Active clinical trials for "Keloid"

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of AZX100 Drug Product and to determine whether it was effective in preventing or reducing re-growth of surgically removed keloid scars.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Protescal in preventing post caesarean section hypertrophic scar and keloid formation.

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of AZX100 Drug Product and to determine whether it was effective in preventing or reducing re-growth of surgically removed keloid scars.

To compare the effect of a class I pullulan based medical device containing Allium cepa & HA versus a class I medical device silicone gel on new post-surgical wounds

Keloid scars are common benign fibroproliferative reticular dermal lesions. Fibroblasts are considered to be the key cellular mediators of fibrogenesis in keloid scars. Thus this prospective study is going to investigate whether 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT may provide evidence for diagnosis and evaluate the effectiveness of treatment.

The pilot study is prospective, randomized, double-blinded, with intra-subject comparisons against a vehicle control. The primary objective of this pilot study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a new wound care product formulated to improve healing outcome, minimize complications of impaired healing and minimize the appearance of scars. This pilot study is double-blinded, which means that neither the evaluating physician nor the subject will know which treatment is administered. Subjects' with 2 comparable excision sites will be randomly assigned to use the FS2 restorative wound care product on one excision site and a vehicle formulation of the product on the other. At the discretion of the Principal Investigator, a sutured wound may be bisected for intra-wound comparison of treatments. In all cases, after application of either vehicle or FS2, a layer of petrolatum will be applied to cover the wound site as a standard of care.

To evaluate how safe and effective AIV001 treatment is on scar formation and/or keloid recurrence following keloidectomy.

Hypertrophic or keloid scars develop for about 39% to 68% of patients after surgery. The subjective opinion of the patient regarding the scar will often constitute the standard for judging the success or failure of the procedure. Surgical scars are not only a cosmetic concern but they can also cause pain, itching, discomfort, contracture, and other functional impairment. Various treatment options exists for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids, including intralesional steroid injection, dermabrasion, pressure therapy, surgical excision, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, pulse dye, and carbon dioxide laser ablation. However, these treatments often require multiple visits and have limited success. Therefore, prevention and early recognition of hypertrophic scars and keloids are very important in their management. Among preventive treatments available, silicone gel and onion extract gel have been marketed as products to improve the appearance and texture of surgical scars. Despite its popularity, data demonstrating the efficacy of these gels are lacking. Furthermore, there is no comparative study of silicone gel and onion extract gel for preventing postsurgical hypertrophic or keloid scars. The investigators therefore conducted this randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of silicone gel and onion extract gel for the prevention of postsurgical hypertrophic scars. The investigators also compared patient compliance and side effect between two topical gels.

Skin injuries due to trauma are relatively common, and patients are very concerned about scars caused by trauma and primary repair. Recently, the use of ablative and non-ablative lasers based on the fractional approach has become a novel strategy for the treatment of scars. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of dual-mode Er:YAG laser delivering pulses either with and without heat/coagulation in a cohort of patients with long keloid/hypertrophic scars. The main hypothesis is that ablative fractional laser without heat/coagulation is equivalent to laser with heat/coagulation in terms of scars volume reduction, while the secondary hypothesis is that ablative fractional laser without heat/coagulation is superior in terms of post-operative erythema and hypopigmentation reduction.

This research study will evaluate the effectiveness of high dose UVB light therapy in the treatment of keloid (or hypertrophic scar), scleroderma, acne keloidalis nuchae, old burn scars, granuloma annulare or related conditions.