Active clinical trials for "Neuralgia"

This study is designed to evaluate the effect of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the resolution of chronic pain. Participants will be patients with Multiple Sclerosis suffering from chronic pain of neurological origin.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of cortical stimulation (CS) as an adjunctive treatment for chronic neuropathic pain.

The present study will aim to determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of etoricoxib, an NSAID pain reliever, in patients with Neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain, or pain caused by abnormal activity of sensory neurons, remains undertreated. Post herpetic neuralgia (PHN), which is commonly referred to as post-shingles pain, is the most useful disease to study when investigating the efficacy of pain relievers for Neuropathic pain. Therefore, this study will primarily involve patients with PHN. The hypothesis in this study is that etoricoxib efficacy is superior to that of placebo.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SLC022 in treating pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) in recently diagnosed patients.

Prevalence of chronic pain has been shown to be high after thermal injury. Post-burn neuropathic pain causes chronic disabilities that is often difficult to treat effectively. Pain Scrambler therapy is a patient-specific electrocutaneous nerve stimulation device. To study changes in the pain network associated with neuropathic pain, magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) was used to evaluate cerebral blood volume(CBV) in patients who had been injuried by burn. Participants (N=40, experimental 20 and control group 20) comprised patients with neuropathic pain after thermal injury. The subjects complained of severe neuropathic pain that was rated at least 5 on the visual analogue scale (VAS), despite treatments with gabapentin medication and other physical modalities. Each Scrambler therapy with the MC5-A Calmare® therapy device (Competitive Technologies, Inc. Fairfield, USA ) was performed for 40 min daily (Monday through Friday) for 10 consecutive days. The stimulus was increased to the maximum intensity bearable by the individual patient without causing any additional pain or discomfort. The intensity of neuropathic pain was measured using the visual analogue scale(VAS). Depressive mood was assessed using the Beck Depression Scale. Voxel-wise comparisons of relative CBV maps were made between before scrambler therapy and after 10 scrambler therapy sessions over the entire brain volume. The relationship between individual participant CBV(measured in voxels), BDS and VAS score was also examined. We observed decreased in the cerebral pain network of patients with burn injury. Scrambler therapy is a non-invasive, non-medicinal modality that significantly reduced burn-associated neuropathic pain. Scrambler therapy should be considered as a treatment option for burn survivors with severe neuropathic pain.

This a single center study comparing two forms of electrical stimulation: sub-sensory burst stimulation (DRG-Burst3D) and standard low frequency stimulation (DRG-LF) in the dorsal root ganglion of subjects diagnosed with neuropathic pain

neural exercise in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome

Assessment of pain intensity on the NRS. Assessment of the quality of life by SF-36 and AIS. Diagnostic/prognostic nerve block with 5 ml of 2% lidocaine under real-time ultrasound control with confirmation of the correct position of the needle using a peripheral nerve stimulator. Reassessment of pain intensity on the NRS 30 minutes after local anesthetic block. Cryoablation under real-time ultrasound control if the NRS value is reduced by ≥ 2 points. If pain intensity on the NRS reduced by less than 2 points, reassessment 60 minutes after local anesthetic block. Cryoablation under real-time ultrasound control if the NRS value is reduced by ≥ 2 points. If pain intensity on the NRS reduces by less than 2 points 60 minutes after local anesthetic block cryoablation will not be performed. Cryoablation effect will be evaluated 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months post procedure. 24 hours after the procedure - assessment of pain intensity and quality of life 7 days after the procedure - assessment of pain intensity 30 days after the procedure - assessment of pain intensity and quality of life 3 months after the procedure - assessment of pain intensity 6 months after the procedure - assessment of pain intensity and quality of

AIM: To provide initial information on the efficacy (pain reduction) and safety of focused ultrasound surgery for the ablation of stump neuromas in amputees with chronic neuropathic pain. PARTICIPANTS: The study will include 10 amputees (men/women age >18 years old) with chronic (>3 months) phantom/residual limb pain (NPS ≥ 4). DESIGN: Patients potentially qualifying for the study will be offered an Informed Consent to sign prior to further evaluation. Those who accept will sign the informed consent, complete study questionnaires and be evaluated in terms of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Specifically, a complete medical history will be obtained to determine the patient's general health status, current symptoms, frequency and dosage of their current analgesic intake etc. Baseline pain scores will be established. If not performed within six months prior to the evaluation, a contrast MRI of the stump will be performed. Patients not meeting the study criteria will be exited from the study as screen failures and not be included in analyses. All qualifying patients will complete a baseline MRI exam on treatment day. Any patient not meeting study criteria at Imaging will be exited as screen failures. After completion of the MRI exam, qualifying patients will proceed to the ExAblate treatment. These patients will then be followed for 6-months post-ExAblate treatment; the patients will complete study follow-up questionnaires at 1, 3 days, 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatments. Follow-up visits will take place 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment to assess their pain status, their quality of life and safety. Data regarding dosage and frequency of analgesic intake for the management of post amputation NP will be collected. Relevant cost data will be collected in order to enable an assessment of the total cost of the procedure.

Phantom and residual limb pain are types of peripheral neuropathic pain that are difficult to treat and where the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex is an increasingly studied technique for the treatment of neuropathic pain and has shown modest effects in pain intensity reduction for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Newer rTMS coils provide the opportunity to stimulate larger brain areas, which could provide a better treatment option compared to conventional coils. The aims of this study are to investigate whether the peripheral nervous system is a necessary driver of phantom limb pain and/or residual limb pain in patients with lower limb amputation using spinal anaesthesia, and to assess the analgesic efficacy of deep H-coil rTMS compared to sham stimulation in the same patients.