search

Active clinical trials for "Macular Edema"

Results 341-350 of 850

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of D-4517.2 After Subcutaneous...

Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationDiabetic Macular Edema

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of D-4517.2 after single subcutaneous (SC) doses in healthy participants.

Completed35 enrollment criteria

Safety and Efficacy of 9MW0813 in Subjects With Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic Macular Edema

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled phase I trial comparing the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of 9MW0813 and aflibercept (EYLEA®) after a single dose in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Completed15 enrollment criteria

Study of H.P. ACTHAR Subcutaneous Gelatin (Gel)(Highly Purified Gel Injection) in Uveitis Patients...

UveitisAnterior Uveitis4 more

Uveitis represents a heterogeneous group of diseases that results from ocular inflammatory reaction involving ocular tissue and vasculature. The inflammation usually causes pain, redness, photophobia and blurred vision. This inflammation, is typically treated with regional or systemic therapy. The regional therapy typically consists of topical corticosteroids or periocular or regional corticosteroids. Regional therapy can lead to a steroid response glaucoma, which is increased intraocular pressure.This pilot study aims to evaluate the possible effectiveness of H.P. Acthar in patients with active ocular inflammatory disease, and currently on treatment for glaucoma or have a history of glaucoma.

Completed19 enrollment criteria

Study of DS-7080a for the Treatment of Macular Degeneration

Neovascular Age-Related Macular DegenerationDiabetic Macular Edema

The purpose of this study is to test DS-7080a, a monoclonal antibody, as a new treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME). The hypothesis of the study is that DS-7080a is safe and shows preliminary efficacy in patients with these conditions either alone or in combination with ranibizumab. This study is organized into 3 Parts: Part 1 Dose Escalation in AMD participants, Part 2 Dose Expansion in AMD participants, and Part 3 Dose Expansion in DME participants. In Part 1, participants will be enrolled into 3 sequential, ascending dose-level cohorts in non-randomized uncontrolled manner with the main purpose to determine the recommended dose. In Part 2, participants will be randomized to 1 of 3 arms of either monotherapy with DS-7080a or monotherapy with ranibizumab, which is an active control, or combination therapy of DS-7080a plus ranibizumab (ranibizumab will be administered 30 minutes prior to DS-7080a). In Part 3, subjects with DME will be assigned to 1 of 2 arms of either monotherapy with DS-7080a or monotherapy with ranibizumab. DS-7080a or ranibizumab will be administered 3 times: on Baseline/Day 1, Day 29, and Day 57. Both Parts 2 and 3 will consist of 8 visits including a 14-day screening phase, an 84-day treatment period, and a 28-day follow-up period.

Completed61 enrollment criteria

DRCR.Net Aflibercept vs. Bevacizumab + Deferred Aflibercept for the Treatment of CI-DME

Diabetic Macular Edema

Both aflibercept and bevacizumab have been shown to improve vision in eyes with DME. In eyes with DME and at least moderate vision loss, both aflibercept and bevacizumab were also shown to be successful in many eyes. However, aflibercept was shown to be more effective at improving vision, on average, at 1 year and at 2 years. Due to the large cost difference between the two drugs, many clinicians and patients are choosing to initiate treatment with bevacizumab and then switch to aflibercept depending on the eye's response to bevacizumab treatment. However, there is no scientific evidence that this treatment strategy is as effective at improving vision as initiating treatment with aflibercept. Patients and clinicians do not know if this approach ultimately has deleterious effects on visual acuity. If starting with aflibercept is not better than starting with bevacizumab and switching to aflibercept if needed, the potential cost savings to future patients and the health care system would be substantial. However, if starting with aflibercept is better, then patients, clinicians, and health care providers can make informed decisions for how to best treat patients with DME and at least moderate vision loss. Study Objectives To compare the efficacy of intravitreous aflibercept with intravitreous bevacizumab + deferred aflibercept if needed in eyes with CI DME and moderate vision loss

Completed51 enrollment criteria

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab vs. Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment...

Diabetic Macular Edema

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).

Completed10 enrollment criteria

Suprachoroidal Injection of CLS-TA in Subjects With Macular Edema Associated With Non-infectious...

UveitisUveitis6 more

The study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of suprachoroidally administered triamcinolone acetonide, CLS-TA, in subjects with macular edema associated with non-infectious uveitis.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Randomized Clinical Trial of Intravitreal Bevacizumab Versus Intravitreal Bevacizumab Combined With...

Diabetic Macular Edema

The aim of this study is to determine whether oral losartan is effective in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) as an adjuvant for intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB).

Completed10 enrollment criteria

A Pilot Study on the Effect and Safety of Iluvien® in Chronic Diabetic Macular Edema Patients

Diabetic Macular Edema

To provide treating physicians with experience with ILUVIEN as well as monitoring its safety (and effectiveness) in a real-life chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) patients judged insufficiently responsive to available therapies.

Completed16 enrollment criteria

Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial of Luminate® as Compared to Avastin® in the Treatment of Diabetic...

Diabetic Macular Edema

A Phase 2 Multi center, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked Clinical Trial Designed To Evaluate The Safety And Exploratory Efficacy Of Luminate® (Alg-1001) As Compared To Avastin® In The Treatment Of Diabetic Macular Edema

Completed32 enrollment criteria
1...343536...85

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs