Active clinical trials for "Lymphoma"

RATIONALE: Radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies, such as iodine I 131 tositumomab and yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan, can find cancer cells and carry cancer-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. This may be an effective treatment for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying the side effects, best dose, and how well iodine I 131 tositumomab or yttrium Y 90 ibritumomab tiuxetan works in treating patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

This is a multi-center study for the long-term follow-up of surviving patients who are expected to complete or who have completed at least two years of follow-up after treatment with Iodine I 131 Tositumomab (BEXXAR) on Studies CP-97-011, CP-98-025, CP-99-032, or CP-99-036. All patients will be assessed for survival and disease status, including subsequent therapy for NHL, and for long-term safety. Additionally Laboratory evaluations consisting of a TSH level and a complete blood cell (CBC) count with a differential and platelet count will be obtained annually. Additionally, patients who remain in long-term response following Iodine I 131 Tositumomab treatment will be followed for response and progression.

This is a study for the long-term follow-up of patients who completed at least two years of follow-up after treatment with Tositumomab and/or Iodine I 131 Tositumomab (BEXXAR)on Study RIT-I-000, RIT-II-001, RIT-II-002, RIT-II-004 or CP-97-012. All patients will be assessed for survival and disease status, including subsequent therapy for NHL, and for long term safety. Laboratory evaluations consisting of a TSH level (for all patients) and a complete blood cell (CBC) count with a differential and platelet count (for patients in continuing response only) will be obtained annually through Year 10 post treatment with Tositumomab and/or Iodine I 131 Tositumomab. Patients that remain in response to their previous treatment with BEXXAR, will additionally be followed radiographically for response and progression.

RATIONALE: Questionnaires that measure quality-of-life may improve the health care team's ability to plan supportive care for patients undergoing donor bone marrow transplantation. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying quality of life in patients who are undergoing donor bone marrow transplantation.

RATIONALE: Studying quality of life in cancer survivors may help determine the long-term effects of hematologic cancer and may help improve the quality of life for future cancer survivors. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying the quality of life of adult cancer survivors who have undergone a previous bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplant for a childhood hematologic cancer.

RATIONALE: Diagnostic imaging procedures using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies may improve the ability to detect and stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PURPOSE: Phase III trial to study the effectiveness of a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody in the detection and staging of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

This study is designed to monitor all patients exposed to CD19 CAR-T expressing IL7 and CCL19 for 5 years following infusion, to assess their long-term efficacy, including the CAR-vector persistence, the normal immunity rebuilding and the risk of delayed adverse events (AEs).

This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and its additional value to the International Prognostic Index (IPI).

Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is a malignant, aggressive lymphoid cancer. The incidence in Denmark is approximately 450 cases per year. In 2/3 of the cases, complete remission is achieved with immunochemotherapy. The remaining 30% will experience relapse and in 5 % of the patients, this will occur in the central nervous system (CNS). CNS relapse has a very poor prognosis with an overall survival of 3-6 months. In order to identify patients at risk of CNS relapse, the CNS-IPI score is used to stratify the patients into three risk groups according to number of risk factors (low 0-1, middle 2-3 and high risk 4-6 which corresponds to 2-year CNS relapse rates of 0,6%, 3,4% and 10,2% respectively). DLBCL can be subdivided by gene expression analysis into three different types based on the cell of origin (ie the stage of the equivalent normal cell development from which the disease arises): the germinal center B-cell (GCB)-like subtype, the activated B-cell (ABC)-like subtype and unclassifiable. The subdivision is of prognostic importance as patients with GCB-like subtype have a 5-year OS of 76% vs 34% in the non-GCB group. Furthermore, studies have found a higher risk of CNS relapse in the ABC-like subtype compared to the GCB subtype0. Other gene rearrangements of potential importance to the risk of CNS relapse is "double hit" (DHL) (5-10% of newly diagnosed DLBCL patients) and MYC/BCL2 co-expressors (double expressors, DEL). Chemotherapeutic CNS prophylaxis is recommended based on the CNS-IPI stratification for the high-risk group (CNS-IPI 4-5) due to an estimated risk of CNS relapse of 10,2%. However, a relapse risk with a specificity of 10,2% results in almost 90% of the patients potentially receiving 'unnecessary' prophylactic chemotherapy with toxic side effects. One study published on data from the GOYA-trial have integrated COO into the CNS-IPI and found an increased sensitivity with a two year relapse risk of 15,2% in the high risk group. In this study we aim to validate the CNS-IPI and evaluate whether the addition of biomarkers for cell of origin (COO) and double hit (DH) DLBCL improves the prediction of later CNS relapse. This will be done through analysis of patientdata from the Danish nationwide lymphoma database, LYFO, on all patients with DLBCL diagnosed from 1.1.2014 to 1.1.2021 combined with pathology reports from the Danish Pathology registry.

Primary Objective: To evaluate objective response rate (ORR) in adult patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) who receive systemic treatment after at least 2 prior systemic therapies in the real-world setting according to Lugano classification of malignant lymphoma (Cheson, 2014) and as assessed by independent central review Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the following outcomes in adult patients with r/r DLBCL who are treated with currently available therapies in the real-world setting: ORR according to Lugano classification and as assessed by treating physician evaluation Complete Response (CR) rate according to Lugano classification and as assessed by: Independent central review, and Treating physician evaluation Progression Free Survival (PFS) according to Lugano classification and as assessed by: Independent central review, and Treating physician evaluation Overall Survival (OS) Duration of response (DOR) according to Lugano classification and as assessed by Independent central review and Treating physician evaluation Disease control rate (DCR) according to Lugano classification and as assessed by: Independent central reviewed Treating physician evaluation Time to next treatment (TTNT)