Active clinical trials for "Low Back Pain"

The objective of this study will be to identify the short-term impact of positive, neutral, or negative speech on pain intensity (primary outcome). The secondary outcomes assessed will be the global perceived effect of improvement, patient's expectations regarding spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) intervention, and perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This study will enroll 60 participants with CLBP aged between 18 and 60 years. This is an exploratory randomized clinical trial. The three groups will receive a manual therapy session after watching the video proposed for their group. First participants will be assessed for pain intensity, low back pain disability, psychosocial aspects, and expectations related to treatment. Secondly, a researcher not involved in the recruitment of patients will randomly allocate the participants into three different groups (G1- group submitted to positive expectation, G2- group submitted to neutral expectation, and G3- group submitted to negative expectation). After the allocation, the participants will watch a short video (no more than 3 minutes) delivering positive, negative, or neutral messages regarding SMT. And finally, a physiotherapist will administer one session of SMT and participants will be re-assessed to investigate the immediate effect of the videos on the pain intensity, global perceived effect of improvement, and expectations. Ultimately, patients will be submitted to a semi-structured interview in which their perceptions about the videos will be investigated. Outcomes will be assessed just immediately after one SMT session.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of a new digital therapy for managing chronic low back pain in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the digital therapy improve back function and reduce pain intensity in participants with chronic low back pain? How does the digital therapy's impact compare to traditional exercise therapy? Participants in this study will be asked to use the digital therapy app on their smartphones. They will receive guided core stability exercises through the app and will be encouraged to perform these exercises at home. Researchers will assess participants' progress by monitoring their exercise adherence and tracking changes in their back function and pain intensity over time. To compare the effects of the digital therapy, some participants will follow a traditional exercise therapy program guided by a physical therapist. Researchers will compare the outcomes of these two groups to determine whether the digital therapy is as effective as traditional therapy in improving back function and reducing pain intensity in individuals with chronic low back pain.

The purpose of the current study is to determine the effect of myofascial release of plantar fascia on pain, back function, lumbar flexibility and pain pressure threshold for patients with CNSLBP.

Neural mobilization is a technique that plays an important role in repairing the neural tissue's ability to respond to stress or tension by triggering the reconstruction of normal physiological functioning, pain reduction, and functional improvement. The study aims to examine the effect of the sciatic nerve slider technique in different positions and which of the most common positions is more effective in the application of neural mobilization in low back pain with sciatica.

The goal of this observational trial is to compare the health history and motion capabilities of participants with low back pain disorders to participants with healthy spines. The main question[s] it aims to answer are to: Primary outcomes of this research effort include composite measures that differentiate between control and patient populations, predict injury or reinjury risk, identify low back and neck pain patient phenotypes, and evaluate treatment effectiveness. Secondary outcomes of this research effort include an assessment of wearable motion sensor accuracy, characterization of motion assessment utility, biopsychosocial profiling of control and low back and neck pain patient populations, and differentiation of sincere and insincere motion assessment efforts. Participants will complete questionnaires and wear a motion monitor that will assess your back and/or neck. This session will be approximately 40-70 minutes. The research team will follow up with participants at 3 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years to complete a short series of questionnaires and a motion assessment test.

Low back pain is a significant public health problem, is very prevalent, and is often characterized by the persistence of symptoms. Unfortunately, substantial improvements in people with chronic low back pain are rare, causing most people to live with the pain. People with chronic low back pain may have an exaggerated pain response to nociceptive input into tissues that are may also cause symptoms distant from the site of the primary symptoms. Historically, these symptoms were thought to be related to pathoanatomic changes to the muscles, ligaments or joints. However, the severity of these structural changes weakly correlates with the clinical presentation and in most cases, is not directly related to diagnostic images findings. Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in general, show signs of local/central sensitization. The central sensitization may appear to be directly correlated with the intensity and duration of pain. Therefore, it is essential to reduce pain intensity and minimize the duration of pain to prevent this from happening. Pain relief for chronic low back pain patients should be aimed at treatments that reduce central excitability and increase central inhibition. Research into chronic low back pain treatment has demonstrated strong evidence that different types of exercise decrease pain and improve quality of life. However, exercise itself may be painful, and the pain may prevent a person from exercising. Thus, treatments aimed at decreasing pain will improve a person's ability to exercise and participate in activities of daily living. One treatment aimed at reducing central excitability and increasing central inhibition is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a "non-pharmacological" treatment for pain that is inexpensive, safe, and easy to use. Prior studies show that TENS utilizes opioid receptors both spinally and supraspinally to inhibit nociceptive dorsal horn neurons, reduce excitatory neurotransmitter release and reduce hyperalgesia. Thus, TENS may be particularly useful in people with chronic low back pain for its ability to activate descending inhibitory pathways (reduced in chronic low back pain patients) and to inhibit central excitability (increased in chronic low back pain patients). Previous studies that have investigated the effects of TENS on pain in low back pain patients have failed to use proper intensities of current, and the assessment of pain was not performed during the peak of the analgesic response. Previous studies show that inadequate intensities do not reduce pain or increase pressure pain thresholds. Further, TENS typically does not affect resting pain, while changes in pressure pain thresholds and pain with movement are reduced. Thus, the current study proposes to assess the effects of TENS on measures of pain, function, and descending inhibition using the maximal tolerable intensity of TENS applied to a large area of the trunk.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of a digital behavioral therapy for insomnia (dBTi) in people with chronic low back pain and insomnia. The main question it aims to answer is whether a 3 week period of dBTi can improve pain-related interference 6 weeks from commencement. Researchers will compare the treatment (dBTi) to an active control (Sleep health education modules) to see if there is a significant difference in outcomes at baseline and end-of-study (6 weeks).

A consistent theme in the modern-day healthcare system is the difficulty of transferring research knowledge into clinical practice. Recently, it has been pointed out that this is a barrier for providing care that is evidence-based which may partly explain the growing burden of low back pain. Low back pain, as all other musculoskeletal pain conditions is multidimensional where biomedical and psychological factors need to be accounted for, as well as the patient's social context. From the healthcare provider perspective, this requires skills that often goes beyond the basic training where clinicians need to be able to assess and manage the multiple domains in a patient-centered manner. In Denmark, people living with disabling low back pain can be referred to a municipality-based rehabilitation program. This study seeks to investigate whether providing physiotherapists an evidence-based educational course on the management of low back pain will change patient-related outcomes. Likewise, we will investigate potential barriers and facilitators for implementing the skills the physiotherapists acquire in clinical practice. If the project shows a favorable effect, it will allow for upscaling the intervention within and across municipalities. Moreover, a positive outcome may provide indications of what type of continuing education resources should be made available to help clinicians better manage complicated low back pain problems.

The goals of this observational study are: To determine the validity and reliability of the OPTIMAL-confidence scale in people with chronic low back pain. To assess the influence of confidence and fear of movement on the evolution of low back pain. The main question it aims to answer is if people with chronic low back pain present different psychoemotional variables around fear of movement and decreased confidence in their ability to perform movement that may influence their low back pain. For this purpose, a two-phase study was designed. In the first phase, the OPTIMAL-confidence scale will be validated in patients with chronic low back pain, determining its internal consistency and validity. In the second phase, a prospective study will be carried out with patients with low back pain who attend physiotherapy centres to determine how confidence and fear of movement influence the characteristics of pain and its evolution. Data will be collected at the beginning of the physiotherapy treatment, at the end of the treatment and after three months. The data will be analysed using learning machine techniques.

To study the effect of adding selected G Med muscle strengthening exercises to the APTA-guided program on pain, disability level, and G Med macromorphology in patients with NSCLBP.