Active clinical trials for "Intestinal Neoplasms"

This study aims to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended Phase 3 dose (RP3D) of RYZ101 in Part 1, and the safety, efficacy, and PK of RYZ101 compared with investigator-selected standard of care (SoC) therapy in Part 2 in subjects with inoperable, advanced, well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor expressing (SSTR+) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) that have progressed following treatment with Lutetium 177-labelled somatostatin analogue (177Lu-SSA) therapy, such as 177Lu-DOTATATE or 177Lu-DOTATOC (177Lu-DOTATATE/TOC), or 177Lu-high affinity [HA]-DOTATATE.

This phase II trial studies how well abemaciclib works in treating patients with digestive system neuroendocrine tumors that have spread to other places in the body, do not respond to treatment, and cannot be removed by surgery. Abemaciclib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.

Ciprofol is a new anesthetic, which combines with γ- Aminobutyric acid-a (GABAA) receptor. Ciprofol has shown equivalent anesthetic efficacy of propofol at 1/4 to 1/5 of the dosage. Ciprofol has the pharmacodynamic characteristics of rapid onset, stable and rapid recovery. Phase III clinical results showed that the incidence of injection pain and respiratory and circulatory depression of ciprofol was lower than that of propofol. Therefore, ciprofol has a good application prospect in sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially for obese patients. In the current study, we would explore the proper dose of Ciprofol in sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy in obese patients.

A Phase 2 multi-center, open-label, single arm study of nab-sirolimus in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastrointestinal tract, lung, or pancreas who have not received prior treatment with mTOR inhibitors

The purpose of this study is to learn about the feasibility and safety of using Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) before and after surgical removal of a tumor. PRRT treatment is based on the administration of a radioactive product, 177-Lu DOTA-0-Tyr3-Octreotate (Lutathera®) and its use before and after surgery is thought to increase the overall survival benefit for patients with SSTR-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors GEP-NETs.

This study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of JAB-21822 in combination with cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer，advanced small intestine cancer and advanced appendiceal cancer with KRAS p.G12C mutation.

This is a Phase II study to determine the efficacy of SBRT to treat liver metastases in patients with Colorectal Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma of the Anal Canal and Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors that are not amenable to surgery. Patients should have no evidence of extra-hepatic disease or have disease that is planned to be treated with curative intent. Therefore, SBRT is being considered as a potentially curative procedure.

Exploring the effect of protective ileostomy compared with transverse colostomy on the occurrence of complications, the occurrence of serious side effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and disease recurrence in patients with low rectal cancer after radical surgery from the perspective of intestinal microecology.

PT217 is a bispecific antibody (bsAb) against human DLL3 (huDLL3) and human CD47 (huCD47). This is an open label, Phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of PT217 in subjects with advanced or refractory cancers. Patients with the following tumor types will be eligible for screening: unresectable or small cell lung cancer (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC), neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). Subjects must have progressed after standard therapy (platinum-based chemotherapy) or standard therapy has proven to be ineffective, intolerable or was considered inappropriate.

The primary objective is to determine the clinical efficacy of treatment regimen in terms of objective response rate (ORR). The secondary objectives is to determine the clinical efficacy of the study treatment in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, to characterize the safety and toxicity profile of the study treatment as measured by the adverse event rates.