Active clinical trials for "Infertility, Male"

Korean Red ginseng (KRG) has long been applied to various diseases as a health-promoting herbal medicine in Korea. Many clinical studies of ginseng have been performed to elucidate its therapeutic characteristics. KRG has been shown to be effective in many diseases, such as cancers, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, and sexual dysfunction. Several studies have indicated effects of ginseng on improving spermatogenesis in animals. The major mechanisms behind these effects were speculated to be anti-oxidant and anti-aging effects, as well as modulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-testis axis [7 - 10]. However, there have been no controlled human clinical trials to evaluate the effects of KRG on spermatogenesis in patients with male infertility. Only a small proportion of causes of male infertility are currently curable, including male hypogonadal disorders that can be cured by gonadotropic agents, and obstructive azoospermia that can be corrected by surgery. In addition, evidence-based medicine has revealed that most empirical treatments are ineffective. Similarly, the efficacies of carnitine, anti-estrogens, kallikrein, vitamins C and E, and glutathione have not been confirmed. Therefore, the investigators investigated the effects of KRG on semen parameters in male infertility patients. This is the first placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the therapeutic effects of KRG in male patients.

Objective: Several in vitro studies report positive effects of ginseng on spermatogenesis. However, no controlled human clinical study of the effect of Korean red ginseng (KRG) on spermatogenesis has been performed. This study was performed to investigate the effects of KRG on semen parameters in male infertility patients in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Methods: A total of 80 male infertility patients with varicocele were recruited from April 2011 to February 2012. The subjects were then divided into the following four groups: non-V + P group, placebo; V + P group, placebo and varicocelectomy; non-V + KRG group, 1.5-g KRG daily; V + KGR group, 1.5-g KRG daily and varicocelectomy. Semen analysis was performed and hormonal levels were measured in each treatment arm after 12 weeks.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Punalpin, an antioxidant, has a positive impact on DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa in male fertility patients with increased amount of DNA fragmentation in their spermatozoa. Secondary purpose is to investigate whether there is any positive effect on the subsequent pregnancy rates from the fertility treatment.

The ideal stimulation protocol for ovarian stimulation is under constant debate, as we gain more pharmacological control over the patient hormonal milieu. Specifically, the debate focuses around the ideal LH levels. The concept of an "LH window" was suggested. The need for a threshold level of LH is clearly demonstrated in hypogonado-tropic hypogonadism patients, but also in cycling patients receiving high doses of GnRH antagonist. The Ganirelix dose finding study demonstrated very low implantation rates in the high dose groups (1 mg, 2 mg). The stimulation dynamics in these patients were remarkable for very low E2 and LH levels on the day of hCG. In fact, a functional state of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is achieved, explaining the poor clinical results (1.5% implantation rate under 2 mg Ganirelix). The same protocol was repeated with added Luveris resulting in excellent pregnancy rates. The recommended daily dose of GnRH antagonist is 0.25 mg which on the average provides a protection from premature LH surge, with moderate suppression of LH. Therefore, most patients do not need supplemented LH after the antagonist is initiated. However, there is a subgroup of patients who hyper-respond to the antagonist (in 0.25 mg dose) with a sharp decrease in LH. This explains contradictory findings in the available studies. The basic assumption in the background of this proposal is that there is a wide range of pituitary responses to GnRH antagonist. Obeying a bell-shape curve, most women have an average response, however, some hypo-respond might ovulate prematurely, and others hyper-respond. In the latter cases, pituitary response will behave as if exposed to a higher dose. How to identify an exposure to a presumed higher dose? Below is a figure from the original paper. A close look indicates that the immediate response to all Ganirelix doses are similar in terms of LH drop, however, the big difference lies in the pituitary recovery 24 hours post Ganirelix dose. While small doses allow for a quick recovery to almost pre-treatment LH levels, high doses result in incomplete recovery. Hence, it is reasonable to speculate that the high response to 0.25 mg dose will lead to slow or incomplete recovery of LH levels 24 hours post the initial dose. It is estimated that about 15% of patients are antagonist hyper-responders. Efforts to individualize patient protocol must target this group as candidates for supplemented LH. This estimate is similar to study findings: Huirne et al Human Reproduction 2005, 20: 359.

