Active clinical trials for "Multiple Sclerosis"

In the last 5 years, the available literature evidence has indicated that, in terms of clinical efficacy, telerehabilitation can give comparable results compared to face-to-face rehabilitation. Studies of post-stroke patients have revealed some benefits of telerehabilitation, such as the ability for patients to self-record pain, mood and activity. Telerehabilitation has comparable efficacy to face-to-face rehabilitation for the recovery of some abilities, such as motor function, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and independence; it is less effective, however, for the recovery of balance control. Published reviews concerning, in particular, neurological/neurodegenerative diseases show that telerehabilitation systems are effective in maintaining and/or improving some motor aspects, such as balance and gait, and non-motor aspects, such as mood and quality of life; they also increase patient satisfaction, so in the long term they appear to be beneficial, convenient and satisfying for patients and operators. ARC Intellicare is a device undergoing certification as a Class I Medical Device (DM), already clinically tested during two uncontrolled clinical feasibility studies: ARCANGEL study (post-stroke, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03787433) and RICOMINCIARE study (post-COVID19 and Parkinson's disease, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05074771).

Ocrelizumab is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that showed in phase III trials a powerful effect on relapse rate and lesion load accumulation in the relapsing form of multiple sclerosis (RMS). This therapeutic agent also showed for the first time a significant reduction of disability progression in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS) patients, whereas all other anti-inflammatory drugs had failed to do so in well-conducted studies. This raises the possibility that ocrelizumab, beyond its effects on the adaptive immune system activation underlying white matter lesions and clinical relapses, could beneficially influence other mechanisms involved in the progressive phase of the disease, such as the innate immune microglial cells activation, that has been described to persist in a diffuse manner in the Central Nervous system (CNS). To date the activation of these cells is not accessible to classical Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) techniques, impeding the full investigation of the therapeutic efficacy of drugs such as ocrelizumab.

The goal of this study is to establish that a memory retraining protocol, originally developed for English-speakers, and translated into Spanish, is effective.

FDA-approved multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) target the relapsing phase of MS but have minimal impact once the progressive phase has begun. It is unclear if, in the relapsing phase, there is an advantage of early aggressive therapy with respect to preventing long-term disability. The infectious risks and other complications associated with higher-efficacy treatments highlight the need to quantify their effectiveness in preventing disability. The TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for MS (TREAT-MS) trial is a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that has two primary aims: 1) to evaluate, jointly and independently among patients deemed at higher risk vs. lower risk for disability accumulation, whether an "early aggressive" therapy approach, versus starting with a traditional, first-line therapy, influences the intermediate-term risk of disability, and 2) to evaluate if, among patients deemed at lower risk for disability who start on first-line MS therapies but experience breakthrough disease, those who switch to a higher-efficacy versus a new first-line therapy have different intermediate-term risk of disability.

The DELIVER-MS study seeks to answer the question: Does early treatment with highly effective DMT improve the prognosis for people with MS? This is an area of significant controversy and no data currently exist to guide treatment choices for patients and clinicians. The study results will help guide overall treatment philosophy and will be applicable not only to a wide range of existing therapies but also to new therapies, meeting a significant unmet need in patient decision making and aiding the decision for medication approval by third parties.

This study examines a home-based computerized cognitive rehabilitation intervention in adults with multiple sclerosis compared to placebo (videogame). Patients are assessed through pre-and post neuropsychological testing.

The etiologic mechanisms involved in multiple sclerosis (MS) are not yet fully understood. Indeed MS is a multifactorial disease involving genetic and environmental factors and Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV) could be one of these factors. However the link between EBV infection and the immunological mechanisms underlying MS is not clear. Robust sero-epidemiological evidences support an association between EBV infection and MS, and immunological data suggest an altered/deficient immune response against this virus. In healthy individuals EBV produces a persistent infection that is tightly controlled by the immune system. In patients with MS, cellular and humoral immune studies demonstrate an altered response against the virus with a T-cell abnormal reactivity against the EBV-infected autologous B-cells, elevated humoral immune response to Epstein Barr Nuclear Antigen-1, and in the case of children, an increased EBV shedding, demonstrating frequent EBV reactivations. Thus, it has been proposed, that patients with MS present a partially inefficient control of the EBV infection. Some experimental data support the hypothesis suggesting that the presence of autoreactive EBV-B cells in the meninges of patients, probably due to an insufficient clearance of these cells by the immune system, lead to the infiltration of autoreactive T cells. Another hypothesis also suggests a deficient control of the virus, in that case during the inactive phase of the disease. Together, the above data and hypotheses lead to the notion that an immune intervention capable of restoring the host-EBV balance could be beneficial to MS patients In this project, we will assess the feasibility and safety of autologous transfer of several amounts of CD8 T cells directed against autologous EBV transformed B cell lines, in order to finally restore an efficient control of EBV in MS patients. The main objective of the project is to test the feasibility and safety of the process, while efficacy parameters will be also assessed in secondary objectives.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and tolerability of the intranodal administration of autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells tolerised with Vitamin-D3 and pulsed with myelin peptides (tolDC-VitD3) in multiple sclerosis patients . To select the most appropriate regime for the development of future therapeutic trials. To evaluate the preliminary proof of concept by clinical and/or radiological activity and immunological markers.

The primary goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of bazedoxifene (BZA) as remyelinating agent in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The investigators will utilize electrophysiologic techniques and magnetic resonance imaging to quantify the effect of treatment in 50 women over the course of 6 months. Participants may remain on their standard disease modifying treatment during the course of the trial but may not concurrently participate in any other investigational new drug research study.

This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and descriptive efficacy of BIIB017 in pediatric participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of BIIB017 in pediatric participants with RRMS in Part 1. In Part 2, the study will evaluate the long-term safety of BIIB017 and further describe safety and the long-term multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes after BIIB017 treatment in participants who completed the study treatment at Week 96 in Part 1 of the study.