Active clinical trials for "Spinal Cord Injuries"

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of non-invasive (transcutaneous) closed-loop electrical spinal cord stimulation for recovery of upper limb function (Aim 1) and spasticity (Aim 2) following spinal cord injury.

The prevalence of autonomic dysfunction and sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is increased in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The loss of autonomic control results in autonomic dysreflexia (AD) and orthostatic hypotension (OH) which explains the increase in cardiovascular related mortality in these Veterans. There is no effective prophylaxis for autonomic dysfunction. The lack of prophylactic treatment for autonomic dysfunction, and no best clinical practices for SDB in SCI, are significant health concerns for Veterans with SCI. Therefore, the investigators will investigate the effectiveness of mild intermittent hypoxia (MIH) as a prophylactic for autonomic dysfunction in patients with SCI. The investigators propose that MIH targets several mechanisms associated with autonomic control and the co-morbidities associated with SDB. Specifically, exposure to MIH will promote restoration of homeostatic BP control, which would be beneficial to participation in daily activities and independence in those with SCI.

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of the ARC-IM Therapy to improve hemodynamic management in people with sub-acute or chronic spinal cord injury. Participants will be implanted with the ARC-IM Thoracic System which aim to deliver, at the low thoracic level, targeted epidural electrical stimulation that will support natural hemodynamic control.

This study is conducted to assess the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation Vs limb loading exercises on hand grip strength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute cervical spinal cord injury.

This randomized controlled trial aims to assess effects of videoconferencing acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on mental health outcomes in individuals living with spinal cord injuries (SCI). A total of 40 individuals living with SCI sustained within 5 years and experiencing depressive symptoms will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the ACT group or the wait-list control group. The ACT group will receive 8 weekly individual ACT sessions guided by a coach through videoconferencing. The wait-list group will receive ACT sessions after the study period ends. We will provide psychoeducation materials related to SCI as supplemental resources to both groups. Mental health outcomes using self-reported questionnaires will be collected at pretest, posttest, and 2-month follow-up. Exploratory hypotheses are that the group undergoing the ACT intervention supplemented with psychoeducation will show improvements in mental health outcomes (e.g., depression) and ACT processes (e.g., psychological flexibility) at posttest and 2-month follow-up, compared to the wait-list control group provided with psychoeducation materials alone. Interviews will be conducted at posttest to explore the participants' experiences in ACT.

Bowel issues occur in nearly all people after spinal cord injury (SCI) and one major complication is fecal incontinence (accidents). This complication has been repeatedly highlighted by people living with SCI as particularly life-limiting and in need of more options for interventions. This study will test the effect of genital nerve stimulation (GNS), with non-invasive electrodes, on the activity of the anus and rectum of persons after SCI. Recording anorectal manometry (ARM) endpoints tells us the function of those tissues and our study design (ARM without stim, ARM with stim, ARM without stim) will allow us to conclude the GNS effect and whether it is likely to reduce fecal incontinence. The study will also collect medical, demographic, and bowel related functional information. The combination of all of these data should help predict who will respond to stimulation, what will happen when stimulation is applied, and if that stimulation is likely to provide an improvement in fecal continence for people living with SCI.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the short-term effects of 3 approved FDA drugs (cyproheptadine (CPH), carbidopa-levodopa (CD-LD), and atomoxetine (ATX)) on motor responses when delivered in combination with hand training exercises in people with chronic spinal cord injury. The goal is to learn how to better strengthen connections between the brain and spinal cord after spinal cord injury, and if this connection is improved by one(or more) of the drugs. Multiple aspects of nerve transmission and muscle response will be measured via noninvasive brain and spinal cord stimulation, along with motor performance (dexterity and strength).

This study aims to determine the effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation to increase blood pressure and use that device to increase exercise endurance time and heart rate recovery during arm cycle ergometry. In addition, the investigators will see if the stimulation helps regulate body temperature when in a cool environment.

Following a cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI; damage to the spinal cord at the neck) there is catastrophic loss of hand and grip function. This has a devastating effect on quality of life and functional independence. Thus, there is a real need to identify and optimise therapy to aid functional arm and hand recovery. One such therapy is Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (tCES). This involves applying sticky pads to the skin and then transmitting a low-level electrical current to the spinal cord. This activates neural circuits, allowing injured nerves to transmit signals to muscles to produce movement while completing upper limb tasks. The purpose of this pilot project is to establish if and how tCES might be used to improve arm and hand control. The investigators will recruit 8 people who have had a cSCI for >1yr. First, the investigators will invite volunteers to the University for 2 weeks, twice per week, to establish their baseline movement capacity. Then the investigators will allocate the volunteers to one of two groups: group 1 will undertake 4 weeks of upper limb task practice (ULTP) followed by 4 weeks of ULTP+tCES; group 2 will undertake ULTP+tCES for 4 weeks followed by 4 weeks of ULTP. Participants will then complete a week (2 sessions) of post-intervention assessment. The investigators will then invite volunteers and carers to be interviewed about their experiences of being involved in the project. Finally, there will be 2 sessions of follow-up assessment after 3 months. In order to assess if and how ULTP+tCES affects arm and hand control the investigators will measure: movement capacity using standard clinical tests; muscular activity in response to brain/spinal stimulation; how fast and smooth movements are when reaching and grasping objects. The investigators will also examine how the intervention has affected Quality of Life (QoL) and independence (Spinal Cord Independence Measure).

The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects of robotic gait training (RGT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continued through early outpatient rehabilitation