To determine the significance of systemic RANKL inhibition for male reproduction, conducting a clinical controlled randomized double blinded intervention study on infertile men, to investigating whether Denosumab (Prolia) can increase semen quality and to investigate what subgroup of infertile men that might benefit from treatment.

The cause of infertility can be due to a female factor or a male factor. In case of a male factor, it is often due to poor semen quality. However, the cause of poor quality is often unknown. In previous research, infertility problems in men were related to chemical processes in metabolism causing the formation of free radicals. Free radicals are physiological by-products of our body mechanisms. Free radicals are very reactive and can therefore react with a lot of molecules of cells within our body and cause damage. A balance between free radicals, which are also needed for physiological processes in the body, and antioxidants, which defuses the reactive free radicals, is most desirable. However, as stated in literature, there are a lot of factors that can influence extra free radical production, which causes overloading of the system, resulting in damage on cellular level. Free radicals in semen plasma and on the sperm cell could play a role in male infertility. Nonetheless, free radicals are not used as diagnostic markers due to the lack of detection systems, as free radicals are very short-lived. This study aims to introduce a new technique, called diamond magnetometry, to measure free radicals directly on the sperm cell and in serum. Diamond magnetometry involves very small diamond particles as magnetic sensors that engage a reaction with the free radicals on the sperm cell, causing signals that can be measured. To compare local free radical production with systemic free radical production, other diagnostic biomarkers are also measured in serum. It is hypothesized that the composition of seminal microbiome could influence the free radical concentration. Therefore, this study also aims to explore the microbiota composition and see if this has an influence in semen quality and free radical production. At last, this study also want to correlate standard semen parameters (defined by the World Health Organisation), lifestyle factors and food intake, to detect a role for lifestyle in the production of free radicals.

A non-pharmacological study, which examines the effect of lifestyle intervention on sperm quality among men in fertility treatment. The primary endpoint is to increase the total amount of motile sperm in male patients undergoing fertility treatment

Spermotrend is a natural based product manufactured by Catalysis Laboratories. Its composition contains different essential elements for spermatogenesis: selenium, zinc and fructose. In addition, it contains L-arginine, natural precursor of nitric oxide that favors vasodilation, and pygeum africanum extract with antioxidant, antiinflammatory, antiandrogenic and antiproliferative action. Its main action resides in the control of oxidative damage to the tissues of the male reproductive system, as well as the control of correct spermatogenesis. Given that sperm quality can be altered by oxidative stress and that male infertility affects more and more people, the prevention and management of this deterioration becomes increasingly important. Therefore, to evaluate Spermotrend as a new therapy for male infertility, the investigators are going to study the safety and efficacy of this treatment in this clinical trial. RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS The treatment with Spermotrend improves the parameters of the spermatogenesis. GENERAL OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety level of the natural Spermotrend product in the treatment of male infertility. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES Evaluate the increase in sperm motility and concentration. Identify the improvement in the seminal fluid volume. Identify the positive changes in the sperm morphology. Determine how to maintain the semen analysis in a normal range. Describe the adverse effects. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES Identify the improvement in urinary symptoms related with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Identify the improvement in varicocele.

Male from infertile couples are tested for semen analysis and sperm DNA fragmentation. Any case with high DNA fragmentation index (DFI) will be randomized indicated for multi-micro nutrient supplement (PROfortil™) in 3 months and then checked again post-treatment for (DFI). The IVF/ICSI cycles will be analyzed for pregnancy outcomes

The objective of the Males, Antioxidants, and Infertility (MOXI) Trial is to examine whether treatment of infertile males with an antioxidant formulation improves male fertility. The central hypothesis is that treatment of infertile males with antioxidants will improve sperm structure and function, resulting in higher fertilization rates and improved embryo development, leading to higher pregnancy and live birth rates. Findings from this research will be significant in that they will likely lead to an effective, non-hormonal treatment modality for male infertility. An effective treatment for men would also reduce the treatment burden on the female partner, lower costs, and provide effective alternatives to couples with religious or ethical contraindications to ART (Assisted Reproductive Technology). If antioxidants do not improve pregnancy rates, but do improve sperm motility and DNA integrity, they could allow for couples with male factor infertility to use less intensive therapies such as intrauterine insemination. Male fertility specialists currently prescribe antioxidants based on the limited data supporting their use. A negative finding, lack of any benefit, would also alter current treatment of infertile males.