Active clinical trials for "Hernia, Inguinal"

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, third-party blinded, multicenter, interventional evaluation of inguinal hernia repair comparing Strattice to light weight polypropylene mesh. Performance and outcomes measures to be compared include postoperative resumption of activities of daily living, nature and incidence of short- and long-term pain and complications, and incidence of hernia recurrence.

Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair has become a major concern. Although tension-free Lichtenstein technique is used and new lightweight meshes have been developed, still up to 40 % of patients complain of some kind of pain even one year after surgery. The necessity of mesh-fixation using sutures, could be causative. However, current data do not provide evidence whether suture fixation in Lichtenstein repair might be the reason for chronic postoperative pain. A newly developed selfgrip-mesh enables sutureless fixation of the mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Hereby a polypropylene mesh is combined with a resorbable polylactic-acid gripping system. Thereby the rate of chronic postoperative pain could be decreased. Two techniques of inguinal hernia repair will be evaluated: open anterior mesh repair using conventional Lichtenstein technique (sutures for mesh-fixation) open anterior mesh repair using a selfgrip mesh (polylactic-acid gripping system for mesh fixation) Postoperative pain will be evaluated by visual analog scale and Mc Gill pain questionaire at the 10th day, as well as 3 and 15 months postoperatively.

Inguinal hernia is a common disease, which is treated surgically when symptomatic. Pain after open inguinal hernia surgery can affect the patient significantly and weaken their quality of life. The aim of this study is to find out if the choice of mesh affects postoperative pain and therefore causes more contacts to the health care center. Our goal is also to find out how the pain affects the patients´ quality of life.

A prospective randomized study involved 228 individuals with primary inguinal hernia, operated in our departments, between January 2015 to February 2018. The duration of hospital stay, operative time, duration of returning to routine activities, postsurgical sequels and recurrence rates estimated. We randomly allocated it into two groups: mesh repair was applied to 166 patients (Group 1) and combined both mesh, and darn repair applied to 162 patients (Group 2).

Laparoscopic management of recurrent inguinal hernia in children has been recently introduced in surgical practice. One of the most important advantages of using the laparoscopic approach in cases with recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH) is that it avoids the previous operation site thus avoiding injuries to the vas and vessels [19]. Some authors designed a study to compare laparoscopic hernia repairs with classical open repairs for pediatric RIH following the first open repair. They stated that avoiding the scarred tissue the former operation area with the laparoscopic approach facilitates the procedure and decreases both the operative time and complication rate. [5]. Further, it is as simple as a fresh hernia repair because the time taken for the repair of recurrent hernia laparoscopically was the same as the fresh laparoscopic repair with no added complication [5,20]. In laparoscopic surgery, approaching the hernia defect from within the abdomen, makes the area of interest bloodless, and the magnification renders anatomy very clear, making surgery precise [6,7].

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether preperitoneal mesh placement using a nitinol containing large pore polypropylene mesh (REBOUND HRD™) offers a satisfying patient recovery, quick reconvalescence and adequate tissue integration with acceptable mesh contraction in a multicenter (Belgian) prospective trial. Patients treated by open preperitoneal mesh repair for an unilateral inguinal hernia according the current surgical practice in the participating centers will be observed during one year post-surgery, after which they will have a CT scan of the surgical area in the groin to evaluate the mesh changes regarding shrinkage and migration.

The aim of the present study is to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in decreased rate of chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair.

The objective of the study is to evaluate pain and disabling complications inducing social consequences in primary inguinal hernia ProGrip mesh repair compared to Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh.

Repair of unilateral inguinal hernia in infants. Laparoscopic repair, with closure of contralateral patent processus vaginalis if present, versus open repair

The purpose of this study is to determine whether prophylactic antibiotic use in inguinal hernioplasty are effective in prevention of infectious complication.