Active clinical trials for "Migraine Disorders"

Randomized pilot feasibility study evaluating the impact of introducing behavioral treatment for migraine in the Emergency Department (ED) and prescribing migraine preventive medications in the ED. The study will examine the effect of these treatments, both individually and in combination, on pain severity and headache-related disability. This study is designed to examine the feasibility of comparing four interventions for ED patients presenting with migraine. Group 1: Starting topiramate; Group 2: Doing a brief behavioral intervention; Group 3: Treating with combination therapy of topiramate and behavioral intervention; and Group 4: Standard of Care.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a fixed-dose combination of naratriptan 2,5 mg + naproxen 500 mg is effective and safe compared each monotherapy for the acute treatment of migraine.

Migraine is a widespread, debilitating, chronic pain disorder and a major public health challenge. Most conventional, pharmaceutical treatments fail to give satisfactory long-term relief and their repeated use can have important side effects. This project involves implementation of substantial dietary changes in adults with migraine. Our goal is to test the hypothesis that a causal relationship exists between migraine symptoms and the amount and proportions of foods consumed containing defined amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Significant findings supporting the hypothesis will lead to a major shift in both prevention and management of migraine and other chronic pain disorders. Emphasis is on low-cost, health improvement strategies utilizing specific dietary modifications for pain management, based on solid clinical research evidence.

This study evaluates the non-inferiority of Cefaliv® compared to Neosaldina® in the treatment of migraine attack in two hundred and sixteen adults of both sexes with age between eighteen and sixty five years old. The first Half of participants will receive Cefaliv®, the other half will receive Neosaldina®.

Vestibular migraine (VM) and chronic subjective dizziness (CSD) commonly cause vertigo, unsteadiness and dizziness. Clinical investigators are studying these illnesses to understand them better. VM and CSD occur together in about 1/3 of patients. That makes it hard to diagnose them accurately and decide what treatments to use. As a result, doctors and patients may be confused about these diagnoses. The goal of this study was use two different medications to tease apart the symptoms of VM and CSD. Patients who have VM and CSD together were given either verapamil or sertraline for 12 weeks. These medications are used to treat VM and CSD, though they are not approved for this purpose. Verapamil is believed to have stronger effects on symptoms of VM. Sertraline is believed to have stronger effects on symptoms of CSD. By comparing the responses of patients to these two medications, the researchers hoped to learn more about the key features of VM and CSD.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether erenumab is safe and well tolerated in healthy adults and migraine patients. As part of the secondary objectives, this study will be conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of erenumab after single subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) doses in healthy participants and migraine patients as well as to characterize the effect of erenumab on the capsaicin-induced increase in dermal blood flow after single SC or IV doses in healthy participants and migraine patients.

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of prochlorperazine and ketorolac in combination lead in a larger reduction in pain score compared to prochlorperazine alone when treating pediatric migraine in the Emergency Department (ED). Our hypothesis is that this combination of medications treats not only the pain but also the associated gastrointestinal symptoms of migraine. The main outcome of this study is the reduction in the patient's pain score at 60 minutes from administration of the study medications. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients achieving complete resolution of the headache while in the ED, the number of patients requiring additional treatment interventions by the treating physician, the number of patients with resolution of the associated symptoms like nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia, the recurrence of headache in the 48-72 hours after discharge, and side effects of the medications.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MK-6096 versus placebo for preventing migraines in participants with episodic migraine. After a 28-day Screening period during which baseline number of monthly migraine days was assessed, participants were randomized to receive MK-6096 or placebo for a 12-week Treatment Period. Participants who completed all 12 weeks of the Treatment Period received drug or placebo for an additional 2 weeks in the Run-out Period. Treatment assignment in the Run-out Period was determined at the initial randomization. In the Run-out Period, participants who received placebo in the Treatment Period continued to receive placebo and participants who received MK-6096 in the Treatment Period 2 received either MK-6096 or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The hypothesis tested in the study is that MK-6096 10 mg is superior to placebo in reducing migraine frequency as measured by the mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days averaged over the 12- week treatment period.

Overall trial objectives: Can treatment with tonabersat reduce the number of days with a migraine headache in patients who suffer from frequent migraine attacks How well tolerated is treatment with tonabersat The study is based on the hypothesis that the unique mechanism of action of tonabersat will inhibit some of the early events in the generation of migraine and so be effective as prophylactic treatment

Overall trial objectives: Can treatment with tonabersat reduce the number of days with aura and/or migraine headache in patients with migraine with aura How well tolerated is treatment with tonabersat The study is based on the hypothesis that the unique mechanism of action of tonabersat will inhibit some of the early events in the generation of aura and migraine headache and so be effective as prophylactic treatment