlaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease with an accelerated and progressiv retinal ganglion cell loss and concomitant visual field defects. Glaucoma can be treated with eye drops, laser therapy or surgery. Various surgical approaches to lower intraocular pressure are available, amongst which trabeculectomy is the gold standard. Recently minimal invasive glaucoma surgery has been introduced and has become a good alternative to trabeculectomy. Randomized clinical trials investigating the postoperative outcomes of various types of glaucoma surgery are limited.
The Glaucoma Nicotinamide Trial
GlaucomaThe Glaucoma Nicotinamide Trial (TGNT) is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-masked clinical trial composed of two cohorts; The Swedish Glaucoma Nicotinamide Trial (SGNT) and the Vitamin B3 In Glaucoma Study (VBIGS). Patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) will be randomized to receive either Nicotinamide or placebo through block randomization stratified by glaucoma subtype with a 1:1 allocation.
Glaucoma Drainage Device and Endothelial Cell Loss Compare Trial
GlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage Device and Endothelial Cell Loss Compare Trial (DECLARE) is a multi-center, outcome-masked, randomized clinical trial. The purpose of this study is to compare glaucoma drainage device implantation in the anterior chamber (front part of the eye) and sulcus (small space between iris and front chamber of the eye) in efforts to minimize cell loss in the eye.
Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Glaucoma
GlaucomaGlaucoma1 moreThe overall aim of this study is to see whether long-term electrical stimulation with a home-stimulation device works well and is safe for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Open-Angle Glaucoma is a disease where the nerves in the back of your eye die off faster than expected regardless of your eye pressure.
Alternate Nostril Breathing Training in Geriatrics With Glaucoma and High Blood Pressure
Primary Open Angle GlaucomaHypertensionHypertension, particularly if poorly controlled, appears related to an increased risk of open angle glaucoma, (the high tension type of glaucoma is characterized as optic nerve degeneration with ocular hypertension). so this study will search response of glaucoma to breathing exercise