search

Active clinical trials for "Myocardial Infarction"

Results 1241-1250 of 2532

Using AtorVASTatin to Prevent VAscular Inflammatory OccLUSion in the Critically Ill

Myocardial InfarctionStroke1 more

Patients are admitted to the critical care unit of the hospital because of medical conditions that have a high likelihood of causing severe problems with blood flow, breathing, or brain function. These conditions also have a high likelihood of causing death. Approximately 10 to 15% of all critically ill patients die in hospital. A large amount of scientific evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of these deaths is due to a combination of blot clotting and inflammation in the blood vessels. Statins are drugs that interfere with cholesterol and fat metabolism. Cholesterol and fat in the blood are associated with blood clotting and inflammation in the blood vessels. Statins are known to be very beneficial in improving the survival after heart attacks, and in preventing heart attacks. The question that VASTVALUS asks is: do statins improve survival among all critically ill patients? In VASTVALUS, we will concentrate on patients that do not currently require a statin because of their medical condition e.g. after a heart attack, but we are concerned with the rest of the critically ill. In VASTVALUS, participating patients will receive either atorvastatin 80 mg daily or a placebo. Atorvastatin is a statin with a well-established record of safety and effectiveness. A placebo has no known medical activity. We will follow all patients in VASTVALUS to determine whether atorvastatin has any effect on the occurrence of death, stroke, heart attack, or kidney failure among the critically ill. Results from VASTVALUS will be shared with the medical community after the study is completed. As with all clinical trials, patients in VASTVALUS participate of their own choice, and can change their mind at any time.

Completed26 enrollment criteria

AngelMed for Early Recognition and Treatment of STEMI

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)Coronary Occlusion1 more

A prospective, randomized multicenter study of subjects with a high-risk of having a myocardial infarction (MI) due to acute coronary syndrome or bypass surgery. There is no differential intervention administered to the two arms of the ALERTS Study. The study evaluates whether or not a patient alarm from the Guardian System will provide benefit (e.g. shorten pre-hospital delay) compared to symptoms-only ER presentation in the event of a heart attack. An amendment to the data analysis protocol was collaboratively created by AngelMed and FDA, and was adopted by AngelMed on 4/22/2017.

Completed30 enrollment criteria

LV Thrombus Pilot Study for Comparing Enoxaparin Vs. Warfarin

Coronary Artery DiseaseAcute Myocardial Infarction

To prospectively evaluate the utility of enoxaparin vs. oral warfarin in reduction of echocardiographic indices of LV mural thrombus. The primary outcome is the presence of LV mural thrombus at 3.5 months. The secondary outcome is cost analysis comparing the two arms.

Completed25 enrollment criteria

Intravenous Isosorbide Dinitrate Versus Sublingual Isosorbide Dinitrate for the Relief of Acute...

Unstable AnginaMyocardial Infarction

This is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study, clinical trail designed to evaluate the efficacy safety and superiority of intravenous boluses of isosorbide dinitrate for the relief of acute anginal pain episodes in acute coronary syndrome patients in comparison with the usual manner of S/L isosorbide dinitrate .

Withdrawn20 enrollment criteria

Effects of Early Statin Treatment After Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in Japanese Patients

Myocardial Infarction

Statins have been shown to prevent coronary artery disease and to preserve left ventricular function in dilated cardiomyopathy. The investigators hypothesized that the early use of statins would reduce cardiovascular events including heart failure in acute myocardial infarction patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether early (within 96 hours after onset) use of any available statins are effective to prevent cardiovascular events including heart failure after acute myocardial infarction in Japanese patients.

Completed13 enrollment criteria

Vitamin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke

StrokeCerebral Infarction1 more

A stroke occurs when part of the brain is damaged from lack of normal blood supply. This may result in difficulty with feeling, speech, muscle strength or coordination, movement, thinking, or other brain functions. Having a stroke increases the risk of another stroke occurring in the future. Higher blood levels of a natural chemical known as homocysteine may contribute to hardening of the arteries in the brain or heart and increase the risk of stroke or heart attack. Folic acid, vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), and vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) may lower blood levels of homocysteine and reduce the risk of having another stroke or a heart attack.

Completed21 enrollment criteria

Cardiac Arrest in Seattle: Conventional Versus Amiodarone Drug Evaluation (CASCADE)

ArrhythmiaCardiovascular Diseases4 more

To compare the efficacy of amiodarone to conventional anti-arrhythmic therapy in individuals who had survived one episode of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Completed1 enrollment criteria

Women's Health Study (WHS): A Randomized Trial of Low-dose Aspirin and Vitamin E in the Primary...

Cardiovascular DiseasesCerebrovascular Disorders5 more

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of low-dose aspirin and vitamin E in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer in apparently healthy women.

Completed3 enrollment criteria

Early Treatment With Evolocumab in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

This is a prospective, multi-centre, open label, randomised study of Phase II that enrolls patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), comparing Evolocumab versus Standard of Care.

Withdrawn17 enrollment criteria

Intensive Prevention Program After Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial InfarctionPrevention Harmful Effects

It is unknown, if a modern prevention program, including intense nurse-coordinated education sessions, regular telephone contacts and a telephone hotline for 12 months, significantly reduces cardiovascular risk factors, clinical events and quality of life in myocardial infarction patients compared to usual care. Furthermore, actually no data on the additional effects and the feasibility of longterm telemetric care of cardiovascular risk factors exist. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that an intensive longterm prevention program compared to the standard of medical care, will achieve better risk factor control and consecutively less clinical adverse events in patients after myocardial infarctions. The study endpoints will be evaluated after 12 months and during long-term course (after 24 months = one year after termination of the prevention program). In a substudy the effects of short reinterventions ("Prevention Boosts") during long-term course are tested (IPP Prevention Boost Study). Patients with at least one insufficiently controlled risk factor at 24-months visit are randomly assigned to a short (2-month) reintervention vs. no reintervention. The effects of the reinterventions on risk factor control are evaluated after 36 months. A further substudy focusing on young patients <= 45 years of age at time of MI (IPP-Y = IPP in the Young) was added after completion of the pilot IPP study. In this study we focus on the prevention program in young MI-patients. A retrospective analysis of individual genetic risk (assessed by genetic risk scores) in the young patients is included in this substudy.

Completed7 enrollment criteria
1...124125126...254

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs