search

Active clinical trials for "Kidney Diseases"

Results 391-400 of 3857

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Hantaan Virus DNA Vaccine and a Puumala Virus DNA Vaccine, For The...

Hantaan Virus NephropathyPuumala Virus Nephropathy

A randomized 4 cohort study that is comparing the data collected during the earlier phase study and to determine if immunogenicity can be retained with a 1 mg dose of Hantaan DNA vaccine.

Recruiting45 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Non-Invasive Continuous vs Intermittent BloodPressure Monitors in Maintenance Dialysis...

End Stage Renal DiseaseEnd Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis2 more

Prospective, single center, open label, non-randomized, post-market study of the Tablo Hemodialysis System and VitalStream Monitor in participants with End-Stage KidneyDisease undergoing In-Center Hemodialysis.

Recruiting5 enrollment criteria

Explore the Effectors of The Transtheoretical Model on Nutritional Education in Patients on Hemodialysis...

End-Stage Kidney DiseaseHyperphosphatemia

The purpose of this study is to assess the improvement degree of nutritional care program on the nutritional status and eating habits of hemodialysis patients

Recruiting6 enrollment criteria

Symptom Management in Patients on Dialysis

End-stage Kidney Disease

This is a parallel arm, pilot study used to examine the feasibility of electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) for symptom assessment and monitoring as well as a linked self-management support and decision support information hub (https://symptomcare.org) to facilitate symptom management for patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Two dialysis centers will be included in the study, with one center receiving SUPPORT-Dialysis (intervention arm) and the other receiving standard care (control arm).

Recruiting6 enrollment criteria

Multiparametric MRI in Healthy Volunteers and CKD Patients

Chronic Kidney DiseasesHealthy

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health concern because more than 10% of the world's population have it, its prevalence is increasing, and CKD is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality for this population. The majority of the people with CKD aren't aware and there are not available tools for early CKD detection and for an accurate prediction on these patients. Many CKD patients exhibit progressive renal dysfunction, demonstrating a failure of current, non-specific therapeutic strategies. Better methods are urgently needed for i) early diagnosis of CKD, and prediction of its progression for improved stratification of patients and better targeting of current treatments; and ii) to directly assess structural and functional responses of the kidney to new therapies and identify those patients who respond. Over the past decade, renal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has emerged as a promising technique for improved understanding and characterisation of renal pathophysiology. Compared to histopathology, MRI is non-invasive and avoids sampling bias by characterising the entire kidney with high spatial resolution. In spite of a number of single centre studies showing renal MRI feasibility and potential to address a number of key clinical questions, current methodological differences across studies hinder reliable comparisons of the results, which can only be regarded as preliminary. Standardization of acquisition and processing protocols across centres is therefore needed, and this will also lead to the possibility to provide preliminary data of the multiparametric renal MRI clinical validity and utility. The purpose of this study is to standardize, assess the feasibility and provide preliminary evidence of clinical validity and utility of the multiparametric renal MRI. To reach this goal two groups of subjects are involved: Group 1 (healthy volunteers). In this group the repeatibility and reproducibility of multiparametric renal MRI will be assessed. Group 2 (CKD patients). In this group the feasibility, the acceptability, the reproducibility and the preliminary clinical validity of multiparametric renal MRI will be assessed.

Recruiting26 enrollment criteria

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Contrast Exposure: VQ vs. CT

Acute Kidney InjuryPulmonary Embolism1 more

Both, CT scans and VQ scans, are used by doctors to look for pulmonary embolism. The most common reason to order a VQ scan is to avoid the IV dye. The IV dye used for CT scans can cause kidney problems in some patients, called contrast-induced nephropathy or "CIN." This is a kidney problem that usually does not make patients feel any differently or change how they urinate. Most of the time, it can only be found by testing blood several days later. This kind of kidney problem can be very mild and some patients will never have any symptoms, rarely these problems can be severe. Some patients can also have similar kidney problems for many other reasons (reactions to medications, blood pressure problems, etc.) and can even happen in patients that do not get IV dye. That is why doctors are not sure exactly who will have these problems or if using a test that does not use IV dye can prevent this kidney problem. The VQ scan uses a different medication through the IV that is not IV dye and has not been linked to kidney problems. The purpose of this study is to learn if using the test that does not use IV dye (the "VQ scan") instead of a CT scan in some patients can help to prevent kidney problems.

Recruiting11 enrollment criteria

Concordance Between Central Blood PRessure dEvices In Nephrology Patients

HypertensionChronic Kidney Disease1 more

The most accurate way to determine intra-aortic BP is to obtain invasive measures by vascular catheterization, which is not possible to perform routinely during the regular follow-up of patients. However, in recent years, devices used to estimate central BP have been designed and approved for clinical use. These devices can determine aortic BP in a non-invasive way using various techniques and algorithms and offer a high degree of precision when compared to invasive measurements of intraaortic BP. On the other hand, certain characteristics specific to the different devices mean that the central BP values obtained may not be interchangeable. It is therefore important to determine the degree of agreement of central BP values obtained using commercially available devices. This study aims to determine the degree of agreement between central BP measurements obtained using 4 devices commonly used to measure central blood pressure, i.e. Mobil-o-Graph NG (IEM, Germany), WatchBP Office (Microlife, Taiwan), Oscar 2 with SphygmoCor inside (SunTech, USA) and BP+ (Uscom, Australia). These four devices record the shape of the pulsatile wave and then derive the central BP using an algorithm. The main differences between these devices lie in this algorithm, or "transfer function,", which is unique to each and the calibration used. All use a brachial cuff to capture the pulse waveform and can easily be used in clinical practice.

Recruiting4 enrollment criteria

The Validity of the Quick Renal MRI in Pediatric Kidney Disease

PyelonephritisPyelonephritis Acute1 more

The investigators propose a new imaging method for children born with congenital anomalies of the urinary tract that is a rapid, injection-, sedation-, and radiation-free alternative: the quick renal MRI. This proposal hypothesizes that the quick renal MRI has high validity compared to current radiologic standard for renal infection and scarring, the 99mTechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid (99mTc- DMSA) renal scan in the detection of acute renal infections and scars. If the quick renal MRI is accurate, it could potentially replace the DMSA scan for those specific questions and ease the burden of testing for children with chronic renal disease. Findings from these studies will provide preliminary data and rationale for a multi-centered study to further test this new technology. Participants will be 0-21 years of age and can expect to be on study for from 1 week (if enrolled in Aim 1) to 6 months (if enrolled in Aim 2).

Recruiting12 enrollment criteria

PREvention of CardIovascular and DiabEtic kidNey Disease in Type 2 Diabetes

Type2DiabetesASCVD

PRECIDENTD is a randomized, open label, pragmatic clinical trial designed to compare rates of the total number of cardiovascular, kidney, and death events among three alternative treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and either established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or at high risk for ASCVD. To accomplish this objective, we will randomly assign 9,000 patients with established T2D and ASCVD or high-risk for ASCVD in a 1:1:1 allocation to SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, or the combination. Participants will be followed for the occurrence of the trial primary endpoint of the total (first and recurrent) number of episodes of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure, development of end-stage kidney disease, kidney transplantation, and mortality, counting all events from randomization until end of study.

Recruiting17 enrollment criteria

Stem Cells for Uremic Calciphylaxis Patients

Chronic Kidney DiseasesCalciphylaxis2 more

Treatment for Uremic Calciphylaxis Patients with Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Active8 enrollment criteria
1...394041...386

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs