Active clinical trials for "Leg Ulcer"

Ulcers of the lower limbs are a major public health problem whose management needs to be further improved, particularly in terms of healing time, prevalence and recurrence rate. Ulcers of venous origin, or mixed arteriovenous and predominantly venous, represent the majority of leg ulcers with an estimated proportion of 70 to 80% of cases. These are painful, disabling conditions that are difficult to treat in a lasting way. This study focuses on a treatment strategy with endovascular glue. The advantage of treating ulcers with cyanoacrylate glue is the possibility of occluding the great saphenous vein over its entire length, freeing itself from neurological complications secondary to endovenous thermal techniques (laser, radiofrequency), as well as the possibility of treating by direct puncture any perforators or tributaries feeding the ulcer. This treatment strategy would improve the healing process for a lasting resolution of this pathology. This study aims to describe the feasibility and tolerance of this type of treatment in the resolution of varicose ulcers.

Leg ulcers are defined as wounds lasting for more than a month. They would receive 0.2% of the population of Western countries. In Europe, the cost per episode of leg ulcers is estimated at 6650 euros (10 000 euros for a foot ulcer). The cost of treatment of wounds would be 2 to 4% of the health budget. Infection is the most common complication of chronic wounds: in most cases, it results in delayed healing, at most, it can result in amputation or serious general complications Bacterial contamination of ulcers is constant. Over time for over 25 years, various studies have shown about relatively identical results. The bacteria are present in over 90% of the etiology of venous leg ulcers. These bacteria are divided into four most common classes: Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas. The bacterial ecology changes over time. Indeed Staphylococcus aureus appears first, while the Pseudomonas is associated with ulcers lasting for several months. Anaerobic more difficult to find, are found in 30% of cases Cohabitation between leg ulcers and bacteria often without clinical consequence: These are the stages of infection and colonization. The infection is related to the proliferation of bacteria and their invasion into the skin, by increasing their virulence (virulence genes acquisition). The increase in the number of bacteria and the multiplicity of bacterial genera are one reason for the increased virulence of bacteria. When bacteria proliferate, because the host defenses are inadequate, or because there is a vascular disease which promotes the proliferation, clinical signs appear

The cornerstone of the management of venous leg or predominantly venous leg ulcers with IPS> 0.8 is venous compression as recommended by the HAS in June 2006. There is ample clinical evidence to support its importance to improve the chances of closure of this chronic lesion and shorten the healing time compared to the absence of compression. In 2016, a system of re-usable compression stockings (Venotrain® Ulcertec, BAUERFEIND, France), and bringing an interface pressure of 30 to 45 mmHg to the ankle according to the prescription, was taken over by the Health Insurance in France. 'Indication' Ulcer of venous origin or predominantly venous component, stage C6 CEAP classification with a systolic pressure index greater than 0.9 '. The investigators propose to study the efficiency of Venotrain® Ulcertec in a diverse population in which it is prescribed according to the usual practices of venous leg ulceration of venous or predominantly venous origin.

This Study aims to identify whether venous leg ulcers which are colonised by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa cause more pain than those which are not and if this bacteria affects healing time. This may determine how venous ulcer infections are treated in order to improve symtomatology and quality of life for patients with these chronic wounds.

This is a post - market study with a wound dressing, a CE-marked medical device available on the european market. The device will be used in routine clinical practice, i.e. within its intended purpose and without any additional invasive or stressing examinations for the patients. Up to 36 adult patients with wounds suitable to be treated with the medical device and meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled at two participating German sites. During 5 on-site visits within 28 days routine weekly dressing changes the Health Care Professional will examine the wound and will perform required wound care and dressing changes. Pictures of the wound with and without dressing will be taken at each visit and used for automatic analysis. The subjects will be asked to rate their general wound pain and the pain perceived during dressing changes. A wound-related quality of life questionnaire will be presented to the subjects twice and the subject and HCP will rate their safisfaction with the product.

This is a single-arm, observational, multicenter PMCF investigation designed to confirm clinical performance and safety of ChloraSolv when exposed to larger population of clinical users. Approximately 65 subjects will be enrolled (calculated dropout range 20%) from at least 6-12 sites in Sweden. Subjects presented with chronic leg ulcers and chronic diabetic foot ulcers in need of debridement will be enrolled and receive application of ChloraSolv per clinical routine at treating site and in accordance with the ChloraSolv Instruction for Use for up to 24 weeks. Subjects will attend a baseline visit to assess eligibility and collect demographic and baseline data and initiate treatment. There will be two follow up visits in the investigation. The first follow up visit will take place at End of Treatment, as based on investigator judgement and clinical routine at the treating site, maximum 24 weeks post baseline per the IFU. After End of Treatment, subjects will continue in the investigation with wound management per clinical routine at the treating sites for 6 weeks. At 6 weeks post End of Treatment, subjects will attend a Follow-up visit to assess safety, wound status and relative change in wound size. Besides confirmation of the clinical performance and safety when used in a larger population the investigation also includes analysis of treatment period duration. Additionally, health economy parameters will be analyzed. The investigation will be monitored to confirm the already known precautions as well as identify new precautions and possible contraindications for the use of the device. Photography of the wound pre and post debridement will be performed to confirm wound size and amount of devitalized tissue in the wound.

The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of a low-power PEMF device, a medium-power PEMF device and a high-power PEMF device as compared to a sham device to treat leg ulcers resulting from venous stasis ("VSLU").

The aim of this post market clinical follow up (PMCF) study is to confirm the performance of Suprasorb® A + Ag wound dressing and rope, to collect safety data regarding expected adverse events and to detect potential unexpected adverse events associated with use of Suprasorb® A + Ag wound dressing and rope within the certified indications and under the conditions of routine use.

The geko™ Cross Therapy REGISTRY - Wound is a prospective, observational, anonymised data collection Registry with no experimental treatment that will fulfil an unmet need for an observational Registry to provide long-term clinical data to demonstrate patient benefit and regulatory compliance.

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of a daily geko™ wound therapy (duration of 12 hours), in conjunction with standard of care (SC), to SC alone, in participants with venous leg ulcers.The participants will go through a four-week run-in phase, followed by a four-week treatment phase and a three-month long term follow-up.