Active clinical trials for "Ischemia"

A transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord, or retinal ischemia, without acute infarction. An ischemic stroke is a cerebral infarction. In POINT, eligibility is limited to brain TIAs and to minor ischemic strokes (with an NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score less than or equal to 3). TIAs are common [25], and are often harbingers of disabling strokes. Approximately 250,000-350,000 TIAs are diagnosed each year in the US. Given median survival of more than 8 years [32], there are approximately 2.4 million TIA survivors. In a national survey, one in fifteen of those over 65 years old reported a history of TIA [33], which is equivalent to a prevalence of 2.3 million in older Americans. Based on the prevalence of undiagnosed transient neurological events, the true incidence of TIA may be twice as high as the rates of diagnosis [33]. Based on our review of the National Inpatient Sample for 1997-2003, there were an average of 200,000 hospital admissions for TIA each year, with annual charges climbing quickly in the period to $2.6 billion in 2003. Composite endpoint of new ischemic vascular events: ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or ischemic vascular death at 90 days.

This is a prospective, non-randomized study to determine the feasibility of using a new technique called Dynamic Substrate Mapping (DSM) to help guide the treatment of ischemic ventricular tachycardia (IVT). We hypothesize that DSM will lead to simpler, more effective ablation of IVT. Results from this study will be used to determine if further clinical investigation is warranted.

PROMISE aims at identifying novel diagnostic and prognostic circulating biomarkers for patients with acute stroke and at informing on crucial yet undetected pathophysiological mechanisms driving outcome after stroke by enriching all phenotypic information available from clinical routine with in-depth quantification of the circulating proteome and metabolome as well as other entities.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is a proven treatment for heart failure. CRT consists of a special pacemaker with two/three leads (insulated wires which take the electrical impulses from the device to the heart), one in the right ventricle, one in a vein on the outer surface of the left ventricle (in a vessel called coronary sinus or CS) and sometimes one in the right atrium (right top chamber of the heart). Tiny electrical impulses are simultaneously sent to the ventricles to make them beating together again in a more synchronised pattern. This leads to a coordinated, synchronous pumping action that, in most patients, translates into improved heart failure symptoms and improved quality and quantity of life, reducing the chance of being admitted to hospital with worsening heart failure. Unfortunately up to one third of the patients do not benefit from CRT therapy and to date there are no useful criteria to predict the response to CRT. In an effort to improve the response rate to CRT, alternative methods have been developed. In particular, a new technology called MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) has recently become available. It allows simultaneous stimulation of 2 different points in the left ventricle by using a single lead with four electrodes. This strategy should improve the pumping function of the heart by recruiting a larger mass of muscle. Although MPP is as safe and as effective as standard CRT pacing, the improvements to date in the heart pump function it gives over standard CRT pacing are variable and small. Recent evidence suggests that MPP pacing could be particularly beneficial in some subgroups of patients, in particular patients with a previous history of heart attack resulting in scar formation in the left ventricle. The investigators hypothesize that MPP works better when the lead is closer to the scar because this allows recruitment of areas with slow conduction, thus increasing synchronization further. To this aim, they plan to compare, in each patient, the acute response produced by MPP on the cardiac function when the CS lead is placed close to myocardial scar and when it is placed far from scar respectively.

To compare the impact of revascularization and Optimal Medical Treatment (OMT) on the extent of severely reduced coronary flow capacity in stable ischemic heart disease.

The primary objective of this study is to collect safety and performance data on the Indigo Aspiration System in a patient population with lower extremity acute limb ischemia (LE ALI).

The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the safety and feasibility of Autologous Muscle-derived Cells (AMDC; a preparation of a patient's own cells) as a treatment for patients with advanced heart failure caused by ischemia.

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG0001 in Subjects with Critical Limb Ischemia.

The purpose of this study is to determine if early ablation (i.e., ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with infrequent VT episodes) is more effective than medical therapy alone for the treatment of ischemic ventricular tachycardia in patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) who continue to have episodes of ventricular tachycardia despite drug therapy.

Ischaemic strokes (those caused by blockage in an artery in the brain caused by a blood clot) can be treated with very early use of clot-busting (thrombolytic) drugs to attempt to restore the blood supply and limit the damage, resulting in an increased proportion of people making a recovery to independence after stroke. However, drug treatment only succeed in restoring blood flow in a minority of people with clots in the larger arteries (10-25% depending on the size of the blood vessel) and these people also have the most severe strokes and highest risk of death or dependence as a result of the stroke. Current best treatment is therefore least effective in the group with the most severe strokes. Devices that can be fed through the blood vessels to either remove or break up the blood clot in the brain vessels can open this type of large artery blockage. However, using these devices is a highly skilled procedure and it takes some time both to set up the necessary facilities (including anaesthetic, nurses and medical support) and to reach the blockage. The extra time that is required to use these devices may mean that brain tissue is already irreversibly damaged. If so, then an individual patient cannot benefit and indeed may be harmed by opening the artery. There are no completed clinical trials comparing the outcome in people treated with standard stroke treatment and those treated with devices. PISTE is a randomised, controlled trial to test whether additional mechanical thrombectomy device treatment improves functional outcome in patients with large artery occlusion who are given IV thrombolytic drug treatment as standard care.