Efficacy of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation in Combination With Metallic Biliary Stenting in...
Hilar CholangiocarcinomaBiliary ObstructionThe study aim to evaluate the efficacy of intraductal radiofrequency ablation for unresetable hilar cholangiocarcinoma in addition to biliary stenting. The patient would be randomized into 1:1 ratio of conventional group who received biliary stenting alone, and RFA group who receive intraductal RFA before biliary stenting. Immediate complications as well as long term stent patency and patient survival would be studied.
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Unresectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Klatskin TumorRationale: For patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, surgery is the only treatment modality that can result in cure. Unfortunately, in the majority of these patients the tumors are found to be unresectable at presentation due to local invasive tumor growth or the presence of distal metastases. For patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma palliative chemotherapy is the standard treatment yielding an estimated median overall survival of 12-15.2 months. There is no evidence from randomized trials that support the routine use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for cholangiocarcinoma. However, small and most often retrospective studies combining chemotherapy with SBRT showed promising results with overall survival reaching up to 33-35 months. Based upon these observations, the investigators designed a local feasibility trial with SBRT after chemotherapy in patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in order to try to confirm the observed tolerability of adding SBRT to standard chemotherapy. The expected time to include the required patients for this pilot study will be one year. Objective: To assess feasibility of SBRT as add on treatment after standard chemotherapy. Study design: Local feasibility trial. Study population: Patients diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 18 years of age or older, T1-4 N0-1 M0 (AJCC 7th Edition), after completion of standard chemotherapy. Exclusion criteria are local tumor growth into either stomach, colon, duodenum, pancreas or abdominal wall. Sample size will be 6 patients. Intervention: SBRT will be delivered in 15 fractions of 3 to 4.5Gy after 8 cycles of chemotherapy. In case of toxicity causing premature termination of systemic treatment, the patient can still proceed to SBRT. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint of this study is feasibility measured by radiotherapy induced toxicity according to CTC v4.0.3. Secondary endpoints will be: Quality of life Local progression Progression free survival Overall survival Cellular radiosensitivity.
Trametinib or Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Refractory or Advanced Biliary...
Adult CholangiocarcinomaAdvanced Adult Hepatocellular Carcinoma17 moreThis randomized phase II trial studies how well trametinib or combination chemotherapy works in treating patients with refractory or advanced biliary or gallbladder cancer or that cannot be removed by surgery. Trametinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, and capecitabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving trametinib is more effective than combination chemotherapy in treating patients with biliary or gallbladder cancer.
Best Biliary Drainage Option in Advanced Klatskin Tumor
CholangitisTo investigate the biliary drainage-related cholangitis and other complications of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in the management of Klatskin tumor (KT) compared with endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD).
Ricolinostat, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, and Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Unresectable or...
Non-Resectable CholangiocarcinomaRecurrent Cholangiocarcinoma11 moreThis phase Ib trial studies the side effects and best dose of ricolinostat when given together with gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin in treating patients with cholangiocarcinoma that cannot be removed by surgery or has spread to other places in the body. Ricolinostat may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving ricolinostat together with gemcitabine hydrochloride and cisplatin may work better in treating patients with cholangiocarcinoma that cannot be removed by surgery or has spread to other places.
Application of Endoscopic Scissors Cutting ENBD Tube in the Treatment of Malignant Hilar Biliary...
Endoscopic Retrograde CholangiopancreatographyKlatskin TumorThe purpose of this study is to evaluate application value of the endoscopic cutting technique in the treatment of malignant hilar biliary strictures.
Surgical Treatment of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Minor or Major Liver Resection?
CholangiocarcinomaSurgical Treatment1 moreThe investigators conducted a prospective study to determine the safety and efficacy of minor and major hepatectomy selected by predetermined criteria in 138 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. In selected patients, minor liver resection was a good treatment.
Superior Bilioenteric Anastomosis by Magnetic Compressive Technique
Hilar CholangiocarcinomaBile Duct Injury2 moreThe purpose of this study is to determine whether the magnetic compressive anastomosis has a better outcomes than traditional manual anastomosis on superior bilioenteric anastomosis.
REMS Combined With TAI for Unresectable HC
Unresectable Hilar CholangiocarcinomaThe purpose of this randomized controlled study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Radiation-Emitting Metallic Stents (REMS) combined with Trans-Arterial Infusion (TAI) for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Uncovered Self-expandable Metal Stent Versus Double Layer Plastic Stent for Malignant Hilar Stricture...
Bile Duct ObstructionKlatskin's TumorThe overall median survival of nonresectable malignant hilar obstruction in most series has been less than 6 months. Most patients with malignant hilar obstruction present with advanced disease, making palliative endoscopic drainage the principal therapeutic option. However, the optimal endoscopic management strategy is contentious. Almost all of the published data comparing plastic and metallic stents relate to distal tumors (those of the pancreas, common bile duct and ampulla). Stent patency, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness have favored metallic stents when compared with plastic stents in patients with distal malignant obstruction expected to live at least 3 to 6 months. There are few comparative study as to whether self-expanding metallic or plastic stent, especially DLS (double layer plastic stent) are preferable in the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness for palliating malignant hilar obstruction. The study was designed to compare the the technical success, stent patency, and cost-effectiveness of self-expandable metal stent and DLS in patients with malignant hilar obstruction.