Outcome of Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Oromandibular Dystonia
Dystonia; OrofacialSymptoms of oromandibular dystonia can be alleviated by injections of botulinum toxin. The scope of this study is to describe the efficacy of this procedure, by a retrospective systematic review of patients medical charts
Telemedicine Follow-up for Patients With Cervical Dystonia Treated With Neurotoxin Injections
Cervical DystoniaTelemedicineMany cervical dystonia (CD) patients are limited in their ability to travel to the clinic for follow-up in between injection visits. A telemedicine visit at the time of peak effectiveness of neurotoxin treatment may be valuable in informing the neurologist's choice of muscle selection and/or dose for the next injection visit. The primary objective of this study is to investigate both patient and physician satisfaction with the use of our telemedicine tool for this type of follow-up. After assessment of the subject, the neurologist will decide whether or not the telemedicine visit was informative to the upcoming injection visit. Subjects will answer questions at the end of the visit regarding their satisfaction with the follow-up and overall telemedicine communication. The principle investigator will complete a similar survey with additional questions about information gathered from the visit to assess the primary objective. A secure video communications platform will be used for the visit, which will occur 2-4 weeks after the patient's last neurotoxin injection (around the time of peak effectiveness). The investigating neurologist will remotely assess the patient and make notes for the next injection visit.
MyoSense- Automated Muscle Hypertonicity Classification System
StrokeDystonia1 moreIt is often difficult to quantify and distinguish aspects of abnormal muscle tone due to neurological injury. This makes it difficult to evaluate therapies that aim to reduce the effects of abnormal muscle tone. This research study will evaluate the feasibility of a clinician worn device to capture and quantify features of spasticity and dystonia.
Neurotransmitter Measurements Using (WINCS) During Deep Brain Stimulation Neurosurgery
Essential TremorParkinson's Disease1 moreIn this study, the investigators will monitor extracellular neurotransmitter levels using a probe that is able to perform real time electrochemical detection during deep brain stimulation surgery. The overall question this study is designed to answer is: Are there neurotransmitters released during deep brain stimulation?
A Retrospective Chart Review of BOTOX® and Xeomin® for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia and Blepharospasm...
Cervical DystoniaBlepharospasmThis study is a retrospective chart review to evaluate the doses of botulinum Type A toxins BOTOX® (onabotulinumtoxinA) and Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) used for the treatment of Cervical Dystonia and Blepharospasm in clinical practice.
CD-PROBE: Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for the Observation of onabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy...
Cervical DystoniaThis study is an observational trial which will measure the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA in treating Cervical Dystonia.
Trial Evaluating Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) for Cervical Dystonia or Blepharospasm in the United...
Cervical DystoniaBlepharospasmThis is a prospective, observational trial evaluating the "real world" use of Xeomin®(incobotulinumtoxinA). Physicians may enroll patients who are eligible to be treated with a botulinum toxin for cervical dystonia or blepharospasm based upon their clinical experience. The physician must have chosen to treat the patient with Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) prior to and independent of enrollment in this study. Physicians may choose to treat their subjects with up to 2 treatment cycles (approximately 6 months/subject) of Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) at a dose determined by the physician based upon his/her clinical experience with botulinum toxin. According and dependent on clinical practice, the investigators expect that subjects will be seen by the investigator for an average of 3 visits (two treatment cycles).
Muscle Contraction in Patients With Focal Hand Dystonia
Focal Hand DystoniaThis study will examine and compare brain activity in people with focal hand dystonia (FHD) and healthy volunteers to obtain further knowledge about the underlying cause of FHD. Patients with dystonia have muscle spasms that cause abnormal postures while trying to perform a movement; FHD affects the hands and fine finger movements. During fine finger movement, the brain controls muscles in a process called surround inhibition. This process may be impaired in people with hand dystonia, leading to uncontrolled overactivity in muscles and impairing motor function. Healthy volunteers and patients with FHD over 18 years of age may be eligible for this study. Candidates are screened with a physical and neurological examination. In a series of three experiments conducted during a single clinic visit, participants undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while performing a finger movement. A wire coil is placed on the subject's scalp. A brief electrical current is passed through the coil, creating a magnetic pulse that travels through the scalp and skull and causes small electrical currents in the outer part of the brain. The stimulation may cause muscle, hand or arm twitching, or may affect movement or reflexes. During the stimulation, the subject is asked to contract one finger. In addition to TMS, subjects have surface electromyography. For this test, they sit in a chair with their hands placed on a pillow on their lap. The electrical activity of three muscles in the right hand is recorded by electrodes (small metal disks) taped to the skin over the muscles.
DYSCAR: Characterization of Dystonia
DystoniaParkinson DiseaseDystonia is a rare disease leading to a severe handicap. It can be of primary or secondary origin. It is characterized by sustained muscle contractions, frequently causing twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal postures. These disorders are believed to be caused by some dysfunction of the basal ganglia (BG) circuitry, but the mechanisms are largely unknown. A better understanding of the disorder requires significant improvements of its phenomenological description in relation to aetiology. We want to identify specific motor signatures of different forms of dystonia. To that aim, we will ask patients to perform movements of various complexities, while recording chronometric, kinematics and EMG data. The characteristics of the patients' movements will be compared to those of matched control subjects. We will examine abnormal co-activation in distal and proximal muscles to evaluate the characteristics of the loss of selectivity of the motor command in mobile vs. fixed dystonia. Consistency of the motor output patterns will be compared in three groups of patients. We will also study possible cognitive and limbic components of the disease, examining the influence of cognitive and emotional loads on movement production. Eventually we want to refine the criteria used to classify different forms of the disease, thus enabling clinicians to better predict the likely outcome of particular therapeutic procedures.
Brain Function in Focal Dystonia
DystoniaObjectives The main objectives of this proposal are (1) to characterize motor learning abnormalities in patients with focal dystonia; (2) to show, using transcranial magnetic stimulation, that this abnormal motor learning went together with an impaired modulation by somatosensory inputs of short and long-interval paired-pulse inhibitions (sICI, lICI) and facilitations (sICF, ICF) of MEPs (ICIs and ICFs are thought to reflect activity of inhibitory and excitatory interneuron's in the primary motor cortex M1); (3) to show that abnormalities of long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD)-like mechanisms (tested using a paired associative stimulation (PAS) intervention), thought to play a crucial role in learning, are associated in dystonia with an abnormal modulation of ICIs and ICFs by somatosensory inputs. Study population 30 patients with a focal upper limb dystonia and 45 healthy volunteers will take part in the main study. 7 patients with a focal upper limb dystonia and 12 healthy volunteers will take part in the control study. Design In the main study: subjects will complete 5 different sessions: visit 1: clinical screening, 1 hour; visit PAS session, 3 hours; visit 3: a minimum of 7 days later, motor learning session, 3 hours; visit 4: follow-up 24 hours later, 1 hour and a half; visit 5, follow-up 48 hours later, 1 hour and a half. During the PAS session they will receive 15 minutes of repeated paired stimulations (transcranial magnetic stimulation -TMS- and peripheral stimulation) thought to produce LTP/LTD like phenomena in M1. During the motor learning sessions they will be asked to perform, as fast as possible, a metronome-paced (0.5 Hz) pinch of their index finger and thumb. They will have 3 blocks of motor practice during the motor learning session. Between each block of motor practice and before and after PAS, while they rest, subjects will receive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulations (TMS) associated or not with peripheral nerve stimulation in order to assess interactions at M1 cortical level between somatosensory incoming volleys and intracortical inhibitory and excitatory interneuron's. In the control study: subjects will complete a unique session. They will receive a PAS intervention. Before and after the PAS intervention, spinal excitability will be tested by the means of H reflexes evoked in wrist flexor muscles. Outcome measures: The behavioral effect of the motor training or of the PAS intervention will be assessed by measuring the mean peak acceleration (MPA) of thumb movement during the blocks of motor practice and the mean maximal peak force (MPF) between the index finger and thumb before and after the blocks of motor practice. The activity of different sets of intracortical interneurons (short and long interval GABA related inhibitions: sICI, lICI, intracortical glutamate-related facilitation: ICF and short interval facilitation: sICF) can be tested using paired-pulse TMS paradigms. The effect of learning (or of PAS intervention) on the interaction between somatosensory afferent input and intracortical processes will be assessed by comparing the amount of sICI, lICI, ICF and sICF when associated or not with a peripheral nerve stimulation (median and ulnar nerve stimulation) in a trained muscle (flexor pollicis brevis: FPB) and a non-trained muscle (abductor digiti minimi: ADM) at different times during and after the motor learning or the PAS intervention. The effect of PAS on spinal cord excitability will be assessed by comparing the size of the H reflex before and after PAS.