Active clinical trials for "No-Reflow Phenomenon"

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of intra-coronary administration of nicorandil on the prevention of lowering of coronary blood flow for high-risk plaque lesions defined as the high value of lipid core burden index in patients with coronary artery disease who require stent treatment.

The trial aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of the intracoronary administration of adrenalin, verapamil, as well as their combination compared to standard treatment in patients with STEMI and refractory coronary no-reflow despite conventional treatment during percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)

Prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Alpha Lipoic Acid administration on oxidative stress, inflammatory markers, clinical outcome and occurrence of No-Reflow in post myocardial infarction (MI) patients by assessment of aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) as a marker of oxidative stress and paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) as a marker of oxidative stress and inflammation.

Angiographic no-reflow during primary PCI procedures occurs at relatively high rate (25%) and is associated with worsening of long term morbidity and mortality. The exact mechanism of no-reflow is not fully understood, yet it is believed to be multifactorial including microvascular plugging with activated platelets and thrombotic debris in addition to the microvascular dysfunction from the ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Despite a theoretical advantage of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPi) (like; Tirofiban) to suppress the intense platelets' activation/reaction; their use did not lead to a significant net benefit, because it was opposed by increased risk of bleeding. However, the bleeding that plagued GPi use was predominantly related to vascular access in the era femoral approach was the default. Moreover, there are some recent data suggesting that small intracoronary bolus of GPi was non-inferior to intravenous bolus-infusion dose with less bleeding events. This study plans to assess upfront premedication with small doses of GPi + Nitroglycerin ± Verapamil, with staged restoration of flow (repeated balloon inflation) to reduce angiographic no-reflow and CMR assessed microvascular occlusion (MVO).

The study intends to evaluate the efficacy of different medicine delivering by targeted perfusion catheter in coronary administration on coronary blood flow in STEMI patients with CSFP.

No-reflow is defined as the lack of myocardial perfusion despite opening of the epicardial coronary vessels in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It has been demonstrated that either impaired flow or the absence of flow is associated with an increased rate of mortality. Among available treatment options, intracoronary adenosine is widely used in clinical practice, moreover, adrenaline is a safe alternative for the cases where use of adenosine is limited due to presence of hypotension or bradycardia. Nonetheless, evidence from retrospective and observational studies suggest that intracoronary adrenaline is well tolerated and may exert encouraging effects in prompt recovery of flow in these patients. However, very limited data are available on efficacy of intracoronary (IC) adrenaline in normotensive patients. Therefore, this study is planned to study the hypothesis that; intracoronary adrenaline is safe and has significantly higher efficacy as compared to adenosine for the treatment of no-reflow in normotensive patients with acute coronary syndrome.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of intracoronary administration of tirofiban on no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI and occurrence of no-reflow phenomenon undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

The patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) present high mortality and morbidity rate,even treated with stenting in the blocked heart vessels. The appearance of no-reflow is common after re-opening of the blocked vessel. The no-reflow were commonly attributed to tiny blockage in coronary micro-vasculature by thrombus and spasm of the micro-vessel during stenting. An agent with more effective anti-clotting and micro-vessel dilation would be helpful to solve the issue of no-reflow. Ticagrelor was demonstrated to be a potent platelet inhibitor and a potent micro-vessel dilator which can influence metabolism of adenosine, a endogenous potent small vessel dilator. This study is to test the effectiveness of ticagrelor on improving reperfusion and minimizing the myocardial infarct size after PPCI in patients with AMI.

This study evaluates the effects of emotional status on coronary flow in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. Patients whom undergoing elective coronary angiography will fulfill the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. State Anxiety Inventory will be fulfilled both before the intervention and after 1 hour the patients learned the results of the coronary angiography. The other scales will be performed after 1 hour the patients learned their results. Coronary flow will be assessed by TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) frame count method.

Myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the most common causes of death. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the main treatment option to restore blood flow through the infarction-related coronary artery (IRA) in MI patients. Performing PCI significantly reduces mortality, but in 5-10% cases, PCI is complicated by the development of coronary microvascular obstruction (CMVO, "no-reflow"). CMVO is defined as the absence of adequate myocardial perfusion, despite the restoration of the IRA lumen. The development of CMVO significantly worsens the prognosis and increases mortality. CMVO has a complex pathogenesis and is development due to following mechanisms: distal microembolism, ischemia-reperfusion injury, persistent endothelial dysfunction, and individual predisposition. These mechanisms can be implemented simultaneously and have different severity. The most significant predictors of CMVO occurrence are: age, time from pain onset to reperfusion, severity of acute heart failure, ineffective thrombolytic therapy, collateral blood flow according to the Rentrop classification, severity of IRA thrombosis according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) thrombus grade, initial IRA blood flow according to TIMI flow grade, implantation of 3 or more stents, direct IRA stenting, neutrophil and blood glucose levels. Difficulties in CMVO predicting are caused by the pathogenetic heterogeneity of this complication. Even the best models are moderately accurate. This can be explained by the fact that the models don't use genetic factors that determine endothelial function, microcirculation, hemostasis, and inflammation. Identification of the genetic determinants of the CMVO development can help create a new diagnostic system for CMVO predicting.