Active clinical trials for "Neoplasms, Plasma Cell"

This is a first-in-human, multi-center, open-label clinical study with separate dose escalation (Phase 1) and expansion (Phase 2) stages to assess preliminary safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the second generation oral XPO1 inhibitor KPT-8602 in participants with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HRMDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and newly diagnosed intermediate/high-risk MDS. Dose escalation and dose expansion may be included for all parts of the study as determined by ongoing study results.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of the addition of daratumumab to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in terms of progression-free survival in subjects with relapsed or refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Patients included in the study will receive induction treatment during 6 months, followed by receive high-dose therapy followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Approximately 3 months after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation patients will receive consolidation treatment during 2 months. Subsequently patients will start maintenance treatment during 24 months. Therefore, the total duration of the treatment will be approximately 36 months.

To compare the efficacy of the combination of lenalidomide with low-dose melphalan versus high-dose melphalan in newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM patients.

This randomized phase III trial studies melphalan and prednisone with thalidomide to see how well it works compared to melphalan and prednisone together with lenalidomide in treating patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as melphalan and prednisone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Thalidomide and lenalidomide may stop the growth of multiple myeloma by blocking blood flow to the cancer. It is not yet known whether melphalan and prednisone are more effective when given together with thalidomide or lenalidomide in treating multiple myeloma.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of the bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We are looking for the highest dose of the combination that can be given safely and see how well it works as a combination in newly diagnosed patients.

The purpose of this study is to test any good and bad effects of giving a combination of study drugs before and after autologous stem cell transplant.

According to international guidelines, upfront therapy for transplant eligible myeloma patients should include triplet induction containing proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory agent, autologous stem cell transplant, PI+Imid based triplet consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance. Despite this approach, virtually all MM patients experience disease relapse, especially those with High Risk disease defined by adverse cytogenetic abnormalities (i.e. del(17p), or t(14;16) or t(4;14)) detected by FISH and/or SNP arrays. Indeed, HR myeloma is associated with poorer progression free survival and overall survival and frontline therapy should therefore be improved for this subset of HR patients. The primary objective of this prospective multicenter, open label, interventional phase 2 trial is to evaluate the feasibility of an intensive program including quadruplet induction and consolidation, tandem autologous stem cell transplantation and maintenance in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients presenting with HR cytogenetic. Quadruplet induction and consolidation include carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and daratumumab. Maintenance will include lenalidomide and daratumumab. Secondary objectives will include efficacy parameters (i.e. response rate, minimal residual disease, safety, progression free survival, overall survival).

Primary Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of isatuximab administered subcutaneously (SC) versus intravenously (IV) To assess the safety and tolerability (including local injection site tolerability) of isatuximab using the (investigational) isatuximab injector device To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of SC and IV isatuximab Secondary Objectives: To estimate absolute bioavailability of SC and IV isatuximab To measure receptor occupancy (RO) after isatuximab SC versus IV administration To assess efficacy of isatuximab after SC and IV administration To assess patient expectations prior to and patient experience and satisfaction after SC administration To evaluate potential immunogenicity of SC or IV isatuximab

The incorporation of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs into the standard of care has improved the outcome for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) over the past 10 years. However, most patients (>85%) still eventually relapse around 3-4 years after diagnosis, and ultimately die of their disease, despite salvage therapies. Relapse can occur even when complete remission is achieved after first-line therapy. Currently, daratumumab (Dara) is approved by the american FDA and EMA in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (Dex) or bortezomib and Dex for the treatment of MM patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Therefore, the Dara-Len-Dex combination is likely to become the most widely used standard of care regimen for MM at the time of first relapse. However, although approval of the latter combination is meant for until disease progression (PD) ("continuous therapy") (CT), the actual optimal duration of relapse treatment is still unknown. Of note, many experts advocate that a "fixed duration" of therapy should be favored, especially if one can show that CT does not translate into a significant overall survival (OS) benefit. As a matter of fact, given the extremely high cost of such novel agents (>100 KEuros/year/patient), the pharmacoeconomic consequences of a "continuous" versus "fixed" duration therapy are also of utmost importance. Based on this background, the investigator propose to conduct a non-inferiority phase III randomized, multicenter, open label trial for treatment of MM at first relapse, comparing the Dara-Len-Dex combination administered continuously until PD, versus a fixed duration of 24 months. The choice of this duration is justified by the currently available evidence with respect to achievement of a plateau in terms of deep disease response, patients' compliance, and physicians' preference according to different surveys. The primary objective of this study is to estimate the OS rate at 4 years after diagnosis of relapse and initiation of salvage therapy. The primary endpoint is OS at 4 years after randomization. The analysis will be performed on both per-protocol and intent-to-treat sets of patients.