Active clinical trials for "Osteoarthritis, Knee"

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 loading and maintenance dose levels of CG100649 administered for 21 days in the treatment of osteoarthritis pain.

The primary aim of this study is to determine if the dietary supplements, glucosamine sulphate and/or chondroitin can limit or reduce structural disease progression whilst providing symptomatic benefit in people with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The specific hypotheses to be tested in the proposed double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial are that, compared to participants allocated to placebo, participants allocated to either or both of these dietary supplements will demonstrate: reduced medial tibio-femoral joint space narrowing at 2 years AND; reduced knee pain over 1 year These benefits will be achieved by participants allocated to glucosamine sulphate and/or chondroitin (the study treatments) without concomitant: increased use of analgesics reduced health-related quality of life reduced participation in leisure-time physical activity

This study is a randomised controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different exercise based treatments in the management of patients with knee problems related to degenerative (wear and tear) changes. Recent evidence suggests that putting weight through a joint (joint loading) may be beneficial. The Investigators know that physiotherapy and exercise is important in treating these patients, but the investigators do not know which exercises work best. In this study the investigators will be comparing current physiotherapy care against a new programme of exercises that gradually increases the amount of joint loading. The study will recruit approximately 140 patients from the Leeds Musculoskeletal (MSK) service, who are over the age of 45 and have been referred for physiotherapy by their GP for activity related knee pain.Patients who are suitable and happy to take part will be selected randomly (not chosen by the patient or physiotherapist) to receive either normal physiotherapy treatment, or the knee loading exercises. The treatment phase will last for six weeks and participants will be asked to carry out their exercises twice daily during this time. At the end of this period, patients will be asked tocomplete questionnaires and again at six months so that the investigators can assess how the patients are doing. The main aim is to evaluate clinical effectiveness of the progressive joint loading protocol. However, the data collected will also be used to see if there is a way of identifying in advance those who might respond better to either treatment. The investigators will also collect some information relating to the cost effectiveness of delivering different treatments. The final aim of this study is to test how easy it is to collect more detailed data in this area if a related study were to be carried out in the future.

Primary Objective To substantiate the efficacy of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® for the treatment of pain related to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs. Secondary Objectives To substantiate the efficacy of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® for the treatment of stiffness and improvement of joint function in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs and with OA of the knee. To substantiate safety and tolerability of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs and with OA of the knee.

In Korea, the interval between knee arthroplasties is usually 1 week. According to previous studies, when total knee arthroplasty was performed at 1-week intervals, total bleeding was reduced and the period of hospital stay was shortened. However, if stepwise total knee arthroplasty is performed at intervals of one week, the pain is greater after the second operation, and the reason for this phenomenon is known to be due to central sensitization and opioid resistance. Therefore, the investigators aim to confirm whether Duloxetine reduces the central sensitization as previously known and affects the pain control after the second operation.

The main objective of this work is to measure the efficiency of 18 days SPA Therapy in orientation rheumatology associated with an educational intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis on a priority objective, personalized and determined by the patient, chosen in the list of 5 objectives determined during the educational assessment.

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparator therapy, parallel group study for symptomatic patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis. The aim is to demonstrate superior efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) in treating knee osteoarthritis. This aim will be objectively measured by endpoint consisting of changes in cartilage thickness from baseline in the MRI. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Questionnaire will be used to calculate The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score. It will measure changes in pain and function from baseline. Approximately 100 subjects will be treated at NorthShore University HealthSystem as part of this study. This study has the potential to improve outcomes in a very common chronic degenerative disease, osteoarthritis, which can have a significant effect on individuals' quality of life.

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with anemia undergoing Simultaneous Bilateral Total knee replacement in terms of Quality of life (QOL) and objective measures (Hemoglobin and Iron parameters).

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with anemia undergoing Simultaneous Bilateral Total knee replacement in terms of Quality of life (QOL) and objective measures (Hb and Iron parameters).

This study will compare the efficacy of intra-articular betamethasone injection to intra-articular ketorolac injection for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis in an equivalence study using a double-blinded, randomized, controlled design. Patients will be recruited from orthopaedic clinics at St. Luke's University Health Network. A total of 448 patients will be recruited (224 in each group) to receive an administration of an intra-articular betamethasone or ketorolac injection. The primary outcome is change in pain as assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Secondary outcomes include Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) and Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living (KOS-ADL) scores and physical exam findings. Statistical analyses include repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (primary outcome) and selected ANOVA and nonparametric tests as deemed appropriate (secondary outcomes), with p < .05 denoting significance for all comparisons, and no adjustment for multiple testing.