Active clinical trials for "Osteoarthritis"

In this study, bilateral simultaneous high tibial osteotomy (HTO) was compared with staged bilateral HTO in terms of complications. We did not use any grafts to support the osteotomy line and the patients were mobilized immediately with a full load on a postoperative day 1. And our hypothesis is that bilateral simultaneous applications are safe in comparison to the staged ones in terms of complications.

The study was about a root cause of Primary Osteoarthritis Lumbar Spine producing disabilities in sitting, climbing and walking etc. In advance stage the person is bereft of his/her personal physical activities. The prevalent treatment is temporary and dis-satisfactory. A new treatment was designed and a trial was conducted on 154 patients (100 in the trial group, 50 in the control group) for a duration of six months.

While the coronavirus pandemic has spread rapidly around the world, it has generated a considerable degree of fear, concern and anxiety among the population in general and among certain groups in particular, such as older persons. Initial findings from studies in China indicated the presence of moderate to severe psychological impact in a significant proportion of individuals and an increased prevalence of post-traumatic stress symptoms. It should also be noted that other types of symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, appeared to persist over time and to a greater extent. Osteoarthritis can develop in any joint, but most often affects the knees, hands and hips. People with osteoarthritis are often older and sometimes more frail than the general population. The main recommendations for non-drug treatment of osteoarthritis include education, physical activity and structured exercise programmes with or without weight reduction. Due to the confinement associated with COVID-19, many patients have had to stop exercise/physical activity and postpone prosthetic surgery. Apart from the context of delay in surgery, there is little data available on the impact of the pandemic on people with arthritis. Several questions are therefore still pending concerning the impact of the pandemic on these patients. The investigators hypothesise that the following therapeutic modalities have been disrupted during this period: access to care, scheduling of prosthetic surgery, consumption of painkillers or NSAIDs, recourse to physical activities, recourse to physiotherapy sessions, weight changes, level of pain.... Our objective is to evaluate the physical, social, psychological and behavioural consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in a cohort of osteoarthritis patients.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative disease associated with functional impairments, activity limitations, participation restrictions, as well as poor quality life. Therefore, the comprehensive assessment is important to determine how complex problems affect patients with OA. The first aim of this study was to link and allocate items of The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA index with ICF Comprehensive Core Set for osteoarthritis. The second aim was to examine the relationship between the quality of life and each ICF component's scores determined based on clinical data of WOMAC in OA.

It was conducted a prospective study with a series of 153 patients treated with PRP injections in patient affected by knee osteoarthritis. One independent observer performed clinical and functional evaluations at T0 (recruitment), T1 (one month after the injection), T2 (three months after the last injection) and T3 (six months after the last injection). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Knee Score Society (KSS) score and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were evaluated and recorded for each patient at each follow up.

Degenerative knee arthritis is the most common chronic arthritis disease. Once the elderly suffer from this disease, it will accelerate the loss of body function and autonomy. strength performances and maintain are the most important functional performances of lower extremities, especially in walking and balance in daily activities for elderly people with osteoarthritis(OA) of the knee. However, combining the exercise and visual feedback may promote the muscle strength and functional performances of lower limbs, facilitating the muscle strength, motor and boady functional performances for elderly adults after OA knee. Therefore, the purpose of this proposal is to investigate the changes in muscle strength and physical fitness of lower limbs in older adults following OA knee after visual feedback non-weight bearing exercise intervention.

The objective of this study is to analyse the positioning of the scapula in standing position and compared to the supine position (CT scan) in 3 dimensions (3 rotations of the scapula) using a non-radiant, portable system, combining an ultrasound probe with marker and a camera integrated into a Tablet for the three-dimensional location of the marker (probe).

There are two types of interventions to treat a post-traumatic wrist osteoarthritis: the proximal row carpectomy and the four corner fusion. They are used to reduce pain and to maintain the mobility. In previous studies are shown that the proximal row carpectomy shows a better mobility of the wrist postoperatively, whereas the four corner fusion has lower progression of radiocarpale osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical, radiological and subjective outcomes after the treatment with a proximal row carpectomy or a four corner fusion.

Primary total knee or total hip replacement surgeries are costly high volume procedures & outcomes may be affected by surgical & care processes & individual patient characteristics. The primary hypotheses is that non compliance with recommended practice impacts patient outcomes (e.g. the likelihood of complications following surgery). The primary aims of the study are to evaluate the links between processes & outcomes & if possible develop a model that will improve patient outcomes & reduce unnecessary practice variation whilst considering costs.

The aim of this project is to investigate fMRI ability to identify pain central sensitization in chronic knee OA. Patients with high and low central sensitization and healthy control subjects will be included. Central sensitization will be clinically defined based on the evidence of regional spread of pain (spreading sensitization) and increased pain response to repeated stimulation (temporal summation). Operatively, a patient will be assigned to high sensitization group when showing (i) clinical evidence of pain or altered sensations spread beyond the knee joint by manual palpation, (ii) a minimum of 3 anatomical sites around the knee showing a pressure pain threshold below 4 kg/cm2 (tender points), (iii) pain score of 4 points or more in a 11-point scale during 4 kg/cm2 pressure stimulation on the anterior/medial surface of the tibial bone (the site selected for the fMRI experiment) and (iv) increase of at least 1 point in a 11-point scale after 10 repeated pressure stimulation on the tenderest point around the knee. A three-step strategy is proposed to characterize the phenomenon by assessing (i) brain response to direct pressure stimulation on the painful knee, which will reflect the combination of peripheral and central sensitization; (ii) brain response to pressure stimulation on a non-arthritic hyperalgesic area (i.e., the anterior surface of the tibia), which will mostly reflect central sensitization mediated at the spinal cord level, and (iii) brain response to moderately painful heat stimulation on a healthy skin area (i.e., volar forearm), which will reflect central sensitization occurring in the brain and involving the highest-level pain modulatory mechanisms. An additional evaluation is proposed using resting-state fMRI to assess potential alterations in baseline brain functional organization.