Active clinical trials for "Infections"

An Investigator-initiated, Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of SARS-Cov-2 Post Exposure Prophylaxis and Safety of HH-120 nasal spray

To demonstrate the prophylactic effect of calcium sulfate beads loaded with antibiotic in patients with non-modifiable risk factors that will undergo a hip or knee joint replacement, comparing with a control group. To know the economic cost generated in antibiotic prophylaxis with calcium sulfate beads in patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement with non-modifiable risk factors.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of AGS-v PLUS, a universal mosquito-borne disease and mosquito control vaccine, in healthy volunteers.

This is a 64-patient, 90-day, open -label study on adult patients undergoing below knee amputation for various etiologies. The objective of this study is to assess surgical wound healing and wound bioburden using combination treatment of Next Science SurgX™ Antimicrobial Wound Gel and BlastX™ Antimicrobial Wound Gels as compared to standard of care.

Time of showering after surgery is still a controversial issue for surgical patients and health professionals. It has been reported that patients should not shower until sutures are removed since traditionally showering is thought to cause infections after surgery. However, not showering after surgery not only has a negative effect on patient comfort but also brings about the risk of infections. Sternal wound infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery through median sternotomy are one of the important, life-threatening complications. For this reasons, the investigators researched the advantages and disadvantages of showering for postoperative sternal wound infections, pain due to sternotomy and patient comfort and satisfaction.

Effective cleaning of surfaces in the hospital environment is an absolute necessity to reduce pathogen transmission. Multi Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) in ICU are among the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections. Today, the growing prevalence of MDRO has made it more important than ever to clean contaminated surfaces with appropriate aseptic cleaning procedures, to protect patients and personnel. Despite the disinfection and sterilization methods, microorganisms that reach a sufficient concentration in the hospital environment survive for long periods and can cause serious transmission via contaminated hands of healthcare workers. In this context, surface cleaning and disinfection procedures in the hospital environment reduce cross-contamination of the health care units and disease-causing pathogens. Recently, environmental cleaning and disinfection have become important as well as the evaluation of cleanliness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of BCA method, which is a new approach in evaluating the effectiveness of environmental cleanliness in intensive care units. fluoroscan gel marking, microbiological sampling and BCA assay methods will be compared to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of the BCA method. (PRO1 Micro Hygiene Monitoring System that System consisting of protein pen and device that analyzes with BCA method).

Acute diarrhea and acute colitis of infectious origin are common reasons for consultation at the emergency department. The current etiological diagnostic approach is limited to the determination of markers of inflammation, such as CRP and blood leukocytes, which lack specificity and sensitivity for bacterial infection. The stool culture can detect bacterial pathogens in the stool with a result at least 48 hours later and a positivity rate <50%. This study will describe the procalcitonin (PCT) concentrations (a biomarker of bacterial infection) in this population to evaluate its usefulness depending on the viral or bacterial etiology identified by stool multiplex gastro-intestinal PCR panel (GI panel) and stool culture. The investigators hypothesize that PCT levels will be higher if the GI panel or the stool culture identifies a bacteria or a parasite, as it is the case in respiratory tract infections. If there is a detection of a virus by the GI panel or both the stool culture and the GI panel are negative, the investigators expect that PCT values will be lower or negative. the investigators will include the patients admitted to the ED with a suspicion of infectious diarrhea or acute colitis in order to have a large representative panel of infectious diarrhea etiologies. Only the patients having a blood sample prescribed as the routine care will be included. The blood sample is useful for dosing CRP and whole blood cell count (WBC), which are part of current biologic analyses performed in this context. After getting the patient's consent, the investigator will add the PCT dosage in blood sampling and will ask the patient to provide a stool sample, in order to have a stool culture and to perform an extended investigation for the pathogens through multiplex PCR technology (Filmarray ®GI panel). The physician will be asked if all these results (the ones ordered currently together with the dosage of PCT and the GI panel) will change his/her decision to start an antibiotic. Patients will receive a phone call at day 15 after their initial admission in the emergency department and will be asked if he/she has consulted a new physician or if a new treatment by antibiotics was started. Data collection procedures: Data from the medical file will be collected by the investigators and the emergency department clinical research assistant. All the data will be pseudonymized. The collection will be done at the day of admission in the emergency department and after the phone interview at Day15.

The current sars-cov-2 epidemic is responsible for severe respiratory infections leading to end-of-life situations. Dexmedetomidine may be indicated in mild to moderate sedation in palliative patients, due to its pharmacological characteristics. The hypothesis of this study is that Dexmedetomidine would allow effective and safe light sedation in patients with respiratory failure in palliative situations suffering from Covid-19 infection.

This study seeks to determine whether dual or quadruple therapy is more effective in treating COVID-19.

Introduction: The SARS Co-2 contagious rate is high (Ro: 2.0-3.0). The infection is aggressive with high pathogenicity. Global confinement impacts all social and economic fields of human activity. Clinical behavior exceeds the capabilities of public health care. With the initial information on the pandemic, it is estimated that 20% of health personnel in direct contact with patients can acquire the disease, despite preventive self-care. The molecular relationship of COVID-19 with the subject's ACE2 protein encourages the virus to enter the host cell, and initiates replication and the immune response, causing an imbalance generating an immunological storm of cytokines, with serious damage to the host. Objective: It is proposed to supply a combined scheme of two compounds by oropharyngeal spray that captures the virus before entering the target cell and orally administer immunomodulatory compounds that regulate the inflammatory response released by the virus, in order to improve the antiviral response. Methodology: A controlled, parallel design, triple-blind, phase II clinical trial will be conducted with two study groups to compare the active compounds (oropharyngeal spray and emulsion) with placebo. Discussion: With the application of the combined scheme of two compounds, a 75% reduction in infection is expected for workers in direct contact with COVID patients.