Active clinical trials for "Osteoarthritis"

This clinical study is designed as a double-blind sham controlled randomised trial with the option of sham group crossover to receive the GAE treatment at 6 months after unblinding. This study will determine if embolisation of abnormal neovasculature arising from branches of the genicular arteries reduces pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The study patient population will consist of up to 110 subjects with knee pain for at least 3 months that is resistant to conservative treatment measures. Subjects will be treated with knee embolisation or 2 mL of saline in the sham arm. At 6 months, all subjects in the sham arm will be allowed to cross-over and receive the embolisation procedure with a follow-up duration of 18 months. The total planned study duration is 3.5 years.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disease that contributes to chronic pain and disability in approximately 10% of people over the age of 55. With 25% of Canadians expected to be aged 55 or older by 2036, an increasing number of Canadians will be impacted by knee OA. In affected individuals the risk of medical co-morbidities is increased which can lead to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, depression, and poorer quality of life. Current conservative therapy includes oral analgesia, lifestyle modification, corticosteroid injection, and viscosupplementation. These current conservative measures have variable responses. In patients who would prefer to avoid surgery or are not surgical candidates safe and consistently effective treatment options are lacking. Geniculate artery embolization (GAE) is a minimally invasive alternative with low risk of complications that has shown promise in exploratory studies. GAE provides benefit by disrupting angiogenesis in the knee which can contribute to chronic inflammation of the affected joint, and helps prevent the growth of new sensory nerve fibers which can reduce the pain associated with osteoarthritis.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-site, clinical trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of single injection of RTX-GRT7039 versus placebo in patients who have pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee despite standard of care.

The purpose of the study is to find out if the investigational treatment named QUC398 has beneficial effects on osteoarthritis knee pain and knee cartilage, and if it is safe and well tolerated.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of 75 mg of Pregabalin and 150 mg of Pregabalin in postoperative pain control after TKA.

A 3-armed pilot randomized controlled trial: electroacupuncture, sham acupuncture and waitlist groups.

It is a Phase III efficacy study as the title 'A randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study comparing the efficacy of investigational product "Ibuprofen Modified-Release Tablets 800 mg" and placebo in patients with chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee.' The primary objective is to determine the analgesic efficacy of orally administered IBUMR in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The Secondary objectives are to compare the treatment effect on patient pain, function and stiffness between IBUMR- and placebo-treated patients as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), to compare the treatment effect on Patient Global Assessment on Disease Activity between IBUMR- and placebo-treated patients, to compare the treatment effect on Investigator's Global Assessment on Disease Activity between IBUMR- and placebo-treated patients, to compare the use of analgesic rescue medicine between IBUMR- and placebo-treated patients, to determine the safety profile of IBUMR.

Osteoarthritis is defined as a degenerative joint disease characterised by a decrease in joint space due to cartilage loss and the presence of subchondral sclerosis and osteophytes. It is the most common joint disease and is expected to become the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide by 2020. The knee is the joint most affected by osteoarthritis. The prevalence of osteoarthritis of the knee has been increasing in recent years. The main risk factors are female sex, although in recent years there has been a greater relative increase in men, comorbidity, age, mechanical stress and obesity, the latter being of great importance in the progression and development of osteoarthritis. There are two types of osteoarthritis of the knee, primary (idiopathic) and secondary (previous causal alteration). This disease causes pain and disability, so that these patients have difficulty walking, standing, sitting, climbing and descending stairs, resulting in decreased function and negatively impacting the performance of activities of daily living. The Kellgren and Lawrence scale, which marks the degree of involvement of osteoarthritis by the level of joint destruction based on radiography, is a validated method that gives us IV degrees of the disease, with grade I being the mildest and IV the most severe. Pain in this syndrome is a multifactorial phenomenon involving neurophysiological, structural and psychosocial factors (10). In relation to neurophysiological factors, it has been shown that inflammatory mediators in somatic structures alter afferent sensory inputs and induce plastic changes in the nervous system, which can lead to central sensitisation (CS). Sensitisation is defined as an increased response to a painful stimulus by increasing the signal in the central nervous system, either by decreasing the activation of descending inhibitory pain systems or by increasing the pain signal. MRI studies have also shown that patients with osteoarthritis of the knee have a lower degree of disengagement and increased pain vigilance, associated with abnormal activity in different areas of the brain such as the cingulate cortex, insula, amygdala, prefrontal areas and nucleus accubens. Currently, conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee is aimed at reducing pain, increasing function and reducing joint damage by means of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. Pharmacological treatment is based primarily on paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but these drugs are associated with adverse effects, especially at older ages. As for non-pharmacological therapy, we mainly find exercise-based treatment and manual therapy-based treatment, both showing improvements in pain and function of patients and showing better results in combination. Neural mobilisation consists of sliding the nerves, seeking to restore the dynamic balance between the nerve and associated tissues, thus increasing vascularisation, decreasing neural pressure and eliminating harmful fluids. There are studies showing how this technique improves range of motion and knee pain, but more literature on this technique is needed.Our hypothesis is that femoral nerve mobilisation can have a positive effect on function and a decrease in pain in patients with grades I-II osteoarthritis of the knee, with neurodynamics being a possible treatment for these patients. Aims: To determine the effectiveness of treatment with femoral nerve neurodynamics in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Assessing the decrease in pain and increase in function by means of pain intensity, pressure pain thresholds, temporal assessment, pain modulation, KOOS, SF-12 and CSI questionnaires.

The aim of this study is to assess whether the use of a commercially available nutraceutical, turmeric, is an effective option to manage pain and stiffness in patients with basal joint arthritis. To conduct a pilot Randomized Controlled Trial evaluating the impact of turmeric on basal joint arthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder is a disease resulting from the wearing down of cartilage over time. OA can produce pain and dysfunction at the affected joint and is a growing occurrence in an aging population. Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgical treatment used to treat patients with shoulder OA which involves replacing the worn-out ball and socket shoulder joint with prosthetic components. TSA is performed today with high success rates, however, complication rates associated with TSA remain prevalent particularly when the arthritis is associated with bone erosion on the glenoid (socket). Given the high rate of revisions associated with TSA treatment in the setting of glenoid bone erosion, a number of surgical strategies have been developed. These surgical techniques include eccentric reaming which involves removing bone from the front of the socket, augmented glenoid component implantation, and posterior bone grafting to compensate for glenoid bone loss, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Few research studies have compared these different surgical techniques to one another. Previous studies have been limited to case series with small sample sizes and respective designs. This study is being conducted to determine which approach produces better outcomes. For the purpose of this study we will be comparing total shoulder arthroplasty techniques a) augmented glenoid component and eccentric reaming and b) augmented glenoid component and bone grafting in participants with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis.