Active clinical trials for "Leg Length Inequality"

This is a randomized clinical trial of epiphysiodesis techniques: percutaneous transphyseal screw epiphysiodesis versus percutaneous drill epiphysiodesis for the correction of leg length discrepancy. Failed epiphysiodesis was selected as the primary outcome. Failed epiphysiodesis was defined as one or more of the following: development of angular deformity > 5°, revision epiphysiodesis, or growth inhibition < 70% of expected. EOS, low dose biplanar X-Ray, will be used to make all length measurements. Secondary outcomes assess mean growth at the physis following epiphysiodesis, in the subset of patients with bead implantation, fluoroscopy and operative times, length of stay, return to full weight bearing, as well as functional and quality of life outcomes. The following outcome scales will be used to measure pain (VAS), quality of life (PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Scale), and function (PROMIS Pediatric Mobility Scale, Pedi-FABS, and UCLA Activity Score). Each of these scales has been validated for use in children (Beyer, Denyes, & Villarruel, 1992; DeWitt et al., 2011; Fabricant et al., 2013; Novais et al., 2014; Varni et al., 2010a). We will also determine the cost associated with each technique and perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to establish which technique is preferred from a societal perspective.

There are numerous ways to measure limb length discrepancy in the clinical practice, although their reliability and accuracy are not well known. In our prospective diagnostic study we aimed to test the most popular methods and compare their results to EOS 3D reconstructions data.

SYNOSTE Nitinail System Trial is an international multicenter open label single-arm equivalence study to verify whether the leg-lengthening procedure can be adequately controlled with the SNS system as measured with the lengthening control index (LCI) at the end of the distraction period.

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder. A variety of exercise interventions which were designed as randomized control trails (RCTs) have been studied and shown effectiveness in improving pain and disability. These exercises typically focus on the abdominal and back musculature strength. However, many LBP patients did not show any improvement in their symptom after they carry out those exercise programs.

Limb-length discrepancy can be due to many causes. These are divided into three groups: congenital (from birth), developmental (from a childhood disease or injury that slows or damages the growth plates), and posttraumatic (from a fracture that leads to shortening of the bone ends). There are three ways to equalize the limb-length discrepancy: use a shoe lift, shorten the long leg, lengthen the short leg. Most patients do not like wearing a lift greater than 2 cm (3/4 in). For discrepancies greater than 2 cm but less than 5 cm (2 in), shortening of the long leg can be considered, especially for tall persons. For growing children, this can be easily accomplished with a small, minimally invasive, uncomplicated procedure called epiphysiodesis.The investigators aim to evaluate if injection of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells can shorten the treatment period by acceleration of bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Measuring spine dynamics is a necessity in order to better understand gait deviations throughout the whole body and to evaluate treatment effects on spinal movement during gait. However, the full body marker sets that are typically used in opto-electronic 3D gait analyses either disregard the spine entirely or regard it as a rigid structure. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use an enhanced trunk marker set in order to evaluate the biomechanical effects of lower extremity treatments on spine dynamics in patients with different pathologies. It has been hypothesized that the enhanced trunk marker set is a reliable method for the measurement of spine dynamics during gait in patients with deviations occurring secondary to leg length inequality. the enhanced trunk marker set is a reliable method for the measurement of spine dynamics during gait in patients that present both primary and secondary deviations such as seen in hemiplegic and diplegic cerebral palsy. treatment by means of either a shoe insole or a modified shoe with sole lift on the shorter side has an effect on spine dynamics during gait in patients with leg length inequality. treatment by means of an ankle foot orthosis to control the foot position has an effect on spine dynamics during gait in patients with hemiplegic and diplegic cerebral palsy. To verify the hypotheses, instrumented gait analyses with a standard full body marker set and the enhanced trunk marker set will be carried out before and immediately after an orthotic lower extremity treatment in the respective patient group.

Back pain is a huge problem for millions of Americans, including nearly 11 million Veterans. Our older Veterans suffer the most. Citizens spend billions of dollars, yet consistently get poor results. Primary Care Providers are often tasked with diagnosing and treating Chronic Low Back Pain, even though they are often undereducated in the field. These PCPs often use advanced imaging, usually MRIs to guide care. These images often show degenerative disc disease and other common pathologies in older adults, even those who are pain free, which can lead to misdiagnosis and treatment. The investigators believe that Chronic Low Back Pain is a syndrome, a final common pathway for the expression of multiple contributors that often lie outside the spine itself. For example, hip osteoarthritis, knee pain, and even anxiety could all lessen back pain if addressed and treated probably. Investigators will measure participants' low back pain-associated disability with the well-validated RMDQ. Data will be collected at baseline and monthly via telephone. The investigators hypothesize that veterans who receive PCCET will experience significantly greater reduction in low back pain-associated disability than those who receive IAUC at six months. Investigators will also measure participants' low back pain with the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale for Pain. Data will be collected at baseline and monthly via telephone. The investigators hypothesize that veterans who receive PCCET will experience significantly greater reduction in low back pain than those who receive IAUC at six months. The goal of this study is to compare patients treated with usual care, which usually starts with imaging, versus patients who are treated by trained geriatricians who know how to recognize and address 11 key conditions that commonly drive pain and disability in older adults. The investigators believe that older patients who receive care tailored to their needs by educated PCPs will ultimately have less back pain and, more importantly, better quality of life.

People with anatomical leg length discrepancy (LLD) commonly presented excessive subtalar pronation of the long leg compared to their short leg in order to equalize leg length. Although such compensation may decrease the stress in the pelvis and/or low back region, the pronated foot may lead to excessive stress loading onto the ankle or foot, resulting in musculoskeletal injuries. Clinically, the pronated foot has been effectively controlled using functional orthoses with proper posting by adjusting the subtalar joint in the neutral position. But for people with compensatory pronated foot resulted from anatomical LLD, to control excessive pronation of the long leg would exaggerate their asymmetry in leg length. Instead, the pronated foot can be controlled simply by adjusting the length of the short leg. However, there is limited evidence of such intervention in previous literature. The purpose of this research project is going to determine the effect of leg length adjustment on pronation control in people with anatomical LLD. According to this purpose, 5 study objectives will be developed: 1) to examine the validity and reliability of LLD measurement using a hand-held laser distance meter, 2) to compare the foot types before and after leg length adjustment, 3) to compare the kinetic variables before and after leg length adjustment during quiet stance, 4) to compare the kinetic variables before and after leg length adjustment during level walking, and 5) to compare symptoms and functional levels related to low back pain (LBP) before and after leg length adjustment. The present research project will be designed as a convenience sampling, prospective, quasi-experimental, and pretest/posttest design. There will be 2 parts in this research: 1) validity and reliability test of laser measure for leg length and 2) foot morphology and kinetic analysis before and after leg length adjustment. For the first part of this research, 10 male adults and 20 adults will be recruited for the validity and reliability tests respectively. Anthropometric measurements, including body height, body weight, foot length, foot width, and heel-ball distance, will be measured after a consent form is signed. Participants of the validity test will receive standing pelvic radiography and laser measure to measure their leg length. Each participant of the reliability test will receive 2 sessions of laser measure using a hand-held laser-distance meter. For the first session, all laser measurements will be employed twice by 2 raters with a rest interval of more than 5 min. One week later, another session of laser measure will be given again by one of these 2 raters. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) will be used to test the interrater reliability, intrarater reliability, and validity of the laser measure method. Standard error of measurement (SEM), and small real difference (SRD) will be calculated to represented intrarater reliability also. For the second part of the research, another thirty adults with compensatory pronated foot resulted from LLD will be included in the research project but the sample size will be adjusted to the appropriate number according to power analysis. Each participant will be asked to fill out the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and receive tests containing foot type examination, quiet stance with eye opening, quiet stance with eye closed, and level walking. All tests will be performed before and after leg length adjustment. The experiment will be completed after collecting 3 successful trials for each test. All procedures will be done one month later. ANOVA with repeated measures will be calculated to compare the differences in these variables among before, immediately after, and 1 month following leg length adjustment when the data fit the assumptions of normal distribution. Discrete variables or variables with non-normal distribution were tested using the Friedman test. All statistical analyses will be calculated using SAS 9.1.3. The significant level was set at α = 0.05 while the power was at 0.8. Five possible results may be expected from conducting this research project: 1) there will be good validity and reliability of the laser distance meter to measure LLD, 2) there will be significant differences in measurements of foot type before and after leg length adjustment, 3) there will be significant differences in kinetic data during quiet stance before and after leg length adjustment, 4) there will be significant differences in kinetic data during level walking before and after leg length adjustment, and 5) symptom and functional level related to LBP will improve after leg length adjustment. Completion of this research project will be projected to provide solid and objective evidences for leg length adjustment through views of morphology and kinetics in people with pronated foot due to anatomical LLD.

Limb length inequality is when a person has one leg that is longer than the other. This research will look at correcting limb length inequality in adults with knee or hip symptoms. This study will examine whether ways of measuring leg length inequality in the clinic are valid and reliable, determine whether foot posture (flat foot, normal, and high arch) is related to leg length inequality, and determine whether shoe lifts are a helpful treatment for leg length inequality and knee/hip symptoms.

Moving one's joints through their full range of motion (ROM) is crucial for health and wellbeing. Those who are unable to do so have difficulty carrying out simple activities like walking or feeding themselves. Lost joint ROM is called a contracture. Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis. About a third of people with knee OA develop knee flexion contractures (KFlCs), the inability to fully straighten the knee. Having a KFlC before a knee replacement is a big risk factor for redeveloping one after the operation. Many people with a KFlC in the knee for surgery also have a KFlC in the other knee. The investigators believe that this non-surgical KFlC increases the risk of re-developing a KFlC in the surgical knee after surgery by encouraging bending of the surgical knee to avoid one leg being shorter than the other. No one has ever looked at whether fixing this leg length difference using a shoe lift would prevent this problem and there is little information to help design such a study. Here the investigators will see if testing shoe lift use for preventing KFlC is feasible. The investigators hypothesis is that a study evaluating the benefit of using a shoe lift to correct leg length difference in the non-surgical knee is feasible.