search

Active clinical trials for "Migraine with Aura"

Results 1-10 of 91

Responding With Evidence and Access for Childhood Headaches

HeadacheHeadache Disorders7 more

This comparative effectiveness study will clarify current first-line preventive treatment approaches for use by neurologists, psychologists, and primary care providers in the context of real world care, and will demonstrate the feasibility of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) via telehealth for youth with migraine. The focus is on applying evidence-based care and enhancing access to it. CBT via telehealth while taking a clinically-prescribed, pill-based prevention therapy (amitriptyline) will be compared to CBT via telehealth alone.

Recruiting10 enrollment criteria

PArtial REbreathing for Migraine With Aura 1

Migraine With Aura

A prospective, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group, group-sequential study to investigate safety and effectiveness of the Rehaler partial rebreathing device, in adults suffering from migraine with aura

Recruiting30 enrollment criteria

Mind Body Balance for Pediatric Migraine

HeadacheHeadache Disorders7 more

This study uses a factorial research design to evaluate a nurse delivered mind body intervention using different doses of 3 treatment components to determine the optimized treatment for headache day reduction.

Recruiting10 enrollment criteria

Transcutaneous Supraorbital Nerve Stimulator Versus Topiramate in Prevention of Recurrent Migraine...

MigraineClassic

Migraine has been ranked as the second most disabling neurological disorder in the worldwide. Medication or nonpharmacological treatments are all reasonable options for the prevention. Oral topiramate treatment is a typical effective method, while transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation (SNS) was reported to be valuable for migraine acute treatment and even the prevention. As a new nonpharmacological therapeutic method, whether SNS is equivalent to topiramate is still unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare their effects in a cohort of migraine patients. After diagnosed with recurrent or chronic migraine and consented to this research, patients received randomly treatments by either SNS or topiramate, and were followed up prospectively. After a 1-month period of baseline observation, patients were followed by a 1-month treatment, and next 2-month period of followup. At least the following assessments will be performed: (1) Change from baseline in the number of migraine days during the 3 observing months; (2) Change from baseline in the number of moderate/ severe headache days over the 3 observing months; (3) 50% responder rate for the reduction of migraine days (percentage of patients having at least 50% reduction of migraine days) during the first treating month. Comparison of outcome measures between the 2 treatment groups will be performed to show the equivalence of SNS versus topiramate.

Recruiting10 enrollment criteria

Efficacy of CLORazepate for the Treatment of MIGraine Attack in the Emergency Room

MigraineMigraine Without Aura2 more

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of clorazepate in addition to the usual medication for treating migraine attack in the emergency room

Recruiting19 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diclofenac Potassium and Rimegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine...

Migraine With AuraMigraine Without Aura

In a real-world population of adults with migraine, the investigators would like to investigate whether 50 mg diclofenac potassium is non-inferior to 75 mg rimegepant in terms of pain freedom at 2 hours after drug intake.

Recruiting34 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Almotriptan and Ubrogepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine

Migraine With AuraMigraine Without Aura

In a real-world population of adults with migraine, the investigators would like to investigate whether 12.5 mg almotriptan is non-inferior to 50 mg ubrogepant in terms of pain freedom at 2 hours after drug intake.

Recruiting34 enrollment criteria

Understanding the Pathophysiology of Migraine Pain

Migraine DisordersMigraine2 more

Migraine is the most common headache disorder, prevalent in 18% of females and 6% of males. Emergency room visits, physician consults, hospitalizations, medications, and indirect costs such as lost work days and decreased productivity place the global economic burden of migraines at over 20 billion dollars. It is prevalent in 28 million people in the US alone. Symptoms include unilateral, throbbing, debilitating headache pain accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Upwards of 75% of migraine patients have reduced functionability, have lost time at work, and 1/3 of patients require bed rest to manage the symptoms. The health-related impact on quality of life was comparable with that experienced by patients with congestive heart failure, hypertension, or diabetes. While the burden of migraines on our society is clear, the pathophysiology of migraines remains largely unknown. The trigeminovascular system, including the external and internal carotid arteries and their associated sensory fibers which subserve the head have long been implicated in the pain and cutaneous allodynia experienced by migraine patients. Wolff in 1953, was the first to posit that migraine headache pain is the caused by dilation or circumferential expansion of the extracranial carotid artery. He demonstrated that migraineurs had twice the pulse amplitude in their external carotid arteries compared to control subjects and these changes were directly correlated to migraine symptoms. In a 2008 study, randomized migraineurs received nitroglycerin via peripheral IV or placebo for 20 minutes prior to obtaining magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Nitroglycerin, a potent dilator of blood vessels, reliably induced migraine-like pain in up to 80% of patients, and transient dilation of vessels of up to nearly 40%, mostly in the extracranial vessels. Sumatriptan's efficacy in migraine relief provides further evidence for this theory, as it is a selective extracranial vessel constrictor which does not cross the blood brain barrier. The goal of this current work is to utilize the direct, real-time angiography, which provides a high resolution map of vasculature, and demonstrate changes in vessel flow in patients who have migraine headache attacks. This information may guide therapeutic interventions in the future in order to better treat these migraine patients.

Enrolling by invitation18 enrollment criteria

A Phase 2 Study Evaluating Naltrexone-Acetaminophen in Acute Migraine and Co-Occurring Anxiety in...

MigraineEpisodic Migraine4 more

Naltrexone has a dual function as an opioid receptor antagonist and a Toll-Like Receptor-4 (TLR4) antagonist. While primarily approved in a 50 mg tablet for treating opioid and alcohol addiction by blocking opioid receptors, naltrexone's TLR4-blocking effect is also significant. This action reduces the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines responsible for pain generation, primarily in the trigeminal ganglion and dorsal root ganglia. These sites play a key role in the effectiveness of naltrexone as a pain-alleviating agent. Acetaminophen is the active ingredient in Tylenol, an over-the-counter non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic agent. Both naltrexone and acetaminophen have demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of acute migraine, physical pain, and emotional pain. However, while naltrexone has demonstrated potential in animal and human studies, confirmatory clinical trials for pain treatment in humans are still lacking. Additionally, it is important to note that around 50% of migraine patients experience co-occurring anxiety. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of naltrexone-acetaminophen in treating migraine and co-occurring anxiety compared to each drug alone and placebo. The sponsor has conducted four clinical studies showing promising results of naltrexone-acetaminophen in treating migraine, chronic low-back pain, and emotional pain.

Not yet recruiting26 enrollment criteria

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TNX-1900 in Patients With Chronic Migraine

Chronic MigraineChronic Migraine3 more

This is a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, three arm parallel study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different dosages (30 IU daily and 60 IU daily) of TNX-1900 in patients with chronic migraine.

Active12 enrollment criteria
12...10

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs