Active clinical trials for "Cognitive Dysfunction"

The Overture Study is a randomized, controlled, single-blind multi-center clinical trial using the GammaSense Stimulation system to study safety, tolerability, and efficacy in people with mild to moderate cognitive impairment.

Purpose: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the therapeutic effects of donepezil in radiotherapy-related cognitive impairment. Further study details as provided by Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University / Yameitang. Primary outcome measure: cognitive improvement, which is determined by the difference value of ADAS-cog score before and after the treatment of donepezil.

The present study aims to evaluate the effect of cognitive stimulation (CS) in participants with a diagnosis of moderate and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared to control subjects not receiving any non-pharmacological interventions. Treated participants will receive a structured CS consisting of a wide range of activities aimed at the general improvement of social functioning and the maintenance of cognitive functions. The study consists of a 24-week treatment phase and a follow-up period of 24 weeks. During the treatment period, patients will receive two CS sessions a week. At baseline, all the participants undergo an extensive neuropsychological evaluation and a neurophysiological assessment aimed at studying the frequency of spontaneous blinking (blink rate) and cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity by means of the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuropsychological and neurophysiological evaluations will be repeated at the end of the treatment (week 24) and at the end of the follow-up period (week 48) in order to evaluate short- and long-term effects of CS. The hypothesis of this research is that CS may improve cognition and the neurophysiological parameters studied in treated participants compared to those untreated.

Older adults with type 2 diabetes experience cognitive decline and are at higher risk for developing dementia. Consequently, older adults at-risk for developing type 2 diabetes (based on body mass, glucose levels) are at higher risk for cognitive decline, and intervening at this point may prevent or delay the onset of such decline. One promising lifestyle intervention that has been shown to improve cognitive function in other populations is exercise. However, before investigators can examine whether exercise will improve cognitive function and brain health (structure and function) in this at-risk population, a feasibility pilot study is needed to determine whether a larger-scale trial would be viable.

Rationale: Older adults spend the majority of their time in sedentary behaviours (SB). High amounts of SB have been correlated with reduced cognitive performance. Long periods of time spent sitting results in excessive glycemic variability, potentially contributing to cognitive decline. Reducing/replacing SB with short intermittent bouts of light physical activity have shown positive effects on glycemic variability. Thus, interrupting prolonged sitting with bouts of light physical activity may regulate blood glucose and thus mitigate cognitive decline. Purpose: This study intends to investigate the appropriate interval frequency of post-prandial SB reduction, by light physical activity needed to optimize total and incremental area under the curve for glucose response in overweight older adults at risk for glucose intolerance with mild cognitive impairment in both lab and free-living environments. Second, this study aims to investigate the acute impact of reducing SB on glycemic variability and its relationship with cognition. Hypothesis: First, there will be a dose-dependent response of more frequent interruptions of SB (more frequent intervals of light physical activity) with better glycemic control. Second, reducing SB will result in less glycemic variability, which will translate into better levels of cognitive performance. Methods: Generalized linear mixed models with random intercepts will be used to evaluate the differential effects of the experimental conditions on the selected outcomes.

Depressive symptoms are common non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease and seriously affect the quality of life and prognosis of patients. Currently, treatment measures for patients with Parkinson's disease with depression are mainly limited to pharmacotherapy, but the side effects of antidepressants and their interaction with anti-Parkinsonian drugs limit the use of pharmacotherapy. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new painless and non-invasive neuromodulation technique that is commonly used in the treatment of depression. As the number of people with Parkinson's disease increases in China, the number of patients with Parkinson's disease and depression requiring rTMS treatment will also increase. The size and shape of individual brains, the distance between the stimulation coil and the responding neuronal tissue, and the location and orientation of anatomical structures are all different, and the use of common localization methods is usually limited by these individual anatomical differences. The traditional method relies on manual positioning of the coil, which is time-consuming and inefficient, and it is difficult to meet the requirements of position, angle, and coil orientation simultaneously. Studies have shown that the benefits of using navigation for rTMS treatment are up to twice as high as those of non-navigation methods. Therefore precise localization is a must for the future standardized application of rTMS in the development of patients with Parkinson's disease with depression. In this study, we applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with neuronavigation to treat patients with Parkinson's disease and depression, and reconstructed cephalometric models with individual cranial imaging data to individualize and precisely target stimulation sites, making rTMS more precise and effective in treating patients with Parkinson's disease and depression, and providing new avenues for further clinical and scientific research.

Cerebral blood flow is tightly regulated to ensure constant cerebral perfusion independently from systemic blood pressure fluctuations. This mechanism is termed cerebrovascular autoregulation and preserves adequate cerebral perfusion in a range between 50 and 150 mmHg of cerebral perfusion pressure. Upper and lower autoregulatory limits may vary individually. Beyond the autoregulatory range the protective autoregulatory response is lost, facilitating cerebral ischemia or hyperemia. The cerebrovascular response may be altered during general anesthesia, through direct effects of anesthetic agents on the vascular tone, changes of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide or the administration of vasoactive substances. The association of perioperative impairment of cerebral autoregulation and postoperative cognitive function has been discussed controversially.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial will be conducted, using data from participants who met the diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment and who participated in a primary clinical trial that investigated the effectiveness of treatment with tDCS for patients with this pathology. The study in question seeks to investigate differences in inflammatory profile and gene expression in peripheral blood of patients with MCI responders and non-responders to treatment with tDCS, where it is intended to establish a profile of biomarkers that can predict disease progression. Primary study participants will be assessed previously for eligibility, then randomized to receive sham or active tDCS. Then, they will be invited to participate in the prediction analysis study to identify the inflammatory profile and gene expression. The participants' venous blood will be collected during the clinical examination on the first day of treatment, before the first session of tDCS, with a new collection after the last session, that is, at the baseline and the end point of our study.

Memory mistakes are one of the most detrimental symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). In this study the investigators will measure the long-term efficacy of memory strategies in patients with AD. First, the efficacy of the strategies will be evaluated in the laboratory by analyzing the behavioral response and the brain activity of the patients. During the first visit, patients will be taught the memory strategies and asked to repeat them at home for 4 weeks. During this period of time, patients will perform several memory tasks while their performance and brain activity will be measured using portable devices. Monitoring brain activity and behavioral responses to memory tasks will provide insightful information on the efficacy of the strategies and allow the investigation of how patients can maintain the strategies over time. The research will examine if improving memory through the use of cognitive strategies, can positively affect other domains of daily life.

This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. In this study, 510 patients with cognitive impairment of cerebral small vessel disease who met the inclusion criteria are randomly included in multiple centers and randomized into two groups (standard treatment group and mouse nerve growth factor addition treatment group). The standard treatment group is treated with conventional drugs and cholinesterase inhibitors. In addition to the above treatment, the mouse nerve growth factor addition treatment group is administered with nerve growth factor 20 μg (9000 U)/vial for 14 consecutive days, intramuscularly once a day. Systematic clinical evaluation of patient cognitive function is performed at baseline, 14-day, and 3-month follow-up, and imaging (MR) is also evaluated twice at baseline, 14-day, and 3-month follow-up. At last observe the clinical effect of mouse nerve growth factor on cognitive impairment of cerebral small vessel disease.