Active clinical trials for "Jaw, Edentulous, Partially"

The purpose of this study is to see if OsseoSpeed™ implant 6 mm long is effective for rehabilitation of edentulism and if so, how it compares with OsseoSpeed™ implant 11 mm long. The primary hypothesis is that the alteration in bone level is equal in patients randomized to 6 mm as to patients randomized to 11 mm implants.

In this prospective case series study, 20 patients with an implant-borne single crown following early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation will be followed for 10 years. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters will be assessed. In addition, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be used at 10 years to examine the facial bone wall and compared to the 6 year data.

40 consecutive adult patients, requiring the insertion of dental implants in the aesthetic area (from second premolar to second premolar) will be enrolled in the study. At the time of surgery, a full thickness flap will be elevated, the implant bed will be prepared according to the manufacturer's instruction and the implants will be then seated into the bone. T0 corresponds to the time of implant insertion, T1 to the time of healing abutment's connection (T0=T1 for single stage implants), and T2 corresponds to 1-year follow-up from healing abutment's connection. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans will be taken immediately after abutment connection (T1) and 1-year after (T2). The midsagittal cut of each implant will be identified, and measurements will be made at predetermined levels. Horizontal facial bone thickness (HFBT) and Vertical facial bone level (VFBL) will be measured. HFBT will be measured at 0, 3, 6 and 9 mm apical to the implant platform. VFBL wil be the perpendicular distance from the implant platform to the most coronal point of the facial bone. Changes between T1 and T2 will be calculated.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare histological and histomorphometric results of six bone substitute materials used as graft in two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation model, after 6-month-healing.

To compare a flapless technique of alveolar ridge preservation to a flap technique to determine if preserving the periosteal blood supply would prevent loss of crestal ridge width and height.

The trial is designed as a consecutive enrollment prospective one-center study. A minimum of 30 patients will be included in the study. At implant installation, the patient will be randomized to receive one of the two types of implants (Control: internal hexagon connection implants (CON.INT); Test: Morse taper connection implants (MT-12)). Samples of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) and intrasulcular plaque will be collected at -21 (second-stage surgery), -14 (impressions), 0 (Baseline: prosthesis delivery), 7 days and 1, 3, 6, 12 months. Prosthesis will be fabricated and delivered as usual, i.e., approximately two weeks after the impressions are taken.

Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Membrane vs. no Membrane Approach to Grafting.

Ridge Preservation Comparing the Clinical and Histologic Healing of Flap vs. Flapless Approach to Grafting

The study, with the ASTRA TECH Implant System, is comparing short implants (OsseoSpeed™) to standard length implants (OsseoSpeed™) in combination with bone grafting. The hypothesis is that the use of short implants in posterior maxilla with inadequate bone is as safe and predictable as placing standard length implants in combination with bone augmentation.

Aim of the present study will be to evaluate if the platform switching and the flat abutment can modify the peri-implant marginal bone remodelling. A clinical assessment of the soft tissues will also be provided. 80 consecutively inserted dental implants will be included in this study. Maxillary and mandibular implants will be considered, both in frontal and posterior area. After 6 to 12 weeks, the definitive prosthetic abutment will be screwed and the temporary crown cemented. After 2 more months, the definitive porcelain crown will be delivered. The final outcomes will be collected after 1 year from implant insertion. Data will refer to the following timing: T0= implant installation T1= temporary crown cementation T2= definitive crown cementation T3= 1 year follow-up The 80 implants will be randomly divided into 4 groups of 20 implants each, with different implant/abutment design. Group 1: Tapered T3 Standard Collar implants + GingiHue abutments Group 2: Tapered T3 Standard Collar implants + Tissuemax IL abutments Group 3: Tapered T3 Prevail implants + GingiHue abutments Group 4: Tapered T3 Prevail implants + Tissuemax IL abutments On x-rays, the mesial and distal Marginal Bone Level will be measured and compared among and between the groups at the 4 different timing. Pocket Depth and Bleeding on probing (mesial, buccal, distal and lingual) will be measured at T0, T1, T2 and T3. Data will be statistically analyzed